This caused non-determinism in the compiler, see command on the Phabricator
code review.
> This patch addresses a performance problem reported in PR43855, and
> present in the reapplication in in 001574938e5. It turns out that
> MachineSink will (often) move instructions to the first block that
> post-dominates the current block, and then try to sink further. This
> means if we have a lot of conditionals, we can needlessly create large
> numbers of DBG_VALUEs, one in each block the sunk instruction passes
> through.
>
> To fix this, rather than immediately sinking DBG_VALUEs, record them in
> a pass structure. When sinking is complete and instructions won't be
> sunk any further, new DBG_VALUEs are added, avoiding lots of
> intermediate DBG_VALUE $noregs being created.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70676
Summary:
Currently the describeLoadedValue() hook is assumed to describe the
value of the instruction's first explicit define. The hook will not be
called for instructions with more than one explicit define.
This commit adds a register parameter to the describeLoadedValue() hook,
and invokes the hook for all registers in the worklist.
This will allow us to for example describe instructions which produce
more than two parameters' values; e.g. Hexagon's various combine
instructions.
This also fixes situations in our downstream target where we may pass
smaller parameters in the high part of a register. If such a parameter's
value is produced by a larger copy instruction, we can't describe the
call site value using the super-register, and we instead need to know
which sub-register that should be used.
This also allows us to handle cases like this:
$ebx = [...]
$rdi = MOVSX64rr32 $ebx
$esi = MOV32rr $edi
CALL64pcrel32 @call
The hook will first be invoked for the MOV32rr instruction, which will
say that @call's second parameter (passed in $esi) is described by $edi.
As $edi is not preserved it will be added to the worklist. When we get
to the MOVSX64rr32 instruction, we need to describe two values; the
sign-extended value of $ebx -> $rdi for the first parameter, and $ebx ->
$edi for the second parameter, which is now possible.
This commit modifies the dbgcall-site-lea-interpretation.mir test case.
In the test case, the values of some 32-bit parameters were produced
with LEA64r. Perhaps we can in general cases handle such by emitting
expressions that AND out the lower 32-bits, but I have not been able to
land in a case where a LEA64r is used for a 32-bit parameter instead of
LEA64_32 from C code.
I have not found a case where it would be useful to describe parameters
using implicit defines, so in this patch the hook is still only invoked
for explicit defines of forwarding registers.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: ormris, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70431
Currently the describeLoadedValue() hook is assumed to describe the
value of the instruction's first explicit define. The hook will not be
called for instructions with more than one explicit define.
This commit adds a register parameter to the describeLoadedValue() hook,
and invokes the hook for all registers in the worklist.
This will allow us to for example describe instructions which produce
more than two parameters' values; e.g. Hexagon's various combine
instructions.
This also fixes a case in our downstream target where we may pass
smaller parameters in the high part of a register. If such a parameter's
value is produced by a larger copy instruction, we can't describe the
call site value using the super-register, and we instead need to know
which sub-register that should be used.
This also allows us to handle cases like this:
$ebx = [...]
$rdi = MOVSX64rr32 $ebx
$esi = MOV32rr $edi
CALL64pcrel32 @call
The hook will first be invoked for the MOV32rr instruction, which will
say that @call's second parameter (passed in $esi) is described by $edi.
As $edi is not preserved it will be added to the worklist. When we get
to the MOVSX64rr32 instruction, we need to describe two values; the
sign-extended value of $ebx -> $rdi for the first parameter, and $ebx ->
$edi for the second parameter, which is now possible.
This commit modifies the dbgcall-site-lea-interpretation.mir test case.
In the test case, the values of some 32-bit parameters were produced
with LEA64r. Perhaps we can in general cases handle such by emitting
expressions that AND out the lower 32-bits, but I have not been able to
land in a case where a LEA64r is used for a 32-bit parameter instead of
LEA64_32 from C code.
I have not found a case where it would be useful to describe parameters
using implicit defines, so in this patch the hook is still only invoked
for explicit defines of forwarding registers.
