It doesn't make sense to non-deterministically choose between
`CopyPart(..)` and `InsertPart(..)` when it is known that
`InsertPart(..)` will fail.
This upstream's a change from JFS solver's fork of LibFuzzer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45693
llvm-svn: 330687
This test is failing on my Linux box. Just increasing the number of
iterations works around this. The divergence is likely due to
our reliance on `std::shuffle()` which is not guaranteed to have
the same behaviour across platforms.
This is a strong argument for us to implement our own shuffle
function to avoid divergence in behaviour across platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45767
llvm-svn: 330390
This changes the add_custom_libcxx macro to resemble the
llvm_ExternalProject_Add. The primary motivation is to avoid
unnecessary libFuzzer rebuilds that are being done on every
Ninja/Make invocation. The libc++ should be only rebuilt whenever
the libc++ source itself changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43213
llvm-svn: 326921
add_custom_libcxx uses the just built compiler and installs the
built libc++, e.g. for testing, neither of which is desirable in
case of Fuzzer where the libc++ should be built using the host
compiler and it's only linked into the libFuzzer and should never
be installed. This change introduces additional arguments to
add_custom_libcxx to allow parametrizing its behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42330
llvm-svn: 323054
add_custom_libcxx uses the just built compiler and installs the
built libc++, e.g. for testing, neither of which is desirable in
case of Fuzzer where the libc++ should be built using the host
compiler and it's only linked into the libFuzzer and should never
be installed. This change introduces additional arguments to
add_custom_libcxx to allow parametrizing its behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42330
llvm-svn: 323032
This is needed in case the users of libFuzzer use libc++ in their
code, which the fuzz target (libFuzzer) will be linked against.
When libc++ source is available, we build a private version of it
and link it against libFuzzer which allows using the same static
library against codebases which use both libc++ and libstdc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37631
llvm-svn: 322755
This is needed in case the users of libFuzzer use libc++ in their
code, which the fuzz target (libFuzzer) will be linked against.
When libc++ source is available, we build a private version of it
and link it against libFuzzer which allows using the same static
library against codebases which use both libc++ and libstdc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37631
llvm-svn: 322604
Summary: With 3 Dictionary objects, each containing space of ~16k DictionaryEntry objects, the MutationDispatcher object is fairly memory heavy. On platforms with a lower default stack size, this can cause panics in FuzzerUnittest as those tests stack-allocate the MutationDispatcher. This may be especially problematic for platforms that do not (yet) have a way to programmatically change their stack size, aside from link-time flags. In general, it seems more prudent to use the heap for an object of this size.
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40926
llvm-svn: 319988
Summary:
To be more portable (especially w.r.t. platforms without system()),
commands should be managed programmatically rather than via string
manipulation on the command line. This change introduces
Fuzzer::Command, with methods to manage arguments and flags, set output
options, and execute the command.
Patch By: aarongreen
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: kcc, morehouse
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40103
llvm-svn: 319680
Resulting library binaries will be named libclang_rt.fuzzer*, and will
be placed in Clang toolchain, allowing redistribution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36908
llvm-svn: 311407
Kostya Serebryany