Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stanislav Mekhanoshin a6322941ff [AMDGPU] gfx1010 VMEM and SMEM implementation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61330

llvm-svn: 359621
2019-04-30 22:08:23 +00:00
David Stuttard 20ea21c6ed [AMDGPU] Add support for immediate operand for S_ENDPGM
Summary:
Add support for immediate operand in S_ENDPGM

Change-Id: I0c56a076a10980f719fb2a8f16407e9c301013f6

Reviewers: alexshap

Subscribers: qcolombet, arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tpr, t-tye, eraman, arphaman, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59213

llvm-svn: 355902
2019-03-12 09:52:58 +00:00
Matt Arsenault 72d27f5525 AMDGPU: Fix tests using old number for constant address space
llvm-svn: 341770
2018-09-10 02:54:25 +00:00
Puyan Lotfi 43e94b15ea Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.
Discussed here:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html

In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.

llvm-svn: 323922
2018-01-31 22:04:26 +00:00
Sam Kolton 3c4933fcc6 [AMDGPU] SDWA: add support for GFX9 in peephole pass
Summary:
Added support based on merged SDWA pseudo instructions. Now peephole allow one scalar operand, omod and clamp modifiers.
Added several subtarget features for GFX9 SDWA.
This diff also contains changes from D34026.
Depends D34026

Reviewers: vpykhtin, rampitec, arsenm

Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34241

llvm-svn: 305986
2017-06-22 06:26:41 +00:00
Matt Arsenault fd02314113 AMDGPU: Start adding offset fields to flat instructions
llvm-svn: 305194
2017-06-12 15:55:58 +00:00
Tim Northover d276d85309 MIR: update test for noVRegs removal.
I think I hadn't git pulled recently enough to bring it in.

llvm-svn: 304250
2017-05-30 22:02:19 +00:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin 56ea488d8b [AMDGPU] Allow SDWA in instructions with immediates and SGPRs
An encoding does not allow to use SDWA in an instruction with
scalar operands, either literals or SGPRs. That is however possible
to copy these operands into a VGPR first.

Several copies of the value are produced if multiple SDWA conversions
were done. To cleanup MachineLICM (to hoist copies out of loops),
MachineCSE (to remove duplicate copies) and SIFoldOperands (to replace
SGPR to VGPR copy with immediate copy right to the VGPR) runs are added
after the SDWA pass.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33583

llvm-svn: 304219
2017-05-30 16:49:24 +00:00