Summary:
clangd is using as many threads as logical cores for BackgroundIndex
by default. We observed that it increases latency of foreground tasks.
This patch aims to change that default to number of physical cores to get rid of
that extra latency.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57819
llvm-svn: 353422
Summary:
Memory usage for a sample TU:
Without Dex: 17.9M
With Dex: 24.4M
The memory increase is considerable but seems tolerable.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57878
llvm-svn: 353413
Summary:
This adds include-fixer feature into clangd based on D56903. Clangd now captures
diagnostics caused by typos and attach include insertion fixes to potentially
fix the typo.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits, kadircet, arphaman, mgrang, jkorous, MaskRay, javed.absar, ilya-biryukov, mgorny
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57021
llvm-svn: 353380
Summary:
The check should ignore the main function, the program entry point.
It is not possible to use `std::array<>` for the `argv`.
The alternative is to use `char** argv`.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40604 | PR40604 ]]
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, hans, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57787
llvm-svn: 353327
Summary:
The version bumps are a result of running `npm audit`, which found
3 security issues in previous versions of our dependencies.
Also add 'package-lock.json' to the repo, it's a common practice to
check in those files into the repository to get consistent versions of
dependencies when running on different machines.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: dschuff, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57814
llvm-svn: 353296
Summary:
This enables include insertion by adding canonical includes into
preambledata.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57508
llvm-svn: 353054
Summary:
Implicit functions are outside the control of source authors and should
be exempt from style restrictions.
Tested via running clang tools tests.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57207
llvm-svn: 352968
Summary:
This helps minimize the disruption of not returning declarations as part of
a find-definition response (r352864).
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57580
llvm-svn: 352953
Summary:
This reduces the per-check implementation burden and redundant work.
It also makes checks range-aware by default (treating the commonAncestor
as if it were a point selection should be good baseline behavior).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57570
llvm-svn: 352876
Summary:
The primary problem this solves is to expose the codeAction selection to
AST-based refactorings in a way that makes it easy and efficient for them to
bind to the right parts of the AST.
It should also allow us to make XRefs based features (textDocument/definition)
more robust, more easily implement textDocument/typeDefinition etc.
As an example, template parameter references can be identified without special
handling.
There should be slight speedup too: we can prune most of the AST traversal
in most cases.
Elephant in the room: this is similar-but-different to Tooling/Refactoring/ASTSelection.
That captures a smaller set of AST nodes, has a slightly different way of
representing selections, and generally has mare features and does more work.
The overall shape is pretty similar, and yet I can't quite get to behave as I
expect.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57562
llvm-svn: 352875
Summary:
The primary problem this solves is to expose the codeAction selection to
AST-based refactorings in a way that makes it easy and efficient for them to
bind to the right parts of the AST.
It should also allow us to make XRefs based features (textDocument/definition)
more robust, more easily implement textDocument/typeDefinition etc.
As an example, template parameter references can be identified without special
handling.
There should be slight speedup too: we can prune most of the AST traversal
in most cases.
Elephant in the room: this is similar-but-different to Tooling/Refactoring/ASTSelection.
That captures a smaller set of AST nodes, has a slightly different way of
representing selections, and generally has mare features and does more work.
The overall shape is pretty similar, and yet I can't quite get to behave as I
expect.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57562
llvm-svn: 352874
Summary:
LSP now reflects the declaration/definition distinction.
Language server changes:
- textDocument/definition now returns a definition if one is found, otherwise
the declaration. It no longer returns declaration + definition if they are
distinct.
- textDocument/declaration returns the best declaration we can find.
- For macros, the active macro definition is returned for both methods.
- For include directive, the top of the target file is returned for both.
There doesn't appear to be a discovery mechanism (we can't return everything to
clients that only know about definition), so this changes existing behavior.
In practice, it should greatly reduce the fraction of the time we need to show
the user a menu of options.
C++ API changes:
- findDefinitions is replaced by locateSymbolAt, which returns a
vector<LocatedSymbol> - one for each symbol under the cursor.
