live case of a switch statement when switching on a constant. This is terribly
limited, but enough to handle the trivial example included. Before we would
emit:
define void @test1(i32 %i) nounwind {
entry:
%i.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %i, i32* %i.addr, align 4
switch i32 1, label %sw.epilog [
i32 1, label %sw.bb
]
sw.bb: ; preds = %entry
%tmp = load i32* %i.addr, align 4
%inc = add nsw i32 %tmp, 1
store i32 %inc, i32* %i.addr, align 4
br label %sw.epilog
sw.epilog: ; preds = %sw.bb, %entry
switch i32 0, label %sw.epilog3 [
i32 1, label %sw.bb1
]
sw.bb1: ; preds = %sw.epilog
%tmp2 = load i32* %i.addr, align 4
%add = add nsw i32 %tmp2, 2
store i32 %add, i32* %i.addr, align 4
br label %sw.epilog3
sw.epilog3: ; preds = %sw.bb1, %sw.epilog
ret void
}
now we emit:
define void @test1(i32 %i) nounwind {
entry:
%i.addr = alloca i32, align 4
store i32 %i, i32* %i.addr, align 4
%tmp = load i32* %i.addr, align 4
%inc = add nsw i32 %tmp, 1
store i32 %inc, i32* %i.addr, align 4
ret void
}
This improves -O0 compile time (less IR to generate and shove through the code
generator) and the clever linux kernel people found a way to fail to build if we
don't do this optimization. This step isn't enough to handle the kernel case
though.
llvm-svn: 126597
nested-name-specifier, e.g.,
T::template apply<U>::
represent the dependent template name specialization as a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType, rather than a
TemplateSpecializationType with a dependent TemplateName.
llvm-svn: 126593
specifiers such as
typename T::template apply<U>
Previously, we would turn T::template apply<U> into a
TemplateSpecializationType. Then, we'd reprocess that
TemplateSpecializationType and turn it into either a
TemplateSpecializationType wrapped in an ElaboratedType (when we could
resolve "apply" to a template declaration) or a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType. We now produce the same ASTs but
without generating the intermediate TemplateSpecializationType.
The end goal here is to avoid generating TemplateSpecializationTypes
with dependent template-names, ever. We're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 126589
This successfully performs constructor lookup and verifies that a
delegating initializer is the only initializer present.
This does not perform loop detection in the initialization, but it also
doesn't codegen delegating constructors at all, so this won't cause
runtime infinite loops yet.
llvm-svn: 126552
don't let calls to such functions go down the normal type-checking path.
Test this out with __builtin_classify_type and __builtin_constant_p.
llvm-svn: 126539
This isn't totally complete. Right now scan-build uses some heuristics to determine
which checkers are enabled by default, but it cannot always tell which checkers
are not enabled.
llvm-svn: 126521
silliness, and actually use the existing facilities of raw_ostream to do
escaping.
This will also hopefully fix an assert when building with signed char
(MSVC I think).
llvm-svn: 126505
marking selected overloads into the callers. This allows a few callers
to skip it altogether (they would have anyways because they weren't
interested in successful overloads) or defer until after further checks
take place much like the check required for PR9323 to avoid marking
unused copy constructors.
llvm-svn: 126503
declarations as referenced when in fact we're not going to even form
a call in the AST. This is significant because we attempt to allow as an
extension classes with intentionally private and undefined copy
constructors to have temporaries bound to references, and so shouldn't
warn about the lack of definition for that copy constructor when the
class is internal.
Doug, John wasn't really satisfied with the presence of overloading at
all. This is a stop-gap and there may be a better solution. If you can
give me some hints for how you'd prefer to see this solved, I'll happily
switch things over.
llvm-svn: 126480
necessarily enclose the innermost normal cleanup depth, because
the top of the jump scope stack might be an EH cleanup or EH scope.
Fixes PR9303.
llvm-svn: 126472
Anders Carlsson