Clustering loads has caching benefits, but as far as I know there is no
advantage to clustering stores on any AMDGPU subtargets.
The disadvantage is that it tends to increase register pressure and
restricts scheduling freedom.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85530
Fix 64-bit copy to SCC by restricting the pattern resulting
in such a copy to subtargets supporting 64-bit scalar compare,
and mapping the copy to S_CMP_LG_U64.
Before introducing the S_CSELECT pattern with explicit SCC
(0045786f14), there was no need
for handling 64-bit copy to SCC ($scc = COPY sreg_64).
The proposed handling to read only the low bits was however
based on a false premise that it is only one bit that matters,
while in fact the copy source might be a vector of booleans and
all bits need to be considered.
The practical problem of mapping the 64-bit copy to SCC is that
the natural instruction to use (S_CMP_LG_U64) is not available
on old hardware. Fix it by restricting the problematic pattern
to subtargets supporting the instruction (hasScalarCompareEq64).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85207
tryLatency compares two sched candidates. For the top zone it prefers
the one with lesser depth, but only if that depth is greater than the
total latency of the instructions we've already scheduled -- otherwise
its latency would be hidden and there would be no stall.
Unfortunately it only tests the depth of one of the candidates. This can
lead to situations where the TopDepthReduce heuristic does not kick in,
but a lower priority heuristic chooses the other candidate, whose depth
*is* greater than the already scheduled latency, which causes a stall.
The fix is to apply the heuristic if the depth of *either* candidate is
greater than the already scheduled latency.
All this also applies to the BotHeightReduce heuristic in the bottom
zone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72392
Fix the division/remainder algorithm by adding a second quotient
refinement step, which is required in some cases like
0xFFFFFFFFu / 0x11111111u (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46212).
Also document, rewrite and simplify it by ensuring that we always have a
lower bound on inv(y), which simplifies the UNR step and the quotient
refinement steps.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83381
Summary:
Add patterns to select s_cselect in the isel.
Handle more cases of implicit SCC accesses in si-fix-sgpr-copies
to allow new patterns to work.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, asbirlea, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Re-commit D81925 with a bugfix D82370.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81925
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82370
Summary:
Add patterns to select s_cselect in the isel.
Handle more cases of implicit SCC accesses in si-fix-sgpr-copies
to allow new patterns to work.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, asbirlea, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81925
Summary: This change enables all kind of carry out ISD opcodes to be selected according to the node divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, arsenm, vpykhtin
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78091
Summary:
There's a lot of test case churn but the overall effect is to increase
the number of back-to-back v_sub,v_subbrev pairs, which can execute with
no delay even on gfx10.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75999
We probably want this, and I've meant to turn this on for a long
time. SC actually emits a special case to early-out for a 1
denominator, which perhaps should also be considered.
I didn't realize we were already expanding 24/32-bit division here
already. Use the available IntegerDivision utilities. This uses loops,
so produces significantly smaller code than the inline DAG expansion.
This now requires width reductions of 64-bit divisions before
introducing the expanded loops.
This helps work around missing legalization in GlobalISel for
division, which are the only remaining core instructions that didn't
work at all.
I think this is plausibly a better implementation than exists in the
DAG, although turning it on by default misses out on the constant
value optimizations and also needs benchmarking.
This was creating a select on true/false values, and then comparing
that later. This produced more work for later combines, which can be
avoided by just using the boolean values. This was copied from the
original DAG expansion, which also has the same problem. This doesn't
have a observable change using SelectionDAG, but since GlobalISel is
missing these optimizations, the final code was noticeably longer.
These have nicer expansions implemented in the DAG. Ideally we would
either directly implement all of these special expansions, or stop
expanding division in the IR.
Since natural fdiv lowering is now more conservative even with
denormals disabled, we get a slower expansion from just a plain
1.0/fdiv. Directly emit the rcp intrinsic when using it to implement
integer division to avoid a pointlessly complex sequence.
There's no reason to introduce a new, unnaturally sized value
here. This has a chance to produce worse code with
legalization. Avoids regression in a future patch.
This allows hoisting of a common code, for instance if denominator
is loop invariant. Current change is expansion only, adding licm to
the target pass list going to be a separate patch. Given this patch
changes to codegen are minor as the expansion is similar to that on
DAG. DAG expansion still must remain for R600.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48586
llvm-svn: 335868
Jay Foad