libc++ ABI v1 provides three valarray symbols as part of the shared library:
valarray<size_t>::valarray(size_t)
valarray<size_t>::~valarray()
valarray<size_t>::resize(size_t, size_t)
The first two of these are intended to be removed in V2 of the ABI: they're
attributed _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1, and it appears that the intention
is that these symbols from the library are not used even when building using
the V1 ABI. However, there are explicit instantiation declarations for all
three symbols in the header, which are not correct as we do not intend to find
an instantiation of these functions that is provided elsewhere.
(A recent change to clang to properly diagnose explicit instantiation
declarations of internal linkage functions -- required by [temp.explicit]p13 --
had to be rolled back because it diagnosed these explicit instantiations.)
Remove the explicit instantiation declarations, and remove the explicit
instantiation definitions for V2 of the libc++ ABI onwards.
llvm-svn: 359243
The current definitions were entirely broken. They didn't call any
existing constructor and the forgot to friend the expression types they
were trying to construct.
llvm-svn: 357453
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF
Subscribers: jyknight, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 351289
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345281
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345214
That macro has been defined to _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1 for many
weeks now, so we're actually replacing uses of it for uses of
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1 directly.
This should not change or break anything since the two macros are
100% equivalent, unless somebody is (incorrectly!) relying on
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY being defined.
llvm-svn: 344641
This patch fixes std::allocator, and more specifically, all users
of __libcpp_allocate and __libcpp_deallocate, to support over-aligned
types.
__libcpp_allocate/deallocate now take an alignment parameter, and when
the specified alignment is greater than that supported by malloc/new,
the aligned version of operator new is called (assuming it's available).
When aligned new isn't available, the old behavior has been kept, and the
alignment parameter is ignored.
This patch depends on recent changes to __builtin_operator_new/delete which
allow them to be used to call any regular new/delete operator. By using
__builtin_operator_new/delete when possible, the new/delete erasure optimization
is maintained.
llvm-svn: 328180
Summary:
Currently libc++ implements some operations on valarray by using the
resize method. This method has a parameter with a default value.
Because of this, valarray may spuriously construct and destruct
objects of valarray's element type.
This patch fixes this issue and adds corresponding test cases.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: rogfer01, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41992
llvm-svn: 324596
Summary:
This patch improves how libc++ handles min/max macros within the headers. Previously libc++ would undef them and emit a warning.
This patch changes libc++ to use `#pragma push_macro` to save the macro before undefining it, and `#pragma pop_macro` to restore the macros and the end of the header.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33080
llvm-svn: 304357
Summary:
On Windows the identifier `__deallocate` is defined as a macro by one of the Windows system headers. Previously libc++ worked around this by `#undef __deallocate` and generating a warning. However this causes the WIN32 version of `__threading_support` to always generate a warning on Windows. This is not OK.
This patch renames all usages of `__deallocate` internally as to not conflict with the macro.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, majnemer, rnk, rsmith, smeenai, compnerd
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28426
llvm-svn: 291332
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
The externally instantiated member functions must be declared using
_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY, not _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, in
order to be properly exported when using __attribute__((internal_linkage)).
Otherwise the explicit instantiations will obviously have internal linkage and
will not be exported from the dylib.
llvm-svn: 281684
This change moves visibility attributes from out-of-class method
definitions to in-class declaration. This is needed for a switch to
attribute((internal_linkage)) (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D13925)
which can only appear on the first declaration.
This change does not touch istream/ostream/streambuf. They are
handled separately in http://reviews.llvm.org/D14409.
llvm-svn: 252385
Visual Studio's SAL extension uses a macro named __deallocate. This macro is
used pervasively, and gets included through various different ways. This
conflicts with the similarly named interfaces in libc++. Introduce a undef
header similar to __undef_min_max to handle this. This fixes a number of errors
due to the macro replacing the function name.
llvm-svn: 229162
This patch just adds the required return statements to slice_array::operator=
and mask_array::operator=.
Tests were added to check that the return value is the same as the object assigned
to.
llvm-svn: 215414
Richard Smith