Motivation: we have passes with lot of rewrites and when one one them segfaults or asserts, it is very hard to find waht exactly pattern failed without debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101443
Like `print-ir-after-all` and `-before-all`, this allows to inspect IR for
debug purposes. While the former allow to inspect only between passes, this
change allows to follow the rewrites that happen within passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100940
To match an interface or trait, users currently have to use the `MatchAny` tag. This tag can be quite problematic for compile time for things like the canonicalizer, as the `MatchAny` patterns may get applied to *every* operation. This revision adds better support by bucketing interface/trait patterns based on which registered operations have them registered. This means that moving forward we will only attempt to match these patterns to operations that have this interface registered. Two simplify defining patterns that match traits and interfaces, two new utility classes have been added: OpTraitRewritePattern and OpInterfaceRewritePattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98986
This nicely aligns the naming with RewritePatternSet. This type isn't
as widely used, but we keep a using declaration in to help with
downstream consumption of this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99131
Supporting ranges in the byte code requires additional complexity, given that a range can't be easily representable as an opaque void *, as is possible with the existing bytecode value types (Attribute, Type, Value, etc.). To enable representing a range with void *, an auxillary storage is used for the actual range itself, with the pointer being passed around in the normal byte code memory. For type ranges, a TypeRange is stored. For value ranges, a ValueRange is stored. The above problem represents a majority of the complexity involved in this revision, the rest is adapting/adding byte code operations to support the changes made to the PDL interpreter in the parent revision.
After this revision, PDL will have initial end-to-end support for variadic operands/results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95723
PDL patterns are now supported via a new `PDLPatternModule` class. This class contains a ModuleOp with the pdl::PatternOp operations representing the patterns, as well as a collection of registered C++ functions for native constraints/creations/rewrites/etc. that may be invoked via the pdl patterns. Instances of this class are added to an OwningRewritePatternList in the same fashion as C++ RewritePatterns, i.e. via the `insert` method.
The PDL bytecode is an in-memory representation of the PDL interpreter dialect that can be efficiently interpreted/executed. The representation of the bytecode boils down to a code array(for opcodes/memory locations/etc) and a memory buffer(for storing attributes/operations/values/any other data necessary). The bytecode operations are effectively a 1-1 mapping to the PDLInterp dialect operations, with a few exceptions in cases where the in-memory representation of the bytecode can be more efficient than the MLIR representation. For example, a generic `AreEqual` bytecode op can be used to represent AreEqualOp, CheckAttributeOp, and CheckTypeOp.
The execution of the bytecode is split into two phases: matching and rewriting. When matching, all of the matched patterns are collected to avoid the overhead of re-running parts of the matcher. These matched patterns are then considered alongside the native C++ patterns, which rewrite immediately in-place via `RewritePattern::matchAndRewrite`, for the given root operation. When a PDL pattern is matched and has the highest benefit, it is passed back to the bytecode to execute its rewriter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89107
This class represents a rewrite pattern list that has been frozen, and thus immutable. This replaces the uses of OwningRewritePatternList in pattern driver related API, such as dialect conversion. When PDL becomes more prevalent, this API will allow for optimizing a set of patterns once without the need to do this per run of a pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89104
There are several pieces of pattern rewriting infra in IR/ that really shouldn't be there. This revision moves those pieces to a better location such that they are easier to evolve in the future(e.g. with PDL). More concretely this revision does the following:
* Create a Transforms/GreedyPatternRewriteDriver.h and move the apply*andFold methods there.
The definitions for these methods are already in Transforms/ so it doesn't make sense for the declarations to be in IR.
* Create a new lib/Rewrite library and move PatternApplicator there.
This new library will be focused on applying rewrites, and will also include compiling rewrites with PDL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89103
Mehdi Amini