Fix to get the AST we generate for function templates closer to what clang generates and expects.
We fix which FuntionDecl we are passing to CreateFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo and we strip
template parameters from the name when creating the FunctionDecl and FunctionTemplateDecl.
These two fixes together fix asserts and ambiguous lookup issues for several cases which are added to the already existing small function template test.
This fixes issues with overloads, overloads and ADL, variadic function templates and templated operator overloads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75761
The error_stream and result parameter were inconsistently checked for
being null, so we might as well make them references instead of crashing
in case someone passes a nullptr and hits one of the code paths that are
currently not doing a nullptr check on those parameters. Also change
output_stream for consistency.
I believe the actual opcode does not matter because the AVR architecture
is a Harvard architecture that does not support writing to program
memory. Therefore, debuggers and emulators provide hardware breakpoints.
But for some reason, this opcode must be defined or else LLDB will crash
with an assertion error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74255
This was previously crashing due to a missing nullptr check (see
e2d8aa6bf7 ). This just adds a test that should
make sure this doesn't crash in case a user ends up in this strange setup.
The GDB replay server sanity-checks that every packet it receives
matches what it expects from the serialized packet log. This mechanism
tripped for TestReproducerAttach.py on Linux, because one of the packets
(jModulesInfo) uses run-length encoding. The replay server was comparing
the expanded incoming packet with the unexpanded packet in the log. As a
result, it claimed to have received an unexpected packet, which caused
the test to fail.
This patch addresses that issue by expanding the run-length encoding
before comparing the packets.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76163
The nullptr check here was removed in 4ef50a33b1
when I replaced (nearly) all log->Print to LLDB_LOG calls (which automatically
check for this stuff). But it seems this one call escaped my sed call.
Currently working on a test that can cover this code path but we can revert
this until I have found one.
Commit [1] added a declaration of function-member
StackFrame::BehavesLikeZerothFrame but hasn't added an implementation
for the function. This commit removes this declation, because the
function is not used anywhere.
[1] 31e6dbe1c6 Fix PC adjustment in StackFrame::GetSymbolContext
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75979
Patch by Anton Kolesov <Anton.Kolesov@synopsys.com>
Fix to code from https://reviews.llvm.org/D64993.
Field StackFrame::m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame was introduced in commit
[1], however that commit hasn't added a copying of the field to
UpdatePreviousFrameFromCurrentFrame, therefore the value wouldn't change
when updating frames to reflect the current situation.
The particular scenario, where this matters is following. Assume we have
function main that invokes function func1. We set breakpoint at
func1 entry and in main after the func1 call, and do not stop at
the main entry. Therefore, when debugger stops for the first time,
func1 is frame#0, while main is frame#1, thus
m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame is set to 0 for main frame. Execution is
resumed, and stops now in main, where it is now frame#0. However while
updating the frame object, m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame remains false.
This field plays an important role when calculating line information for
backtrace: for frame#0, PC is the current line, therefore line
information is retrieved for PC, however for all other frames this is
not the case - calculated PC is a return-PC, i.e. instruction after the
function call line, therefore for those frames LLDB needs to step back
by one instruction. Initial implementation did this strictly for frames
that have index != 0 (and index is updated properly in
UpdatePreviousFrameFromCurrentFrame), but m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame
added a capability for middle-of-stack frames to behave in a similar
manner. But because current code now doesn't check frame idx,
m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame must be set to true for frames with 0 index,
not only for frame that behave like one. In the described test case,
after stopping in main, LLDB would still consider frame#0 as
non-zeroth, and would subtract instruction from the PC, and would report
previous like as current line.
The error doesn't manifest itself in LLDB interpreter though - it can be
reproduced through LLDB-MI and when using SB API, but not when we
interpreter command "continue" is executed. Honestly, I didn't fully
understand why it works in interpreter, I did found that bug "fixes"
itself if I enable DEBUG_STACK_FRAMES in StackFrameList.cpp, because
that calls StackFrame::Dump and that calls
GetSymbolContext(eSymbolContextEverything), which fills the context of
frame on the first breakpoint, therefore it doesn't have to be
recalculated (improperly) on a second frame. However, on first
breakpoint symbol context is calculated for the "call" line, not the
next one, therefore it should be recalculated anyway on a second
breakpoint, and it is done correctly, even though
m_behaves_like_zeroth_frame is still incorrect, as long as
GetSymbolContext(eSymbolContextEverything) has been called.
[1] 31e6dbe1c6 Fix PC adjustment in StackFrame::GetSymbolContext
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75975
Patch by Anton Kolesov <Anton.Kolesov@synopsys.com>
Ideally we'd want all shebangs to be configurable, but that's not a
viable solution. Given that lldb-dotest is already configured, we might
as well make sure it uses the correct interpreter.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76167
This patch extends the reproducers to intercept calls to FindProcesses.