This patch addresses a performance problem reported in PR43855, and
present in the reapplication in in 001574938e5. It turns out that
MachineSink will (often) move instructions to the first block that
post-dominates the current block, and then try to sink further. This
means if we have a lot of conditionals, we can needlessly create large
numbers of DBG_VALUEs, one in each block the sunk instruction passes
through.
To fix this, rather than immediately sinking DBG_VALUEs, record them in
a pass structure. When sinking is complete and instructions won't be
sunk any further, new DBG_VALUEs are added, avoiding lots of
intermediate DBG_VALUE $noregs being created.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70676
Fix part of PR43855, resolving a problem that comes from the reapplication
in 001574938e5. If we have two DBG_VALUE insts in a block that specify
the location of the same variable, for example:
%0 = someinst
DBG_VALUE %0, !123, !DIExpression()
%1 = anotherinst
DBG_VALUE %1, !123, !DIExpression()
if %0 were to sink, the corresponding DBG_VALUE would sink too, past the
next DBG_VALUE, effectively re-ordering assignments. To fix this, I've
added a SeenDbgVars set recording what variable locations have been seen in
a block already (working bottom up), and now flag DBG_VALUEs that would
pass a later DBG_VALUE for the same variable.
NB, this only works for repeated DBG_VALUEs in the same basic block, the
general case involving control flow is much harder, which I've written
up in PR44117.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70672
These were:
* D58386 / f5e1b718a6 / reverted in d382a8a768
* D58238 / ee50590e16 / reverted in a8db456b53
Of which the latter has a performance regression tracked in PR43855,
fixed by D70672 / D70676, which will be committed atomically with this
reapplication.
Contains a minor difference to account for a change in the IsCopyInstr
signature.
The idea is to remove front-end analysis for the parameter's value
modification and leave it to the value tracking system. Front-end in some
cases marks a parameter as modified even the line of code that modifies the
parameter gets optimized, that implies that this will cover more entry
values even. In addition, extending the support for modified parameters
will be easier with this approach.
Since the goal is to recognize if a parameter’s value has changed, the idea
at very high level is: If we encounter a DBG_VALUE other than the entry
value one describing the same variable (parameter), we can assume that the
variable’s value has changed and we should not track its entry value any
more. That would be ideal scenario, but due to various LLVM optimizations,
a variable’s value could be just moved around from one register to another
(and there will be additional DBG_VALUEs describing the same variable), so
we have to recognize such situation (otherwise, we will lose a lot of entry
values) and salvage the debug entry value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68209
This is a re-land of D56151 / r364515 with a completely new implementation.
Once MIR code leaves SSA form and the liveness of a vreg is considered,
DBG_VALUE insts are able to refer to non-live vregs, because their
debug-uses do not contribute to liveness. This non-liveness becomes
problematic for optimizations like register coalescing, as they can't
``see'' the debug uses in the liveness analyses.
As a result registers get coalesced regardless of debug uses, and that can
lead to invalid variable locations containing unexpected values. In the
added test case, the first vreg operand of ADD32rr is merged with various
copies of the vreg (great for performance), but a DBG_VALUE of the
unmodified operand is blindly updated to the modified operand. This changes
what value the variable will appear to have in a debugger.
Fix this by changing any DBG_VALUE whose operand will be resurrected by
register coalescing to be a $noreg DBG_VALUE, i.e. give the variable no
location. This is an overapproximation as some coalesced locations are safe
(others are not) -- an extra domination analysis would be required to work
out which, and it would be better if we just don't generate non-live
DBG_VALUEs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64630
A call site parameter description of a memory operand needs to
unambiguously convey the size of the operand to prevent incorrect entry
value evaluation.
Thanks for David Stenberg for pointing this issue out!
Allow call site paramter descriptions to reference spill slots. Spill
slots are not visible to high-level LLVM IR, so they can safely be
referenced during entry value evaluation (as they cannot be clobbered by
some other function).
