As @efriedma pointed out in D86301, this "not equal to 0 check" of
get.active.lane.mask's second operand needs to live here in Lint and not the
Verifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87228
Summary:
If two arguments are both readonly, then they have no memory dependency
that would violate noalias, even if they do actually overlap.
Reviewers: hfinkel, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits, tstellar
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60239
llvm-svn: 359047
Summary:
This change is part of step five in the series of changes to remove alignment argument from
memcpy/memmove/memset in favour of alignment attributes. In particular, this changes the Lint
analysis to cease using the old getAlignment() API of MemoryIntrinsic in favour of getting
source & dest specific alignments through the new API.
Steps:
Step 1) Remove alignment parameter and create alignment parameter attributes for
memcpy/memmove/memset. ( rL322965, rC322964, rL322963 )
Step 2) Expand the IRBuilder API to allow creation of memcpy/memmove with differing
source and dest alignments. ( rL323597 )
Step 3) Update Clang to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rC323617 )
Step 4) Update Polly to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rL323618 )
Step 5) Update LLVM passes that create memcpy/memmove calls to use the new IRBuilder API,
and those that use use MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() to use [get|set]DestAlignment()
and [get|set]SourceAlignment() instead.
Step 6) Remove the single-alignment IRBuilder API for memcpy/memmove, and the
MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() methods.
Reference
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089384.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
llvm-svn: 323886
Summary:
When using byval, the data is effectively copied as part of the call
anyway, so we aren't actually passing the pointer and thus there is no
reason to issue a warning.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40118
llvm-svn: 321478
Summary:
This fixes PR35241.
When using byval, the data is effectively copied as part of the call
anyway, so the pointer returned by the alloca will not be leaked to the
callee and thus there is no reason to issue a warning.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: Ka-Ka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40009
llvm-svn: 318279
Summary:
When checking if a constant expression is a noop cast we fetched the
IntPtrType by doing DL->getIntPtrType(V->getType())). However, there can
be cases where V doesn't return a pointer, and then getIntPtrType()
triggers an assertion.
Now we pass DataLayout to isNoopCast so the method itself can determine
what the IntPtrType is.
Reviewers: arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37894
llvm-svn: 314763
The new implementation works at least as well as the old implementation
did.
Also delete the associated preparation tests. They don't exercise
interesting corner cases of the new implementation. All the codegen
tests of the EH tables have already been ported.
llvm-svn: 249918
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.
This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
personality routine. This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
first has an operand which produces no additional information.
- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
LandingPadInst. Moving the personality routine off of any one
particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
exceptional function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429
llvm-svn: 239940
Ultimately, __CxxFrameHandler3 needs us to put a stack offset in a
table, and it will take responsibility for copying the exception object
into that slot. Modelling the exception object as an SSA value returned
by begincatch isn't going to work in general, so make it use an output
parameter.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7920
llvm-svn: 231086
Sjoerd Meijer