Use the fact that if we visit a for node first in pre and next in post order
we know we did not visit any children, thus we found an innermost loop.
+ Test case for an innermost loop with a conditional inside
llvm-svn: 213870
+ Introduced dependency type TYPE_TC_RED to represent the transitive closure
(& the reverse) of reduction dependences. These are used when we check for
reduction parallel loops.
+ Test cases including loop reversals and modulo schedules which compute
reductions in a alternated order.
llvm-svn: 213019
We move back to a simple approach where the liveout is the last must-write
statement for a data-location plus all may-write statements. The previous
approach did not work out. We would have to consider per-data-access
dependences, instead of per-statement dependences to correct it. As this adds
complexity and it seems we would not gain anything over the simpler approach
that we implement in this commit, I moved us back to the old approach of
computing the liveout, but enhanced it to also add may-write accesses.
We also fix the test case and explain why we can not perform dead code
elimination in this case.
llvm-svn: 212925
As our delinearization works optimistically, we need in some cases run-time
checks that verify our optimistic assumptions. A simple example is the
following code:
void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 150; j++)
for (long k = 0; k < 200; k++)
A[i][j][k] = 1.0;
}
After clang linearized the access to A and we delinearized it again to
A[i][j][k] we need to ensure that we do not access the delinearized array
out of bounds (this information is not available in LLVM-IR). Hence, we
need to verify the following constraints at run-time:
CHECK: Assumed Context:
CHECK: [o, m] -> { : m >= 150 and o >= 200 }
llvm-svn: 212198
This change is particularly useful in the code generation as we need
to know which binary operator/identity element we need to combine/initialize
the privatization locations.
+ Print the reduction type for each memory access
+ Adjusted the test cases to comply with the new output format and
to test for the right reduction type
llvm-svn: 212126
Iterate over all store memory accesses and check for valid binary reduction
candidate loads by following the operands of the stored value. For each
candidate pair we check if they have the same base address and there are no
other accesses which may overlap with them. This ensures that no intermediate
value can escape into other memory locations or is overwritten at some point.
+ 17 test cases for reduction detection and reduction dependency modeling
llvm-svn: 211957
Enabling -keep-going in ScopDetection causes expansion to an invalid
Scop candidate.
Region A <- Valid candidate
|
Region B <- Invalid candidate
If -keep-going is enabled, ScopDetection would expand A to A+B because
the RejectLog is never checked for errors during expansion.
With this patch only A becomes a valid Scop.
llvm-svn: 211875
This change will ease the transision to multiple reductions per statement as
we can now distinguish the effects of multiple reductions in the same
statement.
+ Wrapped reduction dependences are used to compute privatization dependences
+ Modified test cases to account for the change
llvm-svn: 211795
This dependency analysis will keep track of memory accesses if they might be
part of a reduction. If not, the dependences are tracked on a statement level.
The main reason to do this is to reduce the compile time while beeing able to
distinguish the effects of reduction and non-reduction accesses.
+ Adjusted two test cases
llvm-svn: 211794
Add support for generating optimization remarks after completing the
detection of Scops.
The goal is to provide end-users with useful hints about opportunities that
help to increase the size of the detected Scops in their code.
By default the remark is unspecified and the debug location is empty. Future
patches have to expand on the messages generated.
This patch brings a simple test case for ReportFuncCall to demonstrate the
feature.
Reports all missed opportunities to increase the size/number of valid
Scops:
clang <...> -Rpass-missed="polly-detect" <...>
opt <...> -pass-remarks-missed="polly-detect" <...>
Reports beginning and end of all valid Scops:
clang <...> -Rpass="polly-detect" <...>
opt <...> -pass-remarks="polly-detect" <...>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4171
llvm-svn: 211769
Due to bad habit we sometimes used a variable %defaultOpts that listed
a set of passes commonly run to prepare for Polly. None of these test cases
actually needs special preparation and only two of them need the 'basicaa' to
be scheduled. Scheduling the required alias analysis explicitly makes the test
cases clearer.
llvm-svn: 211671
We had a set of test cases that have been incomplete and XFAILED. This patch
completes a couple of the interesting ones and removes the ones which seem
redundant or not sufficiently reduced to be useful.