- this contains the preferred declaration, the definition (if found), and
the symbol name
This API enables some potentially-neat extensions, like swapping between decl
and def, and exposing the symbol name to the UI in the case of multiple symbols.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57388
llvm-svn: 352864
Summary:
This would make diagnostic fixits more discoverable, especially for
plugins like YCM.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57509
llvm-svn: 352764
Summary:
The check `bugprone-exception-escape` does an AST-based analysis to determine
if a function might throw an exception and warns based on that information.
The analysis part is refactored into a standalone class similiar to
`ExprMutAnalyzer` that is generally useful.
I intent to use that class in a new check to automatically introduce `noexcept`
if possible.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, baloghadamsoftware, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: baloghadamsoftware, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57100
llvm-svn: 352741
This should not happen in normal operation, as it implies that the diagnostics
with some available fixes were produced but the AST is invalid.
Moreover, the code had an error: always returned code actions ignoring the
SupportsCodeAction capability and writing a test for this is impossible,
since this can only happen due to programmer's error rather than invalid inputs.
llvm-svn: 352624
This fixes most references to the paths:
llvm.org/svn/
llvm.org/git/
llvm.org/viewvc/
github.com/llvm-mirror/
github.com/llvm-project/
reviews.llvm.org/diffusion/
to instead point to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.
This is *not* a trivial substitution, because additionally, all the
checkout instructions had to be migrated to instruct users on how to
use the monorepo layout, setting LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS instead of
checking out various projects into various subdirectories.
I've attempted to not change any scripts here, only documentation. The
scripts will have to be addressed separately.
Additionally, I've deleted one document which appeared to be outdated
and unneeded:
lldb/docs/building-with-debug-llvm.txt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57330
llvm-svn: 352514
Summary:
This looks like a useful user-facing configuration parameter,
which should be discoverable.
Also fix a small typo in the description.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57384
llvm-svn: 352509
This should have been part of r352494, which added the corresponding
function. The unit test ended up as a separate commit accidentally.
llvm-svn: 352501
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two stages:
- Stage 1. Decides whether the action is available to the user and
collects all the information required to finish the action.
Should be cheap, since this will run over all the actions known to
clangd on each textDocument/codeAction request from the client.
- Stage 2. Uses information from stage 1 to produce the actual edits
that the code action should perform. This stage can be expensive and
will only run if the user chooses to perform the specified action in
the UI.
One unfortunate consequence of this change is increased latency of
processing the textDocument/codeAction requests, which now wait for an
AST. However, we cannot avoid this with what we have available in the LSP
today.
Reviewers: kadircet, ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56267
llvm-svn: 352494
Summary:
USRs for macros were not cannonical due to usage of cursor location
instead of definition location.
Reviewers: jkorous
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57228
llvm-svn: 352481
Summary:
This enables clangd to intercept compiler diagnostics and attach fixes (e.g. by
querying index). This patch adds missing includes for incomplete types e.g.
member access into class with only forward declaration. This would allow adding
missing includes for user-typed symbol names that are missing declarations
(e.g. typos) in the future.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56903
llvm-svn: 352361
Summary:
Because _Float16 was disabled for X86 targets the unit-tests started failing.
Extract the pieces for _Float16 and run theses tests under AArch64.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, erichkeane, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: javed.absar, xazax.hun, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57249
llvm-svn: 352231
Summary:
Clear the cached file statuses, otherwise we will leave some garbage texts on
the status bar when clangd crashes.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56540
llvm-svn: 352049
Seems the previous statement does not hold up anymore.
Reviewers: steveire
Reviewed By: steveire
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57102
llvm-svn: 352031
With ObjCPropertyDecl, ASTNode.OrigD can be a ObjCPropertyImplDecl
which is not a NamedDecl, leading to a crash since the code
incorrectly assumes ASTNode.OrigD will always be a NamedDecl.
Change by dgoldman (David Goldman)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56916
llvm-svn: 351941
Summary:
The `Acronyms` and `IncludeDefaultAcronyms` options were deprecated in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51832. These options can be removed.
Tested by running the clang-tidy tests.