This gives a 5% increase in the number of call site parameter DIEs in an
LTO x86_64 build of the xnu kernel.
This reverts commit eb4c98ca3d (
[DebugInfo] Exclude memory location values as parameter entry values),
effectively reintroducing the portion of D60716 which dealt with memory
locations (authored by Djordje, Nikola, Ananth, and Ivan).
This partially addresses llvm.org/PR43343. However, not all memory
operands forwarded to callees live in spill slots. In the xnu build, it
may be possible to use an escape analysis to increase the number of call
site parameter by another 15% (more details in PR43343).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70254
This reverts commit f5e1b718a6.
PR43855 reports a performance regression with commit ee50590e. This commit
depends on the faulty one, so has to come out too.
llvm/test/DebugInfo/MIR/X86/live-debug-values-reg-copy.mir failed with
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled, causing the patch to be reverted in
rG2c496bb5309c972d59b11f05aee4782ddc087e71.
This patch relands the patch with a proper fix to the
live-debug-values-reg-copy.mir tests, by ensuring the MIR encodes the
callee-saves correctly so that the CalleeSaved info is taken from MIR
directly, rather than letting it be recalculated by the PEI pass. I've
done this by running `llc -stop-before=prologepilog` on the LLVM
IR as captured in the test files, adding the extra MOV instructions
that were manually added in the original test file, then running `llc
-run-pass=prologepilog` and finally re-added the comments for the MOV
instructions.
In the Pre-RA machine sinker, previously we were relying on all DBG_VALUEs
being immediately after the instruction that defined their operands. This
isn't a valid assumption, as a variable location change doesn't
necessarily correspond to where the value is computed. In this patch, we
collect DBG_VALUEs that might need sinking as we walk through a block,
and sink all of them if their defining instruction is sunk.
This patch adds some copy propagation too, so that if we sink a copy inst,
the now non-dominated paths can use the copy source for the variable
location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58386
When we sink DBG_VALUEs between blocks, we simply move the DBG_VALUE
instruction to below the sunk instruction. However, we should also mark
the variable as being undef at the original location, to terminate any
earlier variable location. This patch does that -- plus, if the
instruction being sunk is a copy, it attempts to propagate the copy
through the DBG_VALUE, replacing the destination with the source.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58238
Commit message from D66935:
This patch fixes a bug exposed by D65653 where a subsequent invocation
of `determineCalleeSaves` ends up with a different size for the callee
save area, leading to different frame-offsets in debug information.
In the invocation by PEI, `determineCalleeSaves` tries to determine
whether it needs to spill an extra callee-saved register to get an
emergency spill slot. To do this, it calls 'estimateStackSize' and
manually adds the size of the callee-saves to this. PEI then allocates
the spill objects for the callee saves and the remaining frame layout
is calculated accordingly.
A second invocation in LiveDebugValues causes estimateStackSize to return
the size of the stack frame including the callee-saves. Given that the
size of the callee-saves is added to this, these callee-saves are counted
twice, which leads `determineCalleeSaves` to believe the stack has
become big enough to require spilling an extra callee-save as emergency
spillslot. It then updates CalleeSavedStackSize with a larger value.
Since CalleeSavedStackSize is used in the calculation of the frame
offset in getFrameIndexReference, this leads to incorrect offsets for
variables/locals when this information is recalculated after PEI.
This patch fixes the lldb unit tests in `functionalities/thread/concurrent_events/*`
Changes after D66935:
Ensures AArch64FunctionInfo::getCalleeSavedStackSize does not return
the uninitialized CalleeSavedStackSize when running `llc` on a specific
pass where the MIR code has already been expected to have gone through PEI.
Instead, getCalleeSavedStackSize (when passed the MachineFrameInfo) will try
to recalculate the CalleeSavedStackSize from the CalleeSavedInfo. In debug
mode, the compiler will assert the recalculated size equals the cached
size as calculated through a call to determineCalleeSaves.
