Summary:
This patch (on top of the previous two (https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898 and
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40899) complete the compiler-rt side of the the Solaris
sanitizer port.
It contains the following sets of changes:
* For the time being, the port is for 32-bit x86 only, so reject the various tests on
x86_64.
* When compiling as C++, <setjmp.h> resp. <iso/setjmp_iso.h> only declares
_setjmp and _longjmp inside namespace std.
* MAP_FILE is a Windows feature. While e.g. Linux <sys/mman.h> provides a
no-op compat define, Solaris does not.
* test/asan/TestCases/Posix/coverage.cc was initially failing like this:
/vol/gcc/src/llvm/llvm/local/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/scripts/sancov.py: 4 files merged; 2 PCs total
rm: cannot remove '/var/gcc/llvm/local/projects/compiler-rt/test/asan/I386SunOSConfig/TestCases/Posix/Output/coverage': Invalid argument
Further digging revealed that the rm was trying to remove the running test's working
directory which failed as observed. cd'ing out of the dir before let the test pass.
* Two tests needed a declaration of alloca. I've now copied the existing code from
test/asan/TestCases/alloca_constant_size.cc, but it may be more profitable and
maintainable to have a common testsuite header where such code is collected.
* Similarly, Solaris' printf %p format doesn't include the leading 0x.
* In test/asan/TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c, I had to undef __EXTENSIONS__
(predefined by clang for no apparent reason) to avoid conflicting declarations
for memalign.
* test/ubsan/TestCases/Float/cast-overflow.cpp has different platform dependent
ways to define BYTE_ORDER and friends. Why not just use __BYTE_ORDER__ and
friends as predefined by clang and gcc?
Patch by Rainer Orth.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, mgorny, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40900
llvm-svn: 322635
This is needed in case the users of libFuzzer use libc++ in their
code, which the fuzz target (libFuzzer) will be linked against.
When libc++ source is available, we build a private version of it
and link it against libFuzzer which allows using the same static
library against codebases which use both libc++ and libstdc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37631
llvm-svn: 322604
Summary: -fPIE can not be used when building a shared library.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, peter.smith
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42121
llvm-svn: 322588
Currently these files are being installed into a root installation
directory, but this triggers an error when the installation directory
is set to an empty string which is often the case when DESTDIR is
used to control the installation destination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41673
llvm-svn: 322451
Summary:
Some time ago, the sanitizers as of r315899 were imported into gcc mainline. This broke
bootstrap on Darwin 10 and 11, as reported in GCC PR sanitizer/82824
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824) due to the unconditional use
of VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE. This was only introduced in Darwin 13/Mac OS X 10.9.
The use of the macro was introduced in r300450.
I couldn't find any statement which Darwin versions are supposed to be supported by
LLVM, but the trivial patch to use the macro only if present allowed the gcc bootstrap
to finish.
So far, I haven't tried building llvm/compiler-rt on Darwin 11. Maybe the patch is
simple enough to go in nonetheless.
Committing on behalf of ro.
Reviewers: glider, fjricci, kcc, kuba, kubamracek, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: fjricci
Subscribers: #sanitizers, zaks.anna, srhines, dberris, kubamracek, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39888
llvm-svn: 322437
Summary: It is not necessary launching the build script with bash.
Reviewers: krytarowski
Reviewed By: krytarowski
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42008
llvm-svn: 322422
Summary:
itimerval can contain padding that may be legitimately uninitialized.
On NetBSD there are four integers of type "long, int, long, int", the
int argument stands for __sanitizer_suseconds_t. Compiler adds extra
padding in this layout.
Check every field of struct itimerval separately.
Define __sanitizer_suseconds_t as long on FreeBSD, Linux and SmartOS,
and int on NetBSD. Define __sanitizer_timeval and __sanitizer_itimerval.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: eugenis, joerg, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: emaste, kubamracek, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41502
llvm-svn: 322399
Summary:
This is needed for the shared runtime since we are pulling RTUbsan in.
Otherwise some builds might fail with errors such as:
`error: undefined reference to '__dynamic_cast'`
Reviewers: alekseyshl, srhines
Reviewed By: srhines
Subscribers: kongyi, pirama, chh, mgorny, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41995
llvm-svn: 322389
Summary:
Very basic stack instrumentation using tagged pointers.
Tag for N'th alloca in a function is built as XOR of:
* base tag for the function, which is just some bits of SP (poor
man's random)
* small constant which is a function of N.
Allocas are aligned to 16 bytes. On every ReturnInst allocas are
re-tagged to catch use-after-return.
This implementation has a bunch of issues that will be taken care of
later:
1. lifetime intrinsics referring to tagged pointers are not
recognized in SDAG. This effectively disables stack coloring.
2. Generated code is quite inefficient. There is one extra
instruction at each memory access that adds the base tag to the
untagged alloca address. It would be better to keep tagged SP in a
callee-saved register and address allocas as an offset of that XOR
retag, but that needs better coordination between hwasan
instrumentation pass and prologue/epilogue insertion.