Reviewers: benhamilton, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56945
llvm-svn: 351921
ClangTidyOptions::getDefaults is not free, it will initialize all
clang-tidy modules to get check-specific options, and we don't use this
information in CodeComplete, so using an empty one (constructed by
default constructor) is sufficient.
llvm-svn: 351826
Summary:
This patch adds some basic supports for clang-tidy configurations in clangd:
- clangd will respect .clang-tidy configurations for each file
- we don't aim to support all clang-tidy options in clangd, only a
small subset of condfigurations (options related to which checks will be
enabled) are supported.
- add a `clang-tidy-checks` CLI option that can override options from
.clang-tidy file
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55256
llvm-svn: 351792
Summary:
Some projects make use of clang plugins when building, but clangd is
not aware of those plugins therefore can't work with the same compile command
arguments.
There were multiple places clangd performed commandline manipulations,
this one also moves them all into OverlayCDB.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, sammccall, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56841
llvm-svn: 351788
The readability-else-after-return check should be smarter about cases where the
variable defined in the condition is used in the `else` branch. This patch makes
it just ignore such cases, but alternative solutions may be better (added a
FIXME).
llvm-svn: 351751
Summary: See rC351531 for the introduction of getStripPluginsAdjuster.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56902
llvm-svn: 351738
all missed!
Thanks to Alex Bradbury for pointing this out, and the fact that I never
added the intended `legacy` anchor to the developer policy. Add that
anchor too. With hope, this will cause the links to all resolve
successfully.
llvm-svn: 351731
Otherwise we don't warn on a struct containing a single public int, but
we warn on a struct containing a single public std::string, which is
inconsistent.
llvm-svn: 351686
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
a stray single '\r' from one file. These are the last line ending issues
I can find in the files containing parts of LLVM's file headers.
llvm-svn: 351634
endings. We already used them in some cases, and this makes things
consistent. This will also simplify updating the licenses in these
files.
llvm-svn: 351632
This installs the new developer policy and moves all of the license
files across all LLVM projects in the monorepo to the new license
structure. The remaining projects will be moved independently.
Note that I've left odd formatting and other idiosyncracies of the
legacy license structure text alone to make the diff easier to read.
Critically, note that we do not in any case *remove* the old license
notice or terms, as that remains necessary until we finish the
relicensing process.
I've updated a few license files that refer to the LLVM license to
instead simply refer generically to whatever license the LLVM project is
under, basically trying to minimize confusion.
This is really the culmination of so many people. Chris led the
community discussions, drafted the policy update and organized the
multi-year string of meeting between lawyers across the community to
figure out the strategy. Numerous lawyers at companies in the community
spent their time figuring out initial answers, and then the Foundation's
lawyer Heather Meeker has done *so* much to help refine and get us ready
here. I could keep going on, but I just want to make sure everyone
realizes what a huge community effort this has been from the begining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56897
llvm-svn: 351631
Summary:
The underlying issue is fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444
and this test ensures the issue does not creep back into our
code-base.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein, hwright
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56918
llvm-svn: 351569
Summary:
It is producing too much input in non-verbose mode,
i.e. a message per indexed file
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56915
llvm-svn: 351563
Summary:
Previously, we weren't recognizing these as smart pointers and thus
weren't allowing non-dereference accesses as we should -- see new test
cases which fail without the fix.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56585
llvm-svn: 351303
- New transport layer for macOS.
- XPC Framework
- Test client
Framework and client were written by Alex Lorenz.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54428
llvm-svn: 351280
Summary:
The documentation for this clang-checker did not explain what the options are. But this checkers only works with at least some options defined.
To discover the options, you have to read the source code. This shouldn't be necessary for users who just have access to the clang-tidy binary.
This revision, explains the options and gives an example.
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56563
llvm-svn: 351261
Summary:
Files without any symbols were never marked as updated during indexing, which resulted in failure while writing shards for these files.
This patch fixes the logic to mark files that are seen for the first time but don't contain any symbols as updated.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56592
llvm-svn: 351170
A lot of our previous FS manipulation was thread-unsafe in practice with
the RealFS implementation.
