It's true the MSVC doesn't warn about dllimport when applied to e.g. a typedef,
but that applies to dllexport too. I'd like us to be consistent, and I think
the right thing to do is to warn.
The original test that came with implementing the old behaviour doesn't provide
a good motivation, and it said it was checking that we're not repoting an *error*,
which is still true since this is just a warning.
There are plenty of tests e.g. in Sema/dllimport.c to check that we do warn
about dllimport on non functions or variables.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3832
llvm-svn: 209546
This is a GNU attribute that causes calls within the attributed function
to be inlined where possible. It is implemented by giving such calls the
alwaysinline attribute.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3816
llvm-svn: 209217
This is a GNU attribute that allows split stacks to be turned off on a
per-function basis.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3817
llvm-svn: 209167
Note that for backwards compatibility, an unnamed capability will default to being a "mutex." This allows the deprecated lockable attribute to continue to function.
llvm-svn: 203012
The __forceinline keyword's semantics are now recast as AlwaysInline and
the kw___forceinline token has its language mode set for KEYMS.
This preserves the semantics of the previous implementation but with
less duplication of code.
llvm-svn: 202131
The following attributes have been (silently) deprecated, with their replacements listed:
lockable => capability
exclusive_locks_required => requires_capability
shared_locks_required => requires_shared_capability
locks_excluded => requires_capability
There are no functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 201585
Thanks to r199467, __attribute__((nonnull)) (without arguments) can apply
directly to parameters, instead of being applied to the whole function.
However, the old form of nonnull (with an argument index) could also apply
to the arguments of function and block pointers, and both of these can be
passed as parameters.
Now, if 'nonnull' with an argument is found on a parameter, /and/ the
parameter is a function or block pointer, it is handled the old way.
PR18795
llvm-svn: 201162
Introduce a notion of a 'current representation method' for
pointers-to-members.
When starting out, this is set to 'best case' (representation method is
chosen by examining the class, selecting the smallest representation
that would work given the class definition or lack thereof).
This pragma allows the translation unit to dictate exactly what
representation to use, similar to how the inheritance model keywords
operate.
N.B. PCH support is forthcoming.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2723
llvm-svn: 201105
If we are in the middle of defining the class, don't attempt to
validate previously annotated declarations. We may not have seen base
specifiers or virtual method declarations yet.
llvm-svn: 200959
We would previously allow inappropriate inheritance keywords to appear
on class declarations. We would also allow inheritance keywords on
templates which were not fully specialized; this was divergent from
MSVC.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2585
llvm-svn: 200423
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
This attribute is supported by GCC. More generally it should
probably be a type attribute, but this behavior matches 'nonnull'.
This patch does not include warning logic for checking if a null
value is returned from a function annotated with this attribute.
That will come in subsequent patches.
llvm-svn: 199626
This allows the following syntax:
void baz(__attribute__((nonnull)) const char *str);
instead of:
void baz(const char *str) __attribute__((nonnull(1)));
This also extends to Objective-C methods.
The checking logic in Sema is not as clean as I would like. Effectively
now we need to check both the FunctionDecl/ObjCMethodDecl and the parameters,
so the point of truth is spread in two places, but the logic isn't that
cumbersome.
Implements <rdar://problem/14691443>.
llvm-svn: 199467
Additionally, remove the optional nature of the spelling list index when creating attributes. This is supported by table generating a Spelling enumeration when the spellings for an attribute are distinct enough to warrant it.
llvm-svn: 199378
consumable objects. These are useful for implementing error codes that
must be checked. Patch also includes some significant refactoring, which was
necesary to implement the new behavior.
llvm-svn: 199169
Since this warning was generalized, it was also given a sensible warning group flag and the corresponding test was updated to reflect this.
llvm-svn: 198053
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
That's a mouthful, and not necessarily the final name. This also
reflects a semantic change where this attribute is now on the
protocol itself instead of a class. This attribute will require
that a protocol, when adopted by a class, is explicitly implemented
by the class itself (instead of walking the super class chain).
Note that this attribute is not "done". This should be considered
a WIP.
llvm-svn: 196955
which specifies couple of (optional) method selectors
for bridging a CFobject to or from an ObjectiveC
object. This is wip. // rdsr://15499111
llvm-svn: 196408
designated initializers of an interface.
