Summary:
Don't fold
(zext (and (load x), cst)) -> (and (zextload x), (zext cst))
if
(and (load x) cst)
will match as a zextload already and has additional users.
For example, the following IR:
%load = load i32, i32* %ptr, align 8
%load16 = and i32 %load, 65535
%load64 = zext i32 %load16 to i64
store i32 %load16, i32* %dst1, align 4
store i64 %load64, i64* %dst2, align 8
used to produce the following aarch64 code:
ldr w8, [x0]
and w9, w8, #0xffff
and x8, x8, #0xffff
str w9, [x1]
str x8, [x2]
but with this change produces the following aarch64 code:
ldrh w8, [x0]
str w8, [x1]
str x8, [x2]
Reviewers: resistor, mcrosier
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14340
llvm-svn: 252789
Summary: Inlined callsites need to be emitted in debug info so that sample profile can be annotated to the correct inlined instance.
Reviewers: dnovillo, dblaikie
Subscribers: dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14511
llvm-svn: 252768
This allows avoiding the default Expand behavior which
introduces stack usage. Bitcast the scalar and replace
the missing elements with undef.
This is covered by existing tests and used by a future
commit which makes 64-bit vectors legal types on AMDGPU.
llvm-svn: 252632
This is for AMDGPU to implement v2i64 extract as extract of
half of a v4i32.
This is covered by existing tests and used by a future
commit which makes 64-bit vectors legal types on AMDGPU.
llvm-svn: 252630
This is one of the problems noted in PR25016:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25016
and:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/090998.html
The spilling problem is independent and not addressed by this patch.
The MachineCombiner was doing reassociations that don't improve or even worsen the critical path.
This is caused by inclusion of the "slack" factor when calculating the critical path of the original
code sequence. If we don't add that, then we have a more conservative cost comparison of the old code
sequence vs. a new sequence. The more liberal calculation must be preserved, however, for the AArch64
MULADD patterns because benchmark regressions were observed without that.
The two failing test cases now have identical asm that does what we want:
a + b + c + d ---> (a + b) + (c + d)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13417
llvm-svn: 252616
For CoreCLR on Windows, stack probes must be emitted as inline sequences that probe successive stack pages
between the current stack limit and the desired new stack pointer location. This implements support for
the inline expansion on x64.
For in-body alloca probes, expansion is done during instruction lowering. For prolog probes, a stub call
is initially emitted during prolog creation, and expanded after epilog generation, to avoid complications
that arise when introducing new machine basic blocks during prolog and epilog creation.
Added a new test case, modified an existing one to exclude non-x64 coreclr (for now).
Add test case
Fix tests
llvm-svn: 252578
I'm not sure what the point of this was. I'm not sure why
you would ever define an instruction that produces an unallocatable
register class. No tests fail with this removed, and it seems like
it should be a verifier error to define such an instruction.
This was problematic for AMDGPU because it would make bad decisions
by arbitrarily changing the register class when unsetting isAllocatable
for VS_32/VS_64, which is currently set as a workaround to this problem.
AMDGPU uses the VS_32/VS_64 register classes to represent operands which
can use either VGPRs or SGPRs. When isAllocatable is unset for these,
this would need to pick either the SGPR or VGPR class and insert either
a copy we don't want, or an illegal copy we would need to deal with
later. A semi-arbitrary register class ordering decision is made in tablegen,
which resulted in always picking a VGPR class because it happens to have
more registers than the SGPR register class. We really just want to
use whatever register class the original register had.
llvm-svn: 252565
Simply perform additional report_context() calls after a report()
instead of adding more and more overloaded variations of report(). Also
improve several instances where information was output in an ad-hoc way
probably because no matching report() overload was available.
llvm-svn: 252552
For some reason we'd never run MachineVerifier on WinEH code, and you
explicitly have to ask for it with llc. I added it to a few test cases
to get some coverage.
Fixes PR25461.
llvm-svn: 252512
We don't currently have any runtime library functions for operations on
f16 values (other than conversions to and from f32 and f64), so we
should always promote it to f32, even if that is not a legal type. In
that case, the f32 values would be softened to f32 library calls.
SoftenFloatRes_FP_EXTEND now needs to check the promoted operand's type,
as it may ne a no-op or require a different library call.
getCopyFromParts and getCopyToParts now need to cope with a
floating-point value stored in a larger integer part, as is the case for
any target that needs to store an f16 value in a 32-bit integer
register.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12856
llvm-svn: 252459
Summary:
The CLR's personality routine passes these in rdx/edx, not rax/eax.