This fixes two tests:
test/DebugInfo/AArch64/asan-stack-vars.mir
test/DebugInfo/AArch64/compiler-gen-bbs-livedebugvalues.mir
that otherwise fail when compiled using msan.
Reviewed By: omjavaid, efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68783
llvm-svn: 375425
Summary:
Internally in LLVM's metadata we use DW_OP_entry_value operations with
the same semantics as DWARF; that is, its operand specifies the number
of bytes that the entry value covers.
At the time of emitting entry values we don't know the emitted size of
the DWARF expression that the entry value will cover. Currently the size
is hardcoded to 1 in DIExpression, and other values causes the verifier
to fail. As the size is 1, that effectively means that we can only have
valid entry values for registers that can be encoded in one byte, which
are the registers with DWARF numbers 0 to 31 (as they can be encoded as
single-byte DW_OP_reg0..DW_OP_reg31 rather than a multi-byte
DW_OP_regx). It is a bit confusing, but it seems like llvm-dwarfdump
will print an operation "correctly", even if the byte size is less than
that, which may make it seem that we emit correct DWARF for registers
with DWARF numbers > 31. If you instead use readelf for such cases, it
will interpret the number of specified bytes as a DWARF expression. This
seems like a limitation in llvm-dwarfdump.
As suggested in D66746, a way forward would be to add an internal
variant of DW_OP_entry_value, DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value, whose operand
instead specifies the number of operations that the entry value covers,
and we then translate that into the byte size at the time of emission.
In this patch that internal operation is added. This patch keeps the
limitation that a entry value can only be applied to simple register
locations, but it will fix the issue with the size operand being
incorrect for DWARF numbers > 31.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jyknight, fedor.sergeev, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67492
llvm-svn: 374881
Rather than having a mixture of location-state shared between DBG_VALUEs
and VarLoc objects in LiveDebugValues, this patch makes VarLoc the
master record of variable locations. The refactoring means that the
transfer of locations from one place to another is always a performed by
an operation on an existing VarLoc, that produces another transferred
VarLoc. DBG_VALUEs are only created at the end of LiveDebugValues, once
all locations are known. As a plus, there is now only one method where
DBG_VALUEs can be created.
The test case added covers a circumstance that is now impossible to
express in LiveDebugValues: if an already-indirect DBG_VALUE is spilt,
previously it would have been restored-from-spill as a direct DBG_VALUE.
We now don't lose this information along the way, as VarLocs always
refer back to the "original" non-transfer DBG_VALUE, and we can always
work out whether a location was "originally" indirect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67398
llvm-svn: 373727
When transfering variable locations from one place to another,
LiveDebugValues immediately creates a DBG_VALUE representing that
transfer. This causes trouble if the variable location should
subsequently be invalidated by a loop back-edge, such as in the added
test case: the transfer DBG_VALUE from a now-invalid location is used
as proof that the variable location is correct. This is effectively a
self-fulfilling prophesy.
To avoid this, defer the insertion of transfer DBG_VALUEs until after
analysis has completed. Some of those transfers are still sketchy, but
we don't propagate them into other blocks now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67393
llvm-svn: 373720
Abandon describing of loaded values due to safety concerns. Loaded
values are described as derefed memory location at caller point.
At callee we can unintentionally change that memory location which
would lead to different entry being printed value before and after
the memory location clobbering. This problem is described in
llvm.org/PR43343.
Patch by Nikola Prica
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67717
llvm-svn: 373089
This patch fixes a bug exposed by D65653 where a subsequent invocation
of `determineCalleeSaves` ends up with a different size for the callee
save area, leading to different frame-offsets in debug information.
In the invocation by PEI, `determineCalleeSaves` tries to determine
whether it needs to spill an extra callee-saved register to get an
emergency spill slot. To do this, it calls 'estimateStackSize' and
manually adds the size of the callee-saves to this. PEI then allocates
the spill objects for the callee saves and the remaining frame layout
is calculated accordingly.
