with notail on x86-64.
On x86-64, the epilogue code inserted before the tail jump blocks the
autoreleased return optimization.
rdar://problem/38675807
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59656
llvm-svn: 356705
Calls to this function are deleted in the ARC optimizer. However when the ARC
optimizer was updated to use intrinsics instead of functions (r349534), the corresponding
clang change (r349535) to use intrinsics missed this one so it wasn't being deleted.
llvm-svn: 349782
CodeGenFunction::EmitObjCForCollectionStmt currently emits lifetime markers for the loop variable in an inconsistent way: lifetime.start is emitted before the loop is entered, but lifetime.end is emitted inside the loop. AddressSanitizer uses these markers to track out-of-scope accesses to local variables, and we get false positives in Obj-C foreach loops (in the 2nd iteration of the loop). The markers of the loop variable need to be either both inside the loop (so that we poison and unpoison the variable in each iteration), or both outside. This patch implements the "both inside" approach.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32029
llvm-svn: 300287
Much to my surprise, '-disable-llvm-optzns' which I thought was the
magical flag I wanted to get at the raw LLVM IR coming out of Clang
deosn't do that. It still runs some passes over the IR. I don't want
that, I really want the *raw* IR coming out of Clang and I strongly
suspect everyone else using it is in the same camp.
There is actually a flag that does what I want that I didn't know about
called '-disable-llvm-passes'. I suspect many others don't know about it
either. It both does what I want and is much simpler.
This removes the confusing version and makes that spelling of the flag
an alias for '-disable-llvm-passes'. I've also moved everything in Clang
to use the 'passes' spelling as it seems both more accurate (*all* LLVM
passes are disabled, not just optimizations) and much easier to remember
and spell correctly.
This is part of simplifying how Clang drives LLVM to make it cleaner to
wire up to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047
llvm-svn: 290392
This reverts commit r234700. It turns out that the lifetime markers
were not the cause of Chromium failing but a bug which was uncovered by
optimizations exposed by the markers.
llvm-svn: 235553
Now that TailRecursionElimination has been fixed with r222354, the
threshold on size for lifetime marker insertion can be removed. This
only affects named temporary though, as the patch for unnamed temporaries
is still in progress.
My previous commit (r222993) was not handling debuginfo correctly, but
this could only be seen with some asan tests. Basically, lifetime markers
are just instrumentation for the compiler's usage and should not affect
debug information; however, the cleanup infrastructure was assuming it
contained only destructors, i.e. actual code to be executed, and was
setting the breakpoint for the end of the function to the closing '}', and
not the return statement, in order to show some destructors have been
called when leaving the function. This is wrong when the cleanups are only
lifetime markers, and this is now fixed.
llvm-svn: 234581
Now that TailRecursionElimination has been fixed with r222354, the
threshold on size for lifetime marker insertion can be removed. This
only affects named temporary though, as the patch for unnamed temporaries
is still in progress.
llvm-svn: 222993
Boostrapping LLVM+Clang+LLDB without threshold on object size for
lifetime markers insertion has shown there was no significant change
in compile time, so let the stack slot colorizer do its optimization
for all slots.
llvm-svn: 219303
to an out-parameter using the indirect-writeback conversion,
and we copied the current value of the variable to the temporary,
make sure that we register an intrinsic use of that value with
the optimizer so that the value won't get released until we have
a chance to retain it.
rdar://13195034
llvm-svn: 177813
Akira Hatanaka