Using -isystem marks the headers as system headers, which means that we
don't actually get all the warnings that we'd normally get if we included
the headers as user headers.
The goal of the test suite is normally to mirror as closely as possible
how users would use the library. Technically, this change goes against
that philosophy, since users should be using `-isystem` (if they ever
need to specify the libc++ path explicitly, which should be a rare
occurence). However, I believe fishing out additional warnings from
the headers provides more value, hence this change. Ideally, we'd be
able to still use `-isystem`, but instruct Clang to still emit warnings
from the libc++ headers (e.g. we could tell Clang to emit warnings in
any file inside `<...>/usr/include/c++/v1`).
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, #libc_abi
Spies: Mordante, EricWF, mstorsjo, mgorny, aheejin, arichardson, philnik, jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118616
The NFC part of D116809. We still want to enforce this in CI,
but the mechanism for that is still to-be-determined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116809
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
This will avoid typos like `_LIBCPP_STD_VERS` (<future>) or using `#if TEST_STD_VER > 17` without including "test_macros.h".
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99515
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides rvalue references
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support rvalue references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84943
Too many warnings are being disabled too quickly. Warnings are
important to keeping libc++ correct. This patch re-enables two
warnings: -Wconstant-evaluated and -Wdeprecated-copy.
In future, all warnings disabled for the test suite should require
an attached bug. The bug should state the plan for re-enabling that
warning, or a strong case why it should remain disabled.
Previously these types rehashed to a table of 193 elements
upon construction. But this is non-ideal, first because default
constructors should not allocate unless necessary, and second
because 193 is big and can waste a bunch of memory.
This number had previously been chosen to match GCC's implementation.
llvm-svn: 367605
The `using namespace std;` opens us up to ambiguity
when any of the std:: names are also present in the global namespace.
Instead we should properly qualify names we use from std::.
llvm-svn: 361074
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
This time I kept <ext/hash_map> working!
This patch is the first in a series of patches that's meant to better
support unordered_map. unordered_map has a special "value_type" that
differs from pair<const Key, Value>. In order to meet the EmplaceConstructible
and CopyInsertable requirements we need to teach __hash_table about this
special value_type.
This patch creates a "__hash_node_types" traits class that contains
all of the typedefs needed by the unordered containers and it's iterators.
These typedefs include ones for each node type and node pointer type,
as well as special typedefs for "unordered_map"'s value type.
As a result of this change all of the unordered containers now all support
incomplete types.
As a drive-by fix I changed the difference_type in __hash_table to always
be ptrdiff_t. There is a corresponding change to size_type but it cannot
take affect until an ABI break.
This patch will be followed up shortly with fixes for various unordered_map
bugs and problems.
llvm-svn: 260431
Summary:
Throughout the libc++ headers, there are a few instances where
_VSTD::move() is used to return a local variable. Howard commented in
r189039 that these were there "for non-obvious reasons such as to help
things limp along in C++03 language mode".
However, when compiling these headers with warnings on, and in C++11 or
higher mode (like we do in FreeBSD), they cause the following complaints
about pessimizing moves:
In file included from tests.cpp:26:
In file included from tests.hpp:29:
/usr/include/c++/v1/map:1368:12: error: moving a local object in a return statement prevents copy elision [-Werror,-Wpessimizing-move]
return _VSTD::move(__h); // explicitly moved for C++03
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/__config:368:15: note: expanded from macro '_VSTD'
#define _VSTD std::_LIBCPP_NAMESPACE
^
Attempt to fix this by adding a _LIBCPP_EXPLICIT_MOVE() macro to
__config, which gets defined to _VSTD::move for pre-C++11, and to
nothing for C++11 and later.
I am not completely satisfied with the macro name (I also considered
_LIBCPP_COMPAT_MOVE and some other variants), so suggestions are
welcome. :)
Reviewers: mclow.lists, howard.hinnant, EricWF
Subscribers: arthur.j.odwyer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11394
llvm-svn: 245421
Summary: Currently we only enable the use of __is_final(...) with Clang. GCC also provides __is_final(...) since 4.7 in all standard modes. This patch creates the macro _LIBCPP_HAS_IS_FINAL to note the availability of `__is_final`.
Reviewers: danalbert, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8795
llvm-svn: 239664
Instead, define explicit specializations for the basic types listed in
the SGI documentation. This solves two problems:
1) Helps avoid silent ODR violations caused by the absence of a
user-supplied __gnu_cxx::hash specialization in cases where a std::hash
specialization exists (e.g. for std::string).
2) __gnu_cxx::hash semantics are slightly different to those of
std::hash (for example, the former may dereference a pointer argument)
so it is inappropriate for __gnu_cxx::hash to receive std::hash
specializations by default.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2747
llvm-svn: 203070
This was checked in without review. It is not clear its reasonable to
include with libc++ at all, and needs discussion at a highlevel before
moving forward.
It's also completely lacking tests, and included several bugs in the
implementation.
llvm-svn: 136577
together to get it working with code, and is neither optimal
(erase(Iterator, Iterator) calculates the previous iterator twice,
rather than calculating the previous iterator of the first one, then
advancing it until the second is found) nor complete (splice() was not
implemented). Most of the implementation is borrowed from forward_list
via using-declarations.
llvm-svn: 136542
are two motivations for this.
First, this allows users who are specializing __gnu_ext::hash to
continue doing so without changing their code.
Second, SGI specifies hash overloads for char* and const char* that
perform a hash of the string, not of the pointer.
In order to support this, the hashing code for string is factored out.
llvm-svn: 136539
the type name 'data_type', which is specified by the SGI spec as being
the correct type name for the mapped type. The second is an overload of
insert found in standard containers, taking an iterator as a 'hint'
(which we ignore in the standard containers as well). libstdc++'s
implementation includes these overloads, and they are needed to make
insert_iterator work (which I suspect is the real motivation for
including them in the standard containers).
The motivation for including these overloads of insert and leaving the
mapped_type typedef is to make it easier for clients to migrate to the
standard containers.
llvm-svn: 136538
Nikolas Klauser