llvm-svn: 211670
Insert a header into the new testcase containing a sample RUN line a FIXME and
an XFAIL. Then insert the formated C code and finally the LLVM-IR without
attributes, the module ID or the target triple.
llvm-svn: 211612
We use llvm.codegen intrinsic to generate code for embedded LLVM-IR
strings. The reason we introduce such a intrinsic is that previous
clang/opt tools was NOT linked with various LLVM targets and their
AsmParsers and AsmPrinters. Since clang/opt been linked with all the
needed libraries, we no longer need the llvm.codegen intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 211573
+ Collect reduction dependences
+ Introduced TYPE_RED in Dependences.h which can be used to obtain the
reduction dependences
+ Used TYPE_RED to prevent parallelization while we do not have a privatizing
code generation
+ Relax the dependences for non-parallel code generation
+ Add privatization dependences to ensure correctness
+ 12 Test cases to check for reduction and privatization dependences
llvm-svn: 211369
We do this currently only for test cases where we have integer offsets that
clearly access array dimensions out-of-bound.
-; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
-; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
-; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++)
+; for (long i = 0; i < n - 3; i++)
+; for (long j = 4; j < m; j++)
+; for (long k = 0; k < o - 7; k++)
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
This will be helpful if we later want to simplify the access functions under the
assumption that they do not access memory out of bounds.
llvm-svn: 210179
Without this patch, the testcase would fail on the delinearization of the second
array:
; void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++) {
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
; A[i][0][k] = 2.0;
; }
; }
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[3 + i0, -4 + i1, 7 + i2] };
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
Here is the output of FileCheck on the testcase without this patch:
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
^
<stdin>:26:2: note: possible intended match here
[n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[o0] };
^
It is possible to find a good delinearization for A[i][0][k] only in the context
of the delinearization of both array accesses.
There are two ways to delinearize together all array subscripts touching the
same base address: either duplicate the code from scop detection to first gather
all array references and then run the delinearization; or as implemented in this
patch, use the same delinearization info that we computed during scop detection.
llvm-svn: 210117
+ CL-option --polly-tile-sizes=<int,...,int>
The i'th value is used as a tile size for dimension i, if
there is no i'th value, the value of --polly-default-tile-size is
used
+ CL-option --polly-default-tile-size=int
Used if no tile size is given for a dimension i
+ 3 Simple testcases
llvm-svn: 209753
Tag the GPGPU codegen test cases as unsupported if the nvptx target is not
included in the current llvm build.
Contributed-by: Yabin Hu <yabin.hwu@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 208779
Commit r206510 falsely advertised to fix the load cases, even though it only
fixed the store case. This commit adds the same fix for the load case including
the missing test coverage.
llvm-svn: 206577
Even tough we may want to generate a vector load, the address from which to load
still is a scalar. Make sure even if previous address computations may have been
vectorized, that the addresses are also available as scalars.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR19469
Reported-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 206510
The following example shows a non-parallel loop
void f(int a[]) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
A[i] = A[i+5];
}
which, in case we import a schedule that limits the iteration domain
to 0 <= i < 5, becomes parallel. Previously we crashed in such cases, now we
just recognize it as parallel.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR19435
Reported-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <jeremyhu@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 206318
During code preperation trivial PHI nodes (mainly introduced by lcssa) are
deleted to decrease the number of introduced allocas (==> dependences). However
simply replacing them by their only incoming value would cause the independent
block pass to introduce new allocas. To prevent this we try to share stack slots
during code preperarion, hence to reuse a already created alloca 'to demote' the
trivial PHI node. This works if we know that the value stored in this alloca
will be the incoming value of the trivial PHI at the end of the predecessor
block of this trivial PHI.
Contributed-by: Johannes Doerfert <doerfert@cs.uni-saarland.de>
llvm-svn: 205320
We explicitly specifying all filenames instead of assuming some naming
convention used by clang and opt.
Contributed-by: Johannes Doerfert <doerfert@cs.uni-saarland.de>
llvm-svn: 204726
Johannes Doerfert