Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yuanfang Chen 4ad7685258 Revert "Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"""
This reverts commit 80a34ae311 with fixes.

Previously, since bots turning on EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are essentially turning on
MachineVerifierPass by default on X86 and the fact that
inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll and inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
are not expected to generate functioning machine code, this would go
down to `report_fatal_error` in MachineVerifierPass. Here passing
`-verify-machineinstrs=0` to make the intent explicit.
2020-02-13 10:16:06 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 17122ec10a Revert "Revert "Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`""""
This reverts commit bb51d24330.
2020-02-13 10:08:05 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen bb51d24330 Revert "Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"""
This reverts commit 80a34ae311 with fixes.

On bots llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-ubuntu and
llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian only,
llc returns 0 for these two tests unexpectedly. I tweaked the RUN line a little
bit in the hope that LIT is the culprit since this change is not in the
codepath these tests are testing.
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
2020-02-13 10:02:53 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 80a34ae311 Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`""
This reverts commit rGcd5b308b828e, rGcd5b308b828e, rG8cedf0e2994c.

There are issues to be investigated for polly bots and bots turning on
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS.
2020-02-11 20:41:53 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 8cedf0e299 Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"
Summary:
Reland D67847 after D73742 is committed. Replace `sys::Process::Exit(1)`
with `abort` in `report_fatal_error`.

After this patch, for tools turning on `CrashRecoveryContext`,
crash handler installed by `CrashRecoveryContext` is called unless
they installed a non-returning handler using `llvm::install_fatal_error_handler`
like `cc1_main` currently does.

Reviewers: rnk, MaskRay, aganea, hans, espindola, jhenderson

Subscribers: jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, steven_wu, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, PkmX, rupprecht, jocewei, jsji, Jim, dmgreen, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74456
2020-02-11 18:20:40 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 6e24c6037f Revert "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"
This reverts commit 647c3f4e47.

Got bots failure from sanitizer-windows and maybe others.
2020-01-15 17:52:25 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 647c3f4e47 [Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`
Summary:
This patch could be treated as a rebase of D33960. It also fixes PR35547.
A fix for `llvm/test/Other/close-stderr.ll` is proposed in D68164. Seems
the consensus is that the test is passing by chance and I'm not
sure how important it is for us. So it is removed like in D33960 for now.
The rest of the test fixes are just adding `--crash` flag to `not` tool.

** The reason it fixes PR35547 is

`exit` does cleanup including calling class destructor whereas `abort`
does not do any cleanup. In multithreading environment such as ThinLTO or JIT,
threads may share states which mostly are ManagedStatic<>. If faulting thread
tearing down a class when another thread is using it, there are chances of
memory corruption. This is bad 1. It will stop error reporting like pretty
stack printer; 2. The memory corruption is distracting and nondeterministic in
terms of error message, and corruption type (depending one the timing, it
could be double free, heap free after use, etc.).

Reviewers: rnk, chandlerc, zturner, sepavloff, MaskRay, espindola

Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay

Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits, MaskRay, filcab, davide, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, rupprecht, seiya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm, #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67847
2020-01-15 17:05:13 -08:00
Sander de Smalen f28e1128d9 Relanding r368987 [AArch64] Change location of frame-record within callee-save area.
Changes:
There was a condition for `!NeedsFrameRecord` missing in the assert. The
assert in question has changed to:

+    assert((!RPI.isPaired() || !NeedsFrameRecord || RPI.Reg2 != AArch64::FP ||
+            RPI.Reg1 == AArch64::LR) &&
+           "FrameRecord must be allocated together with LR");

This addresses PR43016.

llvm-svn: 369122
2019-08-16 15:42:28 +00:00
Nico Weber ee96499a42 Revert r368987, it caused PR43016.
llvm-svn: 369080
2019-08-16 02:21:21 +00:00
Sander de Smalen 643adb5576 [AArch64] Change location of frame-record within callee-save area.
This patch changes the location of the frame-record (FP, LR) to the 
bottom of the callee-saved area. According to the AAPCS the location of
the frame-record within the stackframe is unspecified (section 5.2.3 The 
Frame Pointer), so the compiler should be free to choose a different
location.

The reason for changing the location of the frame-record is to prepare
the frame for allocating an SVE area below the callee-saves. This way the 
compiler can use the VL-scaled addressing modes to directly access SVE 
objects from the frame-pointer.

            :                :   
        | stack |        | stack |
        |  args |        |  args |
        +-------+        +-------+
        |  x30  |        |  x19  |
        |  x29  |        |  x20  |
  FP -> |- - - -|        |  x21  |
        |  x19  |   ==>  |  x22  |
        |  x20  |        |- - - -|
        |  x21  |        |  x30  |
        |  x22  |        |  x29  |
        +-------+        +-------+ <- FP
        |///////|        |///////|         // realignment gap 
        |- - - -|        |- - - -|
        |spills/|        |spills/|
        | locals|        | locals|
  SP -> +-------+        +-------+ <- SP

Things to point out:
- The algorithm to find a paired register should be prevented from
  accidentally pairing some callee-saved register with LR that is not 
  FP, since they should always be paired together when the frame
  has a frame-record.
- For Darwin platforms the location of the frame-record is unchanged,
  since the unwind encoding does not allow for encoding this position
  dynamically and other tools currently depend on the former layout. 

Reviewers: efriedma, rovka, rengolin, thegameg, greened, t.p.northover

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65653

llvm-svn: 368987
2019-08-15 10:34:16 +00:00
Amara Emerson 854d10d10b [AArch64][GlobalISel] Enable GlobalISel at -O0 by default
Tests updated to explicitly use fast-isel at -O0 instead of implicitly.

This change also allows an explicit -fast-isel option to override an
implicitly enabled global-isel. Otherwise -fast-isel would have no effect at -O0.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41362

llvm-svn: 321655
2018-01-02 16:30:47 +00:00
Tim Northover 7a61316e89 AArch64: don't try to emit an add (shifted reg) for SP.
The "Add/sub (shifted reg)" instructions use the 31 encoding for xzr and wzr
rather than the SP, so we need to use different variants.

Situations where this actually comes up are rare enough (see test-case) that I
think falling back to DAG is fine.

llvm-svn: 305230
2017-06-12 20:49:53 +00:00