Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song b159906a9a [test] Change llvm-readobj -long-option to --long-option or well-known short options. NFC
Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:

-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data

llvm-svn: 359651
2019-05-01 05:49:01 +00:00
Martin Storsjo 7a41693898 [COFF] Provide __CTOR_LIST__ and __DTOR_LIST__ symbols for MinGW
MinGW uses these kind of list terminator symbols for traversing
the constructor/destructor lists. These list terminators are
actual pointers entries in the lists, with the values 0 and
(uintptr_t)-1 (instead of just symbols pointing to the start/end
of the list).

(This mechanism exists in both the mingw-w64 crt startup code and
in libgcc; normally the mingw-w64 one is used, but a DLL build of
libgcc uses the libgcc one. Therefore it's not trivial to change
the mechanism without lots of cross-project synchronization and
potentially invalidating some combinations of old/new versions
of them.)

When mingw-w64 has been used with lld so far, the CRT startup object
files have so far provided these symbols, ending up with different,
incompatible builds of the CRT startup object files depending on
whether binutils or lld are going to be used.

In order to avoid the need of different configuration of the CRT startup
object files depending on what linker to be used, provide these symbols
in lld instead. (Mingw-w64 checks at build time whether the linker
provides these symbols or not.) This unifies this particular detail
between the two linkers.

This does disallow the use of the very latest lld with older versions
of mingw-w64 (the configure check for the list was added recently;
earlier it simply checked whether the CRT was built with gcc or clang),
and requires rebuilding the mingw-w64 CRT. But the number of users of
lld+mingw still is low enough that such a change should be tolerable,
and unifies this aspect of the toolchains, easing interoperability
between the toolchains for the future.

The actual test for this feature is added in ctors_dtors_priority.s,
but a number of other tests that checked absolute output addresses
are updated.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52053

llvm-svn: 342294
2018-09-14 22:26:59 +00:00
Martin Storsjo a55fc71614 [COFF] Write the debug directory and build id to a separate section for MinGW
For dwarf debug info, an executable normally either contains the debug
info, or it is stripped out. To reduce the storage needed (slightly)
for the debug info kept separately from the released, stripped binaries,
one can choose to only copy the debug data from the original executable
(essentially the reverse of the strip operation), producing a file with
only debug info.

When copying the debug data from an executable with GNU objcopy,
the build id and debug directory need to reside in a separate section,
as this will be kept while the rest of the .rdata section is removed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49352

llvm-svn: 337526
2018-07-20 05:44:34 +00:00
Martin Storsjo c35e4bf7eb [COFF] Don't produce base relocs for discardable sections
Dwarf debug info contains some data that contains absolute addresses.
Since these sections are discardable and aren't loaded at runtime,
there's no point in adding base relocations for them.

This makes sure that after stripping out dwarf debug info, there are no
base relocations that point to nonexistent sections.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49350

llvm-svn: 337438
2018-07-19 04:25:22 +00:00