Fixed by moving ProcessWarningOptions from Frontend into Basic. All of
the dependencies for ProcessWarningOptions were already in Basic, so
this was a small change.
llvm-svn: 207549
It is possible that a variable template specialization might not have a
VisibilityAttr attached to it while the template that it specializes
does, in fact, have one.
We should consider the template in such cases.
This fixes PR19597.
llvm-svn: 207498
See the bug and the cfe-commits thread "[patch] Let stddef.h redefine NULL if
__need_NULL is set" for discussion.
Fixes PR12997 and is similar to the __need_wint_t bits already in this file.
llvm-svn: 207482
and no return expr at the end of the function.
The "function has only simple returns" check in FinishFunction tests
whether the number of simple return exprs equals the number of return
exprs, but so far a fallthrough at the end of a function was not counted
as a return, which would result in cleanup code being associated with the
wrong source line.
rdar://problem/16733984.
llvm-svn: 207480
This patch checks whether the diagnostic options that could lead to
errors (principally -Werror) are consistent between when a module was
built and when it is loaded. If there are new -Werror flags, then the
module is rebuilt. In order to canonicalize the options we do this
check at the level of the constructed DiagnosticsEngine, which contains
the final set of diag to diagnostic level mappings. Currently we only
rebuild with the new diagnostic options, but we intend to refine this in
the future to include the union of the new and old flags, since we know
the old ones did not cause errors. System modules are only rebuilt when
-Wsystem-headers is enabled.
One oddity is that unlike checking language options, we don’t perform
this diagnostic option checking when loading from a precompiled header.
The reason for this is that the compiler cannot rebuild the PCH, so
anything that requires it to be rebuilt effectively leaks into the build
system. And in this case, that would mean the build system
understanding the complex relationship between diagnostic options and
the underlying diagnostic mappings, which is unreasonable. Skipping the
check is safe, because these options do not affect the generated AST.
You simply won’t get new build errors due to changed -Werror options
automatically, which is also true for non-module cases.
llvm-svn: 207477
Summary:
A reference temporary should inherit the linkage of the variable it
initializes. Otherwise, we may hit cases where a reference temporary
wouldn't have the same value in all translation units.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3515
llvm-svn: 207451
It's possible that the "comment AST" may be replaced or split out in the
midterm, any anyway this makes the headers easier to read.
Developers don't currently need to include "clang-c/Documentation.h" explicitly
and there's no macro to test for availability yet.
The raw comment and brief comment accessors have been kept in Index.h though
brief support may also move here as a separate proposal.
This is not a deprecation, just a gentle separation of concerns as we look to
simplify the built-in representation of comment nodes and support external
comment processors.
llvm-svn: 207392
Libraries specify enabled/disabled features using macro defs of 0/1, in such cases the -Wconstant-logical-operand
is noise.
rdar://15410291
llvm-svn: 207386
* It is better if we leave third parties to do "independent" benchmark.
* We compare Clang (version unspecified) with gcc 4.0 or 4.2.
* The graphs have not been updated for a while.
* Clang is well known now. I don't think we still need to explain why
Clang is great.
llvm-svn: 207358
The change was landed without review or test cases.
It trivially broke almost any stable application checking for Severity >=
CXDiagnostic_Error or indeed any other kind of severity comparison upon
encountering a 'remark'.
Mapped to CXDiagnostic_Warning until a workable solution is proposed to the
list that preserves API stability.
(It's also not clear why the rest of r202475 wasn't simply implemented as a
modifier to the existing 'warning' level.)
llvm-svn: 207319