We use both -long-option and --long-option in tests. Switch to --long-option for consistency.
In the "llvm-readelf" mode, -long-option is discouraged as it conflicts with grouped short options and it is not accepted by GNU readelf.
While updating the tests, change llvm-readobj -s to llvm-readobj -S to reduce confusion ("s" is --section-headers in llvm-readobj but --symbols in llvm-readelf).
llvm-svn: 359649
Summary:
This change allows yaml input to control the order of implicitly added sections
(`.symtab`, `.strtab`, `.shstrtab`). The order is controlled by adding a
placeholder section of the given name to the Sections field.
This change is to support changes in D39582, where it is desirable to control
the location of the `.dynsym` section.
This reapplied version fixes:
1. use of a function call within an assert
2. failing lld test which has an unnamed section
3. incorrect section count when given an unnamed section
Additionally, one more test to cover the unnamed section failure.
Reviewers: compnerd, jakehehrlich
Reviewed By: jakehehrlich
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39749
llvm-svn: 317789
Summary:
This change allows yaml input to control the order of implicitly added sections
(`.symtab`, `.strtab`, `.shstrtab`). The order is controlled by adding a
placeholder section of the given name to the Sections field.
This change is to support changes in D39582, where it is desirable to control
the location of the `.dynsym` section.
This reapplied version fixes:
1. use of a function call within an assert
2. failing lld test which has an unnamed section
Additionally, one more test to cover the unnamed section failure.
Reviewers: compnerd, jakehehrlich
Reviewed By: jakehehrlich
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39749
llvm-svn: 317646
Summary:
This change allows yaml input to control the order of implicitly added sections
(`.symtab`, `.strtab`, `.shstrtab`). The order is controlled by adding a
placeholder section of the given name to the Sections field.
This change is to support changes in D39582, where it is desirable to control
the location of the `.dynsym` section.
Reviewers: compnerd, jakehehrlich
Reviewed By: jakehehrlich
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39749
llvm-svn: 317622