A second invocation in LiveDebugValues causes estimateStackSize to return
the size of the stack frame including the callee-saves. Given that the
size of the callee-saves is added to this, these callee-saves are counted
twice, which leads `determineCalleeSaves` to believe the stack has
become big enough to require spilling an extra callee-save as emergency
spillslot. It then updates CalleeSavedStackSize with a larger value.
Since CalleeSavedStackSize is used in the calculation of the frame
offset in getFrameIndexReference, this leads to incorrect offsets for
variables/locals when this information is recalculated after PEI.
Reviewers: omjavaid, eli.friedman, thegameg, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66935
llvm-svn: 372204
Emit debug entry values using standard DWARF5 opcodes when the debugger
tuning is set to lldb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67410
llvm-svn: 371666
Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433
llvm-svn: 371608
If a stack spill location is overwritten by another spill instruction,
any variable locations pointing at that slot should be terminated. We
cannot rely on spills always being restored to registers or variable
locations being moved by a DBG_VALUE: the register allocator is entitled
to spill a value and then forget about it when it goes out of liveness.
To address this, scan for memory writes to spill locations, even those we
don't consider to be normal "spills". isSpillInstruction and
isLocationSpill distinguish the two now. After identifying spill
overwrites, terminate the open range, and insert a $noreg DBG_VALUE for
that variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66941
llvm-svn: 371193
The missing line added by this patch ensures that only spilt variable
locations are candidates for being restored from the stack. Otherwise,
register or constant-value information can be interpreted as a spill
location, through a union.
The added regression test replicates a scenario where this occurs: the
stack load from [rsp] causes the register-location DBG_VALUE to be
"restored" to rsi, when it should be left alone. See PR43058 for details.
Un x-fail a test that was suffering from this from a previous patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66895
llvm-svn: 370648
The missing line added by this patch ensures that only spilt variable
locations are candidates for being restored from the stack. Otherwise,
register or constant-value information can be interpreted as a spill
location, through a union.
The added regression test replicates a scenario where this occurs: the
stack load from [rsp] causes the register-location DBG_VALUE to be
"restored" to rsi, when it should be left alone. See PR43058 for details.
Un x-fail a test that was suffering from this from a previous patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66895
llvm-svn: 370334
The "join" method in LiveDebugValues does not attempt to join unseen
predecessor blocks if their out-locations aren't yet initialized, instead
the block should be re-visited later to see if any locations have changed
validity. However, because the set of blocks were all being "process"'d
once before "join" saw them, that logic in "join" was actually ignoring
legitimate out-locations on the first pass through. This meant that some
invalidated locations were not removed from the head of loops, allowing
illegal locations to persist.
Fix this by removing the run of "process" before the main join/process loop
in ExtendRanges. Now the unseen predecessors that "join" skips truly are
uninitialized, and we come back to the block at a later time to re-run
"join", see the @baz function added.
This also fixes another fault where stack/register transfers in the entry
block (or any other before-any-loop-block) had their tranfers initially
ignored, and were then never revisited. The MIR test added tests for this
behaviour.
XFail a test that exposes another bug; a fix for this is coming in D66895.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66663
llvm-svn: 370328
LiveDebugValues propagates variable locations between blocks by creating
new DBG_VALUE insts in the successors, then interpreting them when it
passes back through the block at a later time. However, this flushes out
any extra information about the location that LiveDebugValues holds: for
example, connections between variable locations such as discussed in
D65368. And as reported in PR42772 this causes us to lose track of the
fact that a spill-location is actually a spill, not a register location.
This patch fixes that by deferring the creation of propagated DBG_VALUEs
until after propagation has completed: instead location propagation occurs
only by sharing location ID numbers between blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66412
llvm-svn: 369508
Currently the machine instruction sinker identifies DBG_VALUE insts that
also need to sink by comparing register numbers. Unfortunately this isn't
safe, because (after register allocation) a DBG_VALUE may read a register
that aliases what's being sunk. To fix this, identify the DBG_VALUEs that
need to sink by recording & examining their register units. Register units
gives us the following guarantee:
"Two registers overlap if and only if they have a common register unit"
[MCRegisterInfo.h]
Thus we can always identify aliasing DBG_VALUEs if the set of register
units read by the DBG_VALUE, and the register units of the instruction
being sunk, intersect. (MachineSink already uses classes like
"LiveRegUnits" for determining sinking validity anyway).