This switches to a different RealFS mode where path-manipulation is used
to simulate multiple working dirs.
r351050 both added this mode and removed the cache. If we want to
move back to the old implementation we need to put the cache back.
llvm-svn: 351051
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56509 changed the API of the
CXXMethodDecl::getThisType method. Adapt to the change (and re-apply
clang-format) to fix the clang-tidy build.
llvm-svn: 350916
Summary:
Correct the case of the local variables..
Rational:
I want to be able to run clang-tidy on new clang-tidy checker code prior to creating a review (to demonstrate we should dog food our own tools during development, not my suggestion but @Eugene.Zelenko)
To this end I am running the following in a script, prior to make a change.
```
tidy:
@for source in $$(git status -suno | grep ".cpp$$" | cut -c4-) ;\
do \
clang-tidy -quiet $$source -- $(TIDY_FLAGS);\
done
```
I then want to go through the checkers and see which checkers most closely match the review style of the reviewers
```
---
Checks: '
-clang-diagnostic-*,
readability-identifier-naming,
llvm-header-guard
'
WarningsAsErrors: ''
HeaderFilterRegex: ''
AnalyzeTemporaryDtors: false
FormatStyle: LLVM
CheckOptions:
- key: readability-identifier-naming.IgnoreFailedSplit
value: '0'
- key: readability-identifier-naming.VariableCase
value: 'CamelCase'
- key: readability-identifier-naming.LocalVariableCase
value: 'CamelCase'
...
```
Unfortunately in doing so, I have identified that my previous review {D55433} it violates what looks like to be the convention of local variables being in CamelCase.
Sending this small review in the hope it can be corrected.
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56536
llvm-svn: 350814
Summary:
This would save us some memory and disk space:
- Dex usage (261 MB vs 266 MB)
- Disk (75 MB vs 76 MB)
It would save more when we index the main file symbol D55185.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: nridge, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56314
llvm-svn: 350803
Summary: Adds a checker to clang-tidy to warn when a non void const member function, taking only parameters passed by value or const reference could be marked as '[[nodiscard]]'
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: alexfh, stephenkelly, curdeius, aaron.ballman, hokein, JonasToth
Reviewed By: curdeius, JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, lefticus, lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55433
llvm-svn: 350760
Summary:
There is no reason for it to not be a StringRef. Making it one
simplifies existing code, and makes follow-up features easier.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56415
llvm-svn: 350660
Summary:
Unfortunately, yaml::Input::setCurrentDocument() and yaml::Input::nextDocument() are
internal APIs, the way we use them may cause a nullptr accessing when
processing an empty YAML file.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56442
llvm-svn: 350633
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Summary:
With r348365, we now detect libc++ dir using the actual compiler path
(from the compilation command), rather than the resource-dir.
This new behavior will cause clangd couldn't find libc++ dir (even the libc++ is
built from the source) when using a fallback compilation command (`clang xxx`)
The fix is to use `<clangd_install_dir>/clang` as the actual compiler path.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56380
llvm-svn: 350515
Include CheckAtomic CMake module from LLVM in order to detect support
for atomics when building stand-alone. Otherwise,
the HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB variable is undefined and clangd
wrongly attempts to link -latomic on systems not using the library.
Original bug report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/667016
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56061
llvm-svn: 350329
Summary:
This only changes behavior in cases when the file itself is a symlink.
When canonicalizing paths do not look at tryGetRealPathName, which
contains the resolved path for files that are symlinks. Instead first build the
absolute path even if it contains some symlinks on the path. Then resolve only
the symlinks on the path and leave it as it is if the file itself is a symlink.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56263
llvm-svn: 350306
Summary:
Only run completion when we were trigerred on '->' and '::', otherwise
send an error code in return.
To avoid automatically invoking completions in cases like 'a >^' or
'a ? b :^'.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55994
llvm-svn: 350304
Summary:
The file status will be shown in the status bar.
Depends on D55363.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55374
llvm-svn: 350210
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g.
modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro
is provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewed By: JonasToth, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56025
llvm-svn: 350056
Kadir Cetinkaya