constructors. We perform semantic checking when creating the definition, and
this isn't needed in certain contexts (value initialization) but is in others
(default initialization). This fixes PR7948.
We add explicit code to the default initialization path to ensure the
definition is both present and valid.
Doug, please review. I think this follows your latest suggestion, and it ended
up remarkably cleaner than I anticipated. Also let me know if similar logic
should be followed for destructors and copy-constructors.
llvm-svn: 111802
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
and implicitly defined constructors. This has a number of benefits:
1. Less code.
2. Explicit and implicit constructors get the same diagnostics.
3. The AST explicitly contains constructor calls from implicit default
constructors. This allows handing some cases that previously weren't handled
correctly in IRGen without any additional code. Specifically, implicit default
constructors containing calls to constructors with default arguments are now
handled correctly.
llvm-svn: 86500
Charles Li