Summary:
If the scheduler clusters the loads, then the offsets will be sorted,
but it is possible for the scheduler to scheduler loads together
without out explicitly clustering them, which would give us non-sorted
offsets.
Also, we will want to do this if we move the load/store optimizer before
the scheduler.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23776
llvm-svn: 279870
There was a combine before to handle the simple copy case.
Split this into handling loads and stores separately.
We might want to change how this handles some of the vector
extloads, since this can result in large code size increases.
llvm-svn: 274394
There are a lot of different kinds of loads to test for,
and these were scattered around inconsistently with
some redundancy. Try to comprehensively test all loads
in a consistent way.
llvm-svn: 271571