disabled with the intent that users can start with them now and not have to change
a thing to have them work when we implement the features.
llvm-svn: 93312
incompatible with user-defined literals, specifically with the following form:
0x1p+1
The preprocessing-number token extends only as far as the 'p'; the '+' is not
included. Previously we could get away with this extension as p was an invalid
suffix, but now with user-defined literals, 'p' might well be a valid suffix
and we are forced to consider it as such.
This patch also adds a warning in non-0x C++ modes telling the user that
this extension is incompatible with C++0x that is enabled by default
(previously and with other languages, we warn only with a compliance
option such as -pedantic).
llvm-svn: 93135
1. Don't make a copy of LangOptions every time a lexer is created.
2. Don't make CharInfo global mutable state.
3. Fix the implementation to properly treat ^Z as EOF instead of as
horizontal whitespace, which matches the semantic implemented by VC++.
llvm-svn: 91586
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
declarators are parsed primarily within a single function (at least for
these cases). Remove some excess diagnostics arising during parse failures.
llvm-svn: 85924
which tries to do better error recovery when it is "obvious" that an
identifier is a mis-typed typename. In this case, we try to parse
it as a typename instead of as the identifier in a declarator, which
gives us several options for better error recovery and immediately
makes diagnostics more useful. For example, we now produce:
t.c:4:8: error: unknown type name 'foo_t'
static foo_t a = 4;
^
instead of:
t.c:4:14: error: invalid token after top level declarator
static foo_t a = 4;
^
Also, since we now parse "a" correctly, we make a decl for it,
preventing later uses of 'a' from emitting things like:
t.c:12:20: error: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
int bar() { return a + b; }
^
I'd really appreciate any scrutiny possible on this, it
is a tricky area.
llvm-svn: 68911
Eventually, would be nice to be able to run these modifications even
when we don't want the warning or errors for the actual diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 68272
Note that this isn't really a complete fix; I think there are other
potential overrun situations. I don't really know what the best
systematic fix is, though.
llvm-svn: 55622
Fariborz Jahanian