1) check whether the alignment of the memory is sufficient for the
*merged* store or load to be efficient.
Not doing so can result in some ridiculously poor code generation, if
merging creates a vector operation which must be aligned but isn't.
2) DON'T check that the alignment of each load/store is equal. If
you're merging 2 4-byte stores, the first *might* have 8-byte
alignment, but the second certainly will have 4-byte alignment. We do
want to allow those to be merged.
llvm-svn: 236850
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers,
replacing them with a single opaque pointer type.
This adds an explicit type parameter to the gep instruction so that when the
first parameter becomes an opaque pointer type, the type to gep through is
still available to the instructions.
* This doesn't modify gep operators, only instructions (operators will be
handled separately)
* Textual IR changes only. Bitcode (including upgrade) and changing the
in-memory representation will be in separate changes.
* geps of vectors are transformed as:
getelementptr <4 x float*> %x, ...
->getelementptr float, <4 x float*> %x, ...
Then, once the opaque pointer type is introduced, this will ultimately look
like:
getelementptr float, <4 x ptr> %x
with the unambiguous interpretation that it is a vector of pointers to float.
* address spaces remain on the pointer, not the type:
getelementptr float addrspace(1)* %x
->getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %x
Then, eventually:
getelementptr float, ptr addrspace(1) %x
Importantly, the massive amount of test case churn has been automated by
same crappy python code. I had to manually update a few test cases that
wouldn't fit the script's model (r228970,r229196,r229197,r229198). The
python script just massages stdin and writes the result to stdout, I
then wrapped that in a shell script to handle replacing files, then
using the usual find+xargs to migrate all the files.
update.py:
import fileinput
import sys
import re
ibrep = re.compile(r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr inbounds )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
normrep = re.compile( r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
def conv(match, line):
if not match:
return line
line = match.groups()[0]
if len(match.groups()[5]) == 0:
line += match.groups()[2]
line += match.groups()[3]
line += ", "
line += match.groups()[1]
line += "\n"
return line
for line in sys.stdin:
if line.find("getelementptr ") == line.find("getelementptr inbounds"):
if line.find("getelementptr inbounds") != line.find("getelementptr inbounds ("):
line = conv(re.match(ibrep, line), line)
elif line.find("getelementptr ") != line.find("getelementptr ("):
line = conv(re.match(normrep, line), line)
sys.stdout.write(line)
apply.sh:
for name in "$@"
do
python3 `dirname "$0"`/update.py < "$name" > "$name.tmp" && mv "$name.tmp" "$name"
rm -f "$name.tmp"
done
The actual commands:
From llvm/src:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
From llvm/src/tools/clang:
find test/ -name *.mm -o -name *.m -o -name *.cpp -o -name *.c | xargs -I '{}' ../../apply.sh "{}"
From llvm/src/tools/polly:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
After that, check-all (with llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld,
compiler-rt, and polly all checked out).
The extra 'rm' in the apply.sh script is due to a few files in clang's test
suite using interesting unicode stuff that my python script was throwing
exceptions on. None of those files needed to be migrated, so it seemed
sufficient to ignore those cases.
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7636
llvm-svn: 230786
This commit creates infinite loop in DAG combine for in the LLVM test-suite
for aarch64 with mcpu=cylcone (just having neon may be enough to expose this).
llvm-svn: 227272
This patch resolves part of PR21711 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21711 ).
The 'f3' test case in that report presents a situation where we have two 128-bit
stores extracted from a 256-bit source vector.
Instead of producing this:
vmovaps %xmm0, (%rdi)
vextractf128 $1, %ymm0, 16(%rdi)
This patch merges the 128-bit stores into a single 256-bit store:
vmovups %ymm0, (%rdi)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7208
llvm-svn: 227242
This is a 2nd try at the same optimization as http://reviews.llvm.org/D6698.
That patch was checked in at r224611, but reverted at r225031 because it
caused a failure outside of the regression tests.
The cause of the crash was not recognizing consecutive stores that have mixed
source values (loads and vector element extracts), so this patch adds a check
to bail out if any store value is not coming from a vector element extract.
This patch also refactors the shared logic of the constant source and vector
extracted elements source cases into a helper function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6850
llvm-svn: 226845
The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of
the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this
by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into
IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most
targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of
IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a
problem for two reasons:
1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr
2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used
to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable
all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again)
This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by
default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside
from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in
behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr
sinking on all targets, but further testing is required.
I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the
address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are
sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level).
llvm-svn: 206092
All changes were made by the following bash script:
find test/CodeGen -name "*.ll" | \
while read NAME; do
echo "$NAME"
grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc.*debug" $NAME && continue
grep -q "^; *RUN:.*llvm-objdump" $NAME && continue
grep -q "^; *RUN: *opt.*" $NAME && continue
TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
cp $NAME $TEMP
sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
while read FUNC; do
sed -i '' "s/;\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\):\( *\)$FUNC[:]* *\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3$FUNC:/g" $TEMP
done
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-LABEL-LABEL:/;\1-LABEL:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NEXT-LABEL:/;\1-NEXT:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-NOT-LABEL:/;\1-NOT:/" $TEMP
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)-DAG-LABEL:/;\1-DAG:/" $TEMP
mv $TEMP $NAME
done
This script catches a superset of the cases caught by the script associated with commit r186280. It initially found some false positives due to unusual constructs in a minority of tests; all such cases were disambiguated first in commit r186621.
llvm-svn: 186624
We would also like to merge sequences that involve a variable index like in the
example below.
int index = *idx++
int i0 = c[index+0];
int i1 = c[index+1];
b[0] = i0;
b[1] = i1;
By extending the parsing of the base pointer to handle dags that contain a
base, index, and offset we can handle examples like the one above.
The dag for the code above will look something like:
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (i8 load %index))))
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (i32 add (i32 signextend (i8 load %index))
(i32 1)))))
The code that parses the tree ignores the intermediate sign extensions. However,
if there is a sign extension it needs to be on all indexes.
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (add (i8 load %index)
(i8 1))))
vs
(load (i64 add (i64 copyfromreg %c)
(i64 signextend (i32 add (i32 signextend (i8 load %index))
(i32 1)))))
radar://13536387
llvm-svn: 178483
is not profitable in many cases because modern processors perform multiple stores
in parallel and merging stores prior to merging requires extra work. We handle two main cases:
1. Store of multiple consecutive constants:
q->a = 3;
q->4 = 5;
In this case we store a single legal wide integer.
2. Store of multiple consecutive loads:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
In this case we load/store either ilegal vector registers or legal wide integer registers.
llvm-svn: 165125
because moden processos can store multiple values in parallel, and preparing the consecutive store requires
some work. We only handle these cases:
1. Consecutive stores where the values and consecutive loads. For example:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
2. Consecutive stores where the values are constants. Foe example:
q->a = 4;
q->b = 5;
llvm-svn: 164910
buildbots. Original commit message:
A DAGCombine optimization for merging consecutive stores. This optimization is not profitable in many cases
because moden processos can store multiple values in parallel, and preparing the consecutive store requires
some work. We only handle these cases:
1. Consecutive stores where the values and consecutive loads. For example:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
2. Consecutive stores where the values are constants. Foe example:
q->a = 4;
q->b = 5;
llvm-svn: 164890
because moden processos can store multiple values in parallel, and preparing the consecutive store requires
some work. We only handle these cases:
1. Consecutive stores where the values and consecutive loads. For example:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
2. Consecutive stores where the values are constants. Foe example:
q->a = 4;
q->b = 5;
llvm-svn: 164885
Sanjay Patel