- During instantiation, drop default arguments from constructor and
call expressions; they'll be recomputed anyway, and we don't want
to instantiate them twice.
- Rewrote the instantiation of variable initializers to cope with
non-dependent forms properly.
Together, these fix a handful of problems I introduced with the switch
to always rebuild expressions from the source code "as written."
llvm-svn: 91315
implicitly-generated AST nodes. We previously built instantiated nodes
for each of these AST nodes, then passed them on to Sema, which was
not prepared to see already-type-checked nodes (see PR5755). In some
places, we had ugly workarounds to try to avoid re-type-checking
(e.g., in VarDecl initializer instantiation).
Now, we skip implicitly-generated nodes when performing instantiation,
preferring instead to build just the AST nodes that directly reflect
what was written in the source code. This has several advantages:
- We don't need to instantiate anything that doesn't have a direct
correlation to the source code, so we can have better location
information.
- Semantic analysis sees the same thing at template instantiation
time that it would see for a non-template.
- At least one ugly hack (VarDecl initializers) goes away.
Fixes PR5755.
llvm-svn: 91218
in a potentially potentially evaluated context, queue those
diagnostics and only emit them if the context ends up being
potentially evaluated. This completes the fix for PR5761.
llvm-svn: 91213
__builtin_offsetof, passing through an ellipsis) when we're in an
unevaluated context. This is the first part of the fix to PR5761,
which deals with the simple case of an unevaluated context.
llvm-svn: 91210
specializations and class template partial specializations (they're
never named directly). Also, member access expressions only refer to
value declarations (fields, functions, enumerators, etc.) and
Objective-C property declarations; filter out everything else.
llvm-svn: 91133
is difficult because they're so terribly, terribly ambiguous.
We implement access declarations in terms of using declarations, which is
quite reasonable. However, we should really persist the access/using
distinction in the AST and use the appropriate name in diagnostics. This
isn't a priority, so I'll just file a PR and hope someone else does it. :)
llvm-svn: 91095
declaration. Rename note_using_decl to note_using, which is possibly less confusing.
Add a test for non-class-scope using decl collisions and be sure to note the case
we can't diagnose yet.
llvm-svn: 91057
are a couple of O(n^2) operations in this, some analogous to the usual O(n^2)
redeclaration problem and some not. In particular, retroactively removing
shadow declarations when they're hidden by later decls is pretty unfortunate.
I'm not yet convinced it's worse than the alternative, though.
llvm-svn: 91045
new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the
computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic
information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an
expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit
callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow.
Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the
diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit
better than before. Some examples:
p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Derived'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base'
Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to
a value of
type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers
Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}}
^ ~~
p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class
'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base':
struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base
struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base
Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from
...
^~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long'
cannot bind to
a value of unrelated type 'int'
long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Base' cannot
bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base'
Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field
'i'
int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here
int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}}
^
llvm-svn: 90992
"integer promotion" type associated with an enum decl, and use this type to
determine which type to promote to. This type obeys C++ [conv.prom]p2 and
is therefore generally signed unless the range of the enumerators forces
it to be unsigned.
Kills off a lot of false positives from -Wsign-compare in C++, addressing
rdar://7455616
llvm-svn: 90965
John McCall