Make getExceptionPointerRegister a virtual method parameterized by
personality function to allow making this distinction.
Similarly make getExceptionSelectorRegister a virtual method parameterized
by personality function, for symmetry.
Reviewers: pgavlin, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14344
llvm-svn: 252383
Summary:
In this implementation, LiveIntervalAnalysis invents a few register
masks on basic block boundaries that preserve no registers. The nice
thing about this is that it prevents the prologue inserter from thinking
it needs to spill all XMM CSRs, because it doesn't see any explicit
physreg defs in the MI.
Reviewers: MatzeB, qcolombet, JosephTremoulet, majnemer
Subscribers: MatzeB, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14407
llvm-svn: 252318
Windows EH funclets need to always return to a single parent funclet. However, it is possible for earlier optimizations to combine funclets (probably based on one funclet having an unreachable terminator) in such a way that this condition is violated.
These changes add code to the WinEHPrepare pass to detect situations where a funclet has multiple parents and clone such funclets, fixing up the unwind and catch return edges so that each copy of the funclet returns to the correct parent funclet.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13274?id=39098
llvm-svn: 252249
Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given
function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.
For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap()
to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to
fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR
linking phase of LTO.
This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as
function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.
Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.
Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is
attached to the PR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265
llvm-svn: 252219
We already had a test for this for 32-bit SEH catchpads, but those don't
actually create funclets. We had a bug that only appeared in funclet
prologues, where we would establish EBP and ESI as our FP and BP, and
then downstream prologue code would overwrite them.
While I was at it, I fixed Win64+funclets+stackrealign. This issue
doesn't come up as often there due to the ABI requring 16 byte stack
alignment, but now we can rest easy that AVX and WinEH will work well
together =P.
llvm-svn: 252210
Also, remove an enum hack where enum values were used as indexes into an array.
We may want to make this a real class to allow pattern-based queries/customization (D13417).
llvm-svn: 252196
This is part-1 of the patch that replaces all edge weights in MBB by
probabilities, which only adds new interfaces. No functional changes.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908
llvm-svn: 252083
There is no point in having invoke safepoints handled differently than the
call safepoints. All relevant decisions could be made by looking at whether
or not gc.result and gc.relocate lay in a same basic block. This change will
allow to lower call safepoints with relocates and results in a different
basic blocks. See test case for example.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14158
llvm-svn: 252028
A profile of an LTO link of Chrome revealed that we were spending some
~30-50% of execution time in the function Constant::getRelocationInfo(),
which is called from TargetLoweringObjectFile::getKindForGlobal() and in turn
from TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix().
It turns out that we only need the result of getKindForGlobal() when
targeting Mach-O, so this change moves the relevant part of the logic to
TargetLoweringObjectFileMachO.
NFCI.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14168
llvm-svn: 252014
When push instructions are being used to pass function arguments on
the stack, and either EH or debugging are enabled, we need to generate
.cfi_adjust_cfa_offset directives appropriately. For (synch) EH, it is
enough for the CFA offset to be correct at every call site, while
for debugging we want to be correct after every push.
Darwin does not support this well, so don't use pushes whenever it
would be required.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13767
llvm-svn: 251904
ScheduleDAGInstrs doesn't behave differently before or after register
allocation. It was only used in a method of MachineSchedulerBase which
behaved differently in MachineScheduler/PostMachineScheduler. Change
this to let MachineScheduler/PostMachineScheduler just pass in a
parameter to that function.
The order of the LiveIntervals* and bool RemoveKillFlags paramters have
been switched to make out-of-tree code fail instead of unintentionally
passing a value intended for the IsPostRA flag to the (previously
following and default initialized) RemoveKillFlags.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14245
llvm-svn: 251883
This is a redo of r251849 except the tests have been split into arch-specific folders
to hopefully make the bots happy.
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
llvm-svn: 251857
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
llvm-svn: 251849
In the current BB placement algorithm, a loop chain always contains all loop blocks. This has a drawback that cold blocks in the loop may be inserted on a hot function path, hence increasing branch cost and also reducing icache locality.
Consider a simple example shown below:
A
|
B⇆C
|
D
When B->C is quite cold, the best BB-layout should be A,B,D,C. But the current implementation produces A,C,B,D.
This patch filters those cold blocks off from the loop chain by comparing the ratio:
LoopBBFreq / LoopFreq
to 20%: if it is less than 20%, we don't include this BB to the loop chain. Here LoopFreq is the frequency of the loop when we reduce the loop into a single node. In general we have more cold blocks when the loop has few iterations. And vice versa.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11662
llvm-svn: 251833
Geoff Berry