The test added checks for super and subregister DBG_VALUE reads of a sunk
copy being sunk as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58191
llvm-svn: 369247
LiveDebugVariables can coalesce ranges of variable locations across
multiple basic blocks. However when it recreates DBG_VALUE instructions,
it has to recreate one DBG_VALUE per block, otherwise it doesn't
represent the pre-regalloc layout and variable assignments can go missing.
This feature works -- however while mucking around with LiveDebugVariables,
I commented the relevant code it out and no tests failed. Thus, here's a
test that checks LiveDebugVariables preserves DBG_VALUEs across block
boundaries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66347
llvm-svn: 369243
In r369026 we disabled spill-recognition in LiveDebugValues for anything
that has a complex expression. This is because it's hard to recover the
complex expression once the spill location is baked into it.
This patch re-enables spill-recognition and slightly adjusts the DBG_VALUE
insts that LiveDebugValues tracks: instead of tracking the last DBG_VALUE
for a variable, it tracks the last _unspilt_ DBG_VALUE. The spill-restore
code is then able to access and copy the original complex expression; but
the rest of LiveDebugValues has to be aware of the slight semantic shift,
and produce a new spilt location if a spilt location is propagated between
blocks.
The test added produces an incorrect variable location (see FIXME), which
will be the subject of future work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65368
llvm-svn: 369092
This patch avoids a crash caused by DW_OP_LLVM_fragments being dropped
from DIExpressions by LiveDebugValues spill-restore code. The appearance
of a previously unseen fragment configuration confuses LDV, as documented
in PR42773, and reproduced by the test function this patch adds (Crashes
on a x86_64 debug build).
To avoid this, on spill restore, we now use fragment information from the
spilt-location-expression.
In addition, when spilling, we now don't spill any DBG_VALUE with a complex
expression, as it can't be safely restored and will definitely lead to an
incorrect variable location. The discussion of this is in D65368.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66284
llvm-svn: 369026
Summary:
When eliminating an unreachable block we must remove any call site
information for calls residing in the block.
This was originally found on a downstream target, and the attached x86
test case was produced by hand-modifying some MIR.
Reviewers: aprantl, asowda, NikolaPrica, djtodoro, ivanbaev, vsk
Reviewed By: NikolaPrica, vsk
Subscribers: vsk, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64500
llvm-svn: 368566
Dump the DWARF information about call sites and call site parameters into
debug info sections.
The patch also provides an interface for the interpretation of instructions
that could load values of a call site parameters in order to generate DWARF
about the call site parameters.
([13/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60716
llvm-svn: 365467
Emit replacements for clobbered parameters location if the parameter
has unmodified value throughout the funciton. This is basic scenario
where we can use the debug entry values.
([12/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58042
llvm-svn: 365444
This patch addresses PR41675, where a stack-pointer variable is dereferenced
too many times by its location expression, presenting a value on the stack as
the pointer to the stack.
The difference between a stack *pointer* DBG_VALUE and one that refers to a
value on the stack, is currently the indirect flag. However the DWARF backend
will also try to guess whether something is a memory location or not, based
on whether there is any computation in the location expression. By simply
prepending the stack offset to existing expressions, we can accidentally
convert a register location into a memory location, which introduces a
suprise (and unintended) dereference.
The solution is to add DW_OP_stack_value whenever we add a DIExpression
computation to a stack *pointer*. It's an implicit location computed on the
expression stack, thus needs to be flagged as a stack_value.
For the edge case where the offset is zero and the location could be a register
location, DIExpression::prepend will still generate opcodes, and thus
DW_OP_stack_value must still be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63429
llvm-svn: 364736
Hans Wennborg