Examples:
* Always evaluates to 0:
```
int X;
if (0 & X) return;
```
* Always evaluates to ~0:
```
int Y;
if (Y | ~0) return;
```
* The symbol is unmodified:
```
int Z;
Z &= ~0;
```
Patch by: Lilla Barancsuk!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39285
llvm-svn: 321168
Redundant Expression Checker is updated to be able to detect expressions that
contain macros. Also, other small details are modified to improve the current
implementation.
The improvements in detail are as follows:
* Binary and ternary operator expressions containing two constants, with at
least one of them from a macro, are detected and tested for redundancy.
Macro expressions are treated somewhat differently from other expressions,
because the particular values of macros can vary across builds.
They can be considered correct and intentional, even if macro values equal,
produce ranges that exclude each other or fully overlap, etc.
* The code structure is slightly modified: typos are corrected,
comments are added and some functions are renamed to improve comprehensibility,
both in the checker and the test file. A few test cases are moved to another
function.
* The checker is now able to detect redundant CXXFunctionalCastExprs as well.
A corresponding test case is added.
Patch by: Lilla Barancsuk!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38688
llvm-svn: 317570
Summary:
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34449
**Problem:**
Clang-tidy check misc-unused-parameters comments out parameter name omitting following characters (e.g. square brackets) what results in its complete removal. Compilation errors might occur after clang-tidy fix as well.
**Patch description:**
Changed removal range. The range should end after parameter name, not after whole parameter declarator (which might be followed by e.g. square brackets).
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Pawel Maciocha!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37846
llvm-svn: 313355
Summary:
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34450
**Problem:**
Clang-tidy check misc-unused-parameters omits parameter default value what results in its complete removal. Compilation errors might occur after clang-tidy fix.
**Patch description:**
Changed removal range. The range should end after parameter declarator, not after whole parameter declaration (which might contain a default value).
Reviewers: alexfh, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Pawel Maciocha!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37566
llvm-svn: 313150
Summary: "misc-noexcept-move-constructor" is better not to be issued when "-fno-exceptions" is set.
Reviewers: chh, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34002
llvm-svn: 304949
The check failed to match iterator->const_iterator conversion that is happening
at least when using the libstdc++'s vector. We might want to make it match even
more flexible patterns, if we see more false negatives.
llvm-svn: 304879
Added negated string literals to the set of IsAlwaysFalse expressions to avoid flagging of assert(!"msg").
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D33827
llvm-svn: 304657
Add a clang-tidy check for using func__/FUNCTION__ inside lambdas. This
evaluates to the string operator(), which is almost never useful and almost
certainly not what the author intended.
Patch by Bryce Liu!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33497
llvm-svn: 304570
Check BaseType before dereference.
Simplified test case is derived from Android Open Source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33430
llvm-svn: 303645
Don't traverse AST each time we need to find references to a certain function.
Traverse the AST once using RAV and cache the index of function references.
The speed up on a particular large file was about 1000x.
llvm-svn: 303230
Catch trivially true statements of the form a != 1 || a != 3. Statements like
these are likely errors. They are particularly easy to miss when handling enums:
enum State {
RUNNING,
STOPPED,
STARTING,
ENDING
}
...
if (state != RUNNING || state != STARTING)
...
Patch by Blaise Watson!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29858
llvm-svn: 298607
Summary:
There is no need for triggering warning when noexcept specifier in move constructor or move-assignment operator is neither evaluated nor uninstantiated.
This fixes bug reported here: bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24712
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JonasToth, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Marek Jenda!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31049
llvm-svn: 298101
Summary:
I've added a test case that (without the fix) triggers the assertion,
which happens when a move happens in an implicitly called conversion
operator.
This patch also fixes nondeterministic behavior in the source code
location reported for the move when the move is constained in an init list;
this was causing buildbot failures in the previous attempt to submit
this patch (see D30569 and rL297004).
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30650
llvm-svn: 297272
Summary:
I've added a test case that (without the fix) triggers the assertion,
which happens when a move happens in an implicitly called conversion
operator.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30569
llvm-svn: 297004
Benjamin Kramer