During capture it serializes the ProcessInstanceInfoList returned by the
API. During replay, it returns the serialized data instead of querying
the host.
The motivation for this patch is supporting the process attach workflow
during replay. Without this change it would incorrectly look for the
inferior on the host during replay and failing if no matching process
was found.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75877
Add YAML traits for ArchSpec and ProcessInstanceInfo so they can be
serialized for the reproducers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76004
In addition to the commit rG352f16db87f583ec7f55f8028647b5fd8616111f,
this one fixes settings behavior on clearing - the setting should be
reverted to their default value, not an empty one.
Add YAML traits for the ConstString and FileSpec classes so they can be
serialized as part of ProcessInfo. The latter needs to be serializable
for the reproducers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76002
Since D75537 the test suite clears all settings before a test. This caused
two tests to fail:
lldb-api :: functionalities/inline-stepping/TestInlineStepping.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/std-function-step-into-callable/TestStdFunctionStepIntoCallable.py
The reason for that is that OptionValueRegex::Clear was setting the regex
to empty instead of the default value that was passed initially. This caused
that the target.process.thread.step-avoid-regexp setting which is used in the
tests was set to "" instead of "^std::".
This patch is just a quick fix that sets the regex back to the original value
to make the tests pass.
In total these 3 setting values have changed with D75537 and also need to be
fixed (even though they don't seem to break any tests).
target.process.thread.step-avoid-regexp (regex) -> from '^std::' to empty string
platform.module-cache-directory (file) -> from "~/.lldb/module_cache" to empty string
script-lang (enum) -> from 'default' to 'python'
offset_t is unsigned, so if the RHS is signed we get a warning from clang:
warning: comparison of integers of different signs: 'const unsigned long long' and 'const int'
Global properties are shared between debugger instances and
if a test doesn't clear changes in settings it made,
this leads to side effects in other tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75537
If a producer emits a nonzero segment size, `lldb` will silently read
incorrect values and crash, or do something worse later as the tuple
size is expected to be 2, rather than 3.
Neither LLVM, nor GCC produce segmented aranges, but this dangerous case
should still be checked and handled.
Reviewed by: clayborg, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75925
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Most clients of SourceManager.h need to do things like turning source
locations into file & line number pairs, but this doesn't require
bringing in FileManager.h and LLVM's FS headers.
The main code change here is to sink SM::createFileID into the cpp file.
I reason that this is not performance critical because it doesn't happen
on the diagnostic path, it happens along the paths of macro expansion
(could be hot) and new includes (less hot).
Saves some includes:
309 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h
272 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/Basic/FileSystemOptions.h
271 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/VirtualFileSystem.h
267 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
266 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Chrono.h
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75406
Module.h takes 86ms to parse, mostly parsing the class itself. Avoid it
if possible. ASTContext.h depends on ExternalASTSource.h.
A few NFC changes were needed to make this possible:
- Move ASTSourceDescriptor to Module.h. This needs Module to be
complete, and seems more related to modules and AST files than
external AST sources.
- Move "import complete" bit from Module* pointer int pair to
NextLocalImport pointer. Required because PointerIntPair<Module*,...>
requires Module to be complete, and now it may not be.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75784
Badly-written code can combine an unrelated TypeSystem and opaque type
pointer into a CompilerType. This is particularly an issue in
swift-lldb. This patch adds an assertion mechanism that catches these
kinds of mistakes early. Because this is an assertion-only code path
there is not cost for release builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76011
This patch allows skipping a test based on a default setting, which is
useful when running the testsuite in different "modes" based on a
default setting. This is a feature I need for the Swift testsuite, but
I think it's generally useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75864
A couple of tests sporadically fail on these assertions, but the error
messages do not give a clue as to what has actually happened.
Improve them so that we can better understand what is going wrong.
The function consisted of a complicated set of conditions to compute the
address ranges which are to be disassembled (depending on the mode
selected by command line switches). This patch creates a separate
function for each mode, so that DoExecute is only left with the task of
figuring out how to dump the relevant ranges.
This is NFC-ish, except for one change in the error message, which is
actually an improvement.
Summary:
This is the only real unwinder, and things have been this way for quite
a long time. At this point, the class has accumulated so many features
it is unlikely that anyone will want to reimplement the whole thing.
The class is also fairly closely coupled (through UnwindPlans and
FuncUnwinders) with a lot of other lldb components that it is hard to
imagine a different unwinder implementation being substantially
different without reimplementing all of those.
The existing unwinding functionality is nonetheless fairly complex and
there is space for adding more structure to it, but I believe a more
worthwhile effort would be to take the existing UnwindLLDB class and try
to break it down and introduce extension/customization points, instead
of writing a brand new Unwind implementation.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, JDevlieghere, xiaobai
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75848
shafik