3. Lifetime instrinsics are ignored and use-after-scope is not
implemented. This would be harder to do than in ASan, because we
need to use a differently tagged pointer depending on which
lifetime.start / lifetime.end the current instruction is dominated
/ post-dominated.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41602
llvm-svn: 322324
Currently these files are being installed into a root installation
directory, but this triggers an error when the installation directory
is set to an empty string which is often the case when DESTDIR is
used to control the installation destination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41673
llvm-svn: 322256
Currently these files are being installed into a root installation
directory, but this triggers an error when the installation directory
is set to an empty string which is often the case when DESTDIR is
used to control the installation destination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41673
llvm-svn: 322234
Summary:
Enable the compile-time flag -fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor by
default. Note that the run-time option MSAN_OPTIONS=poison_in_dtor=1
still needs to be enabled for destructors to be poisoned.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka, kcc
Reviewed By: eugenis, vitalybuka
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37860
llvm-svn: 322221
Summary:
Avoid flaky test failures by by using a monotonic number sequence of
heap tags.
Does not affect stack tags: the way we generate those guarantees
uniqueness for at least 30-something first allocas in any function,
as well as the UAR tag.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41882
llvm-svn: 322214
Currently these files are being installed into a root installation
directory, but this triggers an error when the installation directory
is set to an empty string which is often the case when DESTDIR is
used to control the installation destination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41673
llvm-svn: 322153
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
This change removes exception specifications from the function types recorded
for -fsanitize=function, both in the functions themselves and at the call sites.
That means that calling a non-noexcept function through a noexcept pointer will
also not be flagged as UB. In the review of this change, that was deemed
acceptable, at least for now. (See the "TODO" in compiler-rt
test/ubsan/TestCases/TypeCheck/Function/function.cpp.)
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 321860
NDK < 13 & API_LEVEL < 21 do not define struct mmsghdr.
Newer NDK use unified headers and provide this definition for all api
levels.
Since we can not check for the NDK version, check the api level. This
is more strict than absolutely necessary, but it does not really
matter: it is only a sanity check.
llvm-svn: 321817
Summary:
It used to fail on the bots, but I could not repro it locally. So turn it back
on to try and see if it still fails and maybe get to the heart of it.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, flowerhack
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: aemerson, srhines, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41707
llvm-svn: 321812
Summary:
`__scudo_set_rss_limit`'s `LimitMb` should really be a `size_t`. Update
accordingly the prototype. To avoid the `NOLINT` and conform with the other
Sanitizers, use the sanitizers types for the internal definition. This should
have no functional change.
Additionally, capitalize a variable name to follow the LLVM coding standards.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, flowerhack
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41704
llvm-svn: 321803
We're having some use cases where we have more than 128 (the current maximum) instrumented dynamic libraries loaded into a single process. Let's bump the limit to 1024, and separate the constants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41190
llvm-svn: 321782
Summary: Extend the sendmsg test to cover all recv*.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41620
llvm-svn: 321774
Summary:
This way new asan_device_setup, which knows about the quirks of
recent releases of Android, can be used with older ASan runtime
library (say, from an NDK release). The library is version locked to
the compiler, and is often hard or impossible to update.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41679
llvm-svn: 321677
This macro is only defined after XCode 8, causing build breakage for
build systems with prior versions. Ignore DISPATCH_NOESCAPE if not
defined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41601
llvm-svn: 321543
...when such an operation is done on an object during con-/destruction.
(This adds a test case to compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/TypeCheck/vptr.cpp
that, unlike the existing test cases there, wants to detect multiple UBSan
warnings in one go. Therefore, that file had to be changed from globally using
-fno-sanitize-recover to individually using halt_on_error only where
appropriate.)
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40295
llvm-svn: 321518
FDRLoggingTest::MultiThreadedCycling uses std::array so we need to
include the right C++ header and not rely on transitive dependencies.
llvm-svn: 321485
As reported in PR35739, rL252927 added the Windows specific chkstk and
chkstk2 sources unconditionally, and since these are assembly without a
NO_EXEC_STACK_DIRECTIVE at the end, automated vulnerability scanners
warned about the objects having an executable stack.
Avoid the problem by only including these files when Windows is
targeted.
Reviewers: compnerd, rnk, martell
Reviewed By: martell
Subscribers: mstorsjo, mgorny, martell, javed.absar, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41567
llvm-svn: 321431
Summary:
Export aligned new/delete to make dynamic runtimes work again.
Remove all valid new/delete cases from ASan test, there's a test in
common for that.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41548
llvm-svn: 321394
r318733 introduced a build failure for native MIPS32 systems for xray due
to the lack of __sync_fetch_and_add / __syn_fetch_and_sub support. This patch
extends the existing support providing atomics so that xray can be
successfully built.
The initial patch was reverted in r321292, as I suspected it may have caused the
buildbot failure. Another patch in the updates the bot fetched caused the test
failures which was reverted.
Reviewers: atanasyan, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40385
llvm-svn: 321383
Summary:
This patch, on top of https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898, contains the build system
changes necessary to enable the Solaris/x86 sanitizer port.
The only issue of note is the libclang_rt.sancov_{begin, end} libraries: clang relies on the
linker automatically defining __start_SECNAME and __stop_SECNAME labels for
sections whose names are valid C identifiers. This is a GNU ld extension not present
in the ELF gABI, also implemented by gold and lld, but not by Solaris ld. To work around
this, I automatically link the sancov_{begin,end} libraries into every executable for now.
There seems to be now way to build individual startup objects like crtbegin.o/crtend.o,
so I've followed the lead of libclang_rt.asan-preinit which also contains just a single
object.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, mgorny, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40899
llvm-svn: 321373
Summary:
Providing aligned new/delete implementations to match ASan.
Unlike ASan, MSan and TSan do not perform any additional checks
on overaligned memory, hence no sanitizer specific tests.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41532
llvm-svn: 321365
Petr Hosek