If the interface declaration does not have methods marked as designated
initializers then the interface inherits the designated initializers of
its super class.
llvm-svn: 196315
I have disabled some attribute subject lines on purpose in Attr.td;
this part is a WIP with the goal being to restore those subjects
incrementally. By commenting them out, it leaves the original behavior
the same as before for those attributes and so those are not
functionality changes.
llvm-svn: 195841
look at the attribute spelling instead. The 'ownership_*' attributes should
probably be split into separate *Attr classes, but that's more than I wanted to
do here.
llvm-svn: 195805
This is still an experimental attribute, but I wanted it in tree
for review. It may still get yanked.
This attribute can only be applied to a class @interface, not
a class extension or category. It does not change the type
system rules for Objective-C, but rather the implementation checking
for Objective-C classes that explicitly conform to a protocol.
During protocol conformance checking, clang recursively searches
up the class hierarchy for the set of methods that compose
a protocol. This attribute will cause the compiler to not consider
the methods contributed by a super class, its categories, and those
from its ancestor classes. Thus this attribute is used to force
subclasses to redeclare (and hopefully re-implement) methods if
they decide to explicitly conform to a protocol where some of those
methods may be provided by a super class.
This attribute intentionally leaves out properties, which are associated
with state. This attribute only considers methods (at least right now)
that are non-property accessors. These represent methods that "do something"
as dictated by the protocol. This may be further refined, and this
should be considered a WIP until documentation gets written or this
gets removed.
llvm-svn: 195533
whose semantic is currently identical to objc_bridge,
but their differences may manifest down the road with
further enhancements. // rdar://15498044
llvm-svn: 195376
After implementing this patch, a few concerns about the language
feature itself emerged in my head that I had previously not considered.
I want to resolve those design concerns first before having
a half-designed language feature in the tree.
llvm-svn: 195328
The idea is to allow a class to stipulate that its methods (and those
of its parents) cannot be used for protocol conformance in a subclass.
A subclass is then explicitly required to re-implement those methods
of they are present in the class marked with this attribute.
Currently the attribute can only be applied to an @interface, and
not a category or class extension. This is by design. Unlike
protocol conformance, where a category can add explicit conformance
of a protocol to class, this anti-conformance really needs to be
observed uniformly by all clients of the class. That's because
the absence of the attribute implies more permissive checking of
protocol conformance.
This unfortunately required changing method lookup in ObjCInterfaceDecl
to take an optional protocol parameter. This should not slow down
method lookup in most cases, and is just used for protocol conformance.
llvm-svn: 195323
into a separate "parse an attribute that takes a type argument" codepath. This
results in both codepaths being a lot cleaner and simpler, and fixes some bugs
where the type argument handling bled into the expression argument handling and
caused us to both accept invalid and reject valid attribute arguments.
llvm-svn: 193731
This reverts commit r193161.
It broke
void foo() __attribute__((alias("bar")));
void bar() {}
void zed() __attribute__((alias("foo")));
Looks like we have to fix pr17639 first :-(
llvm-svn: 193162
names. For example, with this patch we now reject
void f1(void) __attribute__((alias("g1")));
This patch is implemented in CodeGen. It is quiet a bit simpler and more
compatible with gcc than implementing it in Sema. The downside is that the
errors only fire during -emit-llvm.
llvm-svn: 193161
ResolveSingleFunctionTemplateSpecialization() returns 0 and doesn't emit diags
unless the expression has template-ids, so we must null check the result.
Also add a better diag noting which overloads are causing the problem.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman.
llvm-svn: 193055
to be treated as return values, and marked with the "returned_typestate"
attribute. Patch by chris.wailes@gmail.com; reviewed by delesley@google.com.
llvm-svn: 192932
that a function can be called in. This reduced the total number of annotations
needed and makes writing more complicated behaviour less burdensome.
Patch by chriswails@gmail.com.
llvm-svn: 191983
This attribute allows users to use a modified C or C++ function as an ARM
exception-handling function and, with care, to successfully return control to
user-space after the issue has been dealt with.
rdar://problem/14207019
llvm-svn: 191769
of ObjectiveC properties to mean annotation of
NS_RETURNS_INNER_POINTER on its synthesized getter.
This also facilitates more migration to properties when
methods are annotated with NS_RETURNS_INNER_POINTER.
// rdar://14990439
llvm-svn: 191009
Fix for PR16752. Second commit.
PR16752: 'mode' attribute for unusual targets doesn't work properly
Description:
Troubles could be happened due to some assumptions in handleModeAttr function (see SemaDeclAttr.cpp).
