Use `MLIR_LINALG_ODS_GEN` and `MLIR_LINALG_ODS_YAML_GEN` variables
instead of `MLIR_LINALG_ODS_GEN_EXE` and `MLIR_LINALG_ODS_YAML_GEN_EXE`.
The former are defined in PARENT SCOPE only, so the `if` condition
is never evaluates to `TRUE`.
The logic should be the following (taken from tblgen part):
1. `TOOL_NAME` - CACHE variable (default equal to target name).
User can override it to actual executable path.
2. `TOOL_NAME_EXE` - internal variable, initialized to `${TOOL_NAME}` first.
In case of cross-compilation (`LLVM_USE_HOST_TOOLS == TRUE`) if user
didn't set own path to native executable via `TOOL_NAME` variable,
CMake will create separate targets to build native tool and
will override `TOOL_NAME_EXE` to the executable produced by this target.
3. `TOOL_NAME_TARGET` - internal variable, which points to tool target name.
If the native tool is built as described above, it will point to the
target correspondant to that native tool.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98025
* It was decided that this was the end of the line for the existing custom tc parser/generator, and this is the first step to replacing it with a declarative format that maps well to mathy source languages.
* One such source language is implemented here: https://github.com/stellaraccident/mlir-linalgpy/blob/main/samples/mm.py
* In fact, this is the exact source of the declarative `polymorphic_matmul` in this change.
* I am working separately to clean this python implementation up and add it to MLIR (probably as `mlir.tools.linalg_opgen` or equiv). The scope of the python side is greater than just generating named ops: the ops are callable and directly emit `linalg.generic` ops fully dynamically, and this is intended to be a feature for frontends like npcomp to define custom linear algebra ops at runtime.
* There is more work required to handle full type polymorphism, especially with respect to integer formulations, since they require more specificity wrt types.
* Followups to this change will bring the new generator to feature parity with the current one and delete the current. Roughly, this involves adding support for interface declarations and attribute symbol bindings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97135
Use cross-compilation approach for `mlir-linalg-ods-gen` application
similar to TblGen tools.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94598
This reverts commit e9b87f43bd.
There are issues with macros generating macros without an obvious simple fix
so I'm going to revert this and try something different.
New projects (particularly out of tree) have a tendency to hijack the existing
llvm configuration options and build targets (add_llvm_library,
add_llvm_tool). This can lead to some confusion.
1) When querying a configuration variable, do we care about how LLVM was
configured, or how these options were configured for the out of tree project?
2) LLVM has lots of defaults, which are easy to miss
(e.g. LLVM_BUILD_TOOLS=ON). These options all need to be duplicated in the
CMakeLists.txt for the project.
In addition, with LLVM Incubators coming online, we need better ways for these
incubators to do things the "LLVM way" without alot of futzing. Ideally, this
would happen in a way that eases importing into the LLVM monorepo when
projects mature.
This patch creates some generic infrastructure in llvm/cmake/modules and
refactors MLIR to use this infrastructure. This should expand to include
add_xxx_library, which is by far the most complicated bit of building a
project correctly, since it has to deal with lots of shared library
configuration bits. (MLIR currently hijacks the LLVM infrastructure for
building libMLIR.so, so this needs to get refactored anyway.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85140
- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
Summary:
This revision adds a tool that generates the ODS and C++ implementation for "named" Linalg ops according to the [RFC discussion](https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-declarative-named-ops-in-the-linalg-dialect/745).
While the mechanisms and language aspects are by no means set in stone, this revision allows connecting the pieces end-to-end from a mathematical-like specification.
Some implementation details and short-term decisions taken for the purpose of bootstrapping and that are not set in stone include:
1. using a "[Tensor Comprehension](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04730)-inspired" syntax
2. implicit and eager discovery of dims and symbols when parsing
3. using EDSC ops to specify the computation (e.g. std_addf, std_mul_f, ...)
A followup revision will connect this tool to tablegen mechanisms and allow the emission of named Linalg ops that automatically lower to various loop forms and run end to end.
For the following "Tensor Comprehension-inspired" string:
```
def batch_matmul(A: f32(Batch, M, K), B: f32(K, N)) -> (C: f32(Batch, M, N)) {
C(b, m, n) = std_addf<k>(std_mulf(A(b, m, k), B(k, n)));
}
```
With -gen-ods-decl=1, this emits (modulo formatting):
```
def batch_matmulOp : LinalgNamedStructured_Op<"batch_matmul", [
NInputs<2>,
NOutputs<1>,
NamedStructuredOpTraits]> {
let arguments = (ins Variadic<LinalgOperand>:$views);
let results = (outs Variadic<AnyRankedTensor>:$output_tensors);
let extraClassDeclaration = [{
llvm::Optional<SmallVector<StringRef, 8>> referenceIterators();
llvm::Optional<SmallVector<AffineMap, 8>> referenceIndexingMaps();
void regionBuilder(ArrayRef<BlockArgument> args);
}];
let hasFolder = 1;
}
```
With -gen-ods-impl, this emits (modulo formatting):
```
llvm::Optional<SmallVector<StringRef, 8>> batch_matmul::referenceIterators() {
return SmallVector<StringRef, 8>{ getParallelIteratorTypeName(),
getParallelIteratorTypeName(),
getParallelIteratorTypeName(),
getReductionIteratorTypeName() };
}
llvm::Optional<SmallVector<AffineMap, 8>> batch_matmul::referenceIndexingMaps()
{
MLIRContext *context = getContext();
AffineExpr d0, d1, d2, d3;
bindDims(context, d0, d1, d2, d3);
return SmallVector<AffineMap, 8>{
AffineMap::get(4, 0, {d0, d1, d3}),
AffineMap::get(4, 0, {d3, d2}),
AffineMap::get(4, 0, {d0, d1, d2}) };
}
void batch_matmul::regionBuilder(ArrayRef<BlockArgument> args) {
using namespace edsc;
using namespace intrinsics;
ValueHandle _0(args[0]), _1(args[1]), _2(args[2]);
ValueHandle _4 = std_mulf(_0, _1);
ValueHandle _5 = std_addf(_2, _4);
(linalg_yield(ValueRange{ _5 }));
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77067
Vladislav Vinogradov