Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
update client code.
Also rename it to use the more generic term `call` instead of something
that could be confused with a praticular type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56183
llvm-svn: 350508
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Summary: Currently, ICP checks the count against a fixed value to see if it is hot enough to be promoted. This does not work for SamplePGO because sampled count may be much smaller. This patch uses PSI to check if the count is hot enough to be promoted.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson, eraman
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36341
llvm-svn: 310416
Summary: In performance tuning, we see performance benefits when enlarge the maximum num promotion targets to 3. This is safe as soon as we have total percentage threshold properly setup (https://reviews.llvm.org/D35962)
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35966
llvm-svn: 309346
Summary: In the current implementation, isPromotionProfitable only checks if the call count to a direct target is no less than a certain percentage threshold of the remaining call counts that have not been promoted. This causes code size problems when the target count is small but greater than a large portion of remaining counts. E.g. target1 takes 99.9%, while target2 takes 0.1%. Both targets will be promoted and inlined, makes the function size too large, which potentially prevents it from further inlining into its callers. This patch adds another percentage threshold against the total indirect call count. If the target count needs to be no less than both thresholds in order to be promoted speculatively.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35962
llvm-svn: 309345
Summary:
Reduce min percent required for indirect call promotion from 33% to 30%,
which matches gcc's threshold and catches the same hot opportunities.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33798
llvm-svn: 304469
Summary:
Refactored the profitability analysis out of the IC promotion pass and
into lib/Analysis so that it can be accessed by the summary index
builder in a follow-on patch to enable IC promotion in ThinLTO (D21932).
Reviewers: davidxl, xur
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22182
llvm-svn: 275216
Craig Topper