For example, it assumes that 32 bit integer is 'int', while it could be 16 bit only.
Instead of asking target: 'which type do you want to use for int32_t ?' it just hardcodes general opinion. That doesn't looks pretty correct.
Please consider the next solution:
1. In Basic/TargetInfo add getIntTypeByWidth and getRealTypeByWidth methods. Methods asks target for proper type for given bit width.
2. Fix handleModeAttr according to new methods in TargetInfo.
Fixes:
1st Commit (Done): Add new methods for TargetInfo:
getRealTypeByWidth and getIntTypeByWidth
for ASTContext names are almost same(invokes new methods from TargetInfo):
getIntTypeForBitwidth and getRealTypeForBitwidth
2nd Commit (Current): Fix SemaDeclAttr, handleModeAttr function.
Also test/Sema/attr-mode.c was fixed. 'XC' mode test was disabled for PPC64 machines.
llvm-svn: 190926
This fixes a couple of latent crashes for invalid attributes and also adds a
fixit hint to turn identifiers into string literals if one was expected. It then
proceeds recovery as if the identifier was a literal. Diagnostic locations are
also changed to point at the literal instead of the attribute if the error
concerns the argument. PR17175.
For example:
hidden.c:1:40: error: 'visibility' attribute requires a string
extern int x __attribute__((visibility(hidden)));
^
" "
hidden.c:2:29: error: visibility does not match previous declaration
extern int x __attribute__((visibility("default")));
^
hidden.c:1:29: note: previous attribute is here
extern int x __attribute__((visibility(hidden)));
^
llvm-svn: 190699
PR16752: 'mode' attribute for unusual targets doesn't work properly
Description:
Troubles could be happened due to some assumptions in handleModeAttr function (see SemaDeclAttr.cpp).
For example, it assumes that 32 bit integer is 'int', while it could be 16 bit only.
Instead of asking target: 'which type do you want to use for int32_t ?' it just hardcodes general opinion. That doesn't looks pretty correct.
Please consider the next solution:
1. In Basic/TargetInfo add getIntTypeByWidth and getRealTypeByWidth methods. Methods asks target for proper type for given bit width.
2. Fix handleModeAttr according to new methods in TargetInfo.
Fixes:
1st Commit (Done): Add new methods for TargetInfo:
getRealTypeByWidth and getIntTypeByWidth
for ASTContext names are almost same(invokes new methods from TargetInfo):
getIntTypeForBitwidth and getRealTypeForBitwidth
2nd Commit (Current): Fix SemaDeclAttr, handleModeAttr function.
llvm-svn: 190391
This information is used for return states and pass-by-value parameter
states.
Patch by Chris Wailes.
Review by DeLesley Hutchins and Aaron Ballman.
llvm-svn: 190116
Patch by chris.wailes@gmail.com
Functions can now declare what state the consumable type the are returning will
be in. This is then used on the caller side and checked on the callee side.
Constructors now use this attribute instead of the 'consumes' attribute.
llvm-svn: 189843
Patch by chris.wailes@gmail.com
Adds the 'consumable' attribute that can be attached to classes. This replaces
the previous method of scanning a class's methods to see if any of them have
consumed analysis attributes attached to them. If consumed analysis attributes
are attached to methods of a class that isn't marked 'consumable' a warning
is generated.
llvm-svn: 189702
Reviewed by delesley, dblaikie.
Add the annotations and code needed to support a basic 'consumed' analysis.
Summary:
This new analysis is based on academic literature on linear types. It tracks
the state of a value, either as unconsumed, consumed, or unknown. Methods are
then annotated as CallableWhenUnconsumed, and when an annotated method is
called while the value is in the 'consumed' state a warning is issued. A value
may be tested in the conditional statement of an if-statement; when this occurs
we know the state of the value in the different branches, and this information
is added to our analysis. The code is still highly experimental, and the names
of annotations or the algorithm may be subject to change.
llvm-svn: 188206
Make sure we can properly generate code when the UUID has curly braces
on it, strip the curly braces at the sema layer.
This fixes PR16813.
llvm-svn: 188061
The functionality is equivalent to the GCC attribute. Variables of tagged
types will be warned about as unused if they are not used in any way
except for possible (even non-trivial) ctors/dtors called. Useful for tagging
classes like std::string (which is not part of this commit).
llvm-svn: 186765
Aaron Ballman