Modules are now Ops and, as such, can be nested. They do not produce an SSA
value so there is no possibility to refer to them in the IR. Introduce support
for symbol names attached to the module Op so that it can be referred to using
SymbolRefAttrs. The name is optional, for example the implicit top-level module
does not have a name.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 272671600
Now that modules are also operations, nothing prevents one from defining SSA
values in the module. Doing so in an implicit top-level module, i.e. outside
of a `module` operation, was leading to a crash because the implicit module was
not associated with an SSA name scope. Create a name scope before parsing the
top-level module to fix this.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 262366891
This changes the top-level module parser to handle the case where the top-level module is defined with the module operation syntax, i.e:
module ... {
}
The printer is also updated to always print the top-level module in this form. This allows for cleanly round-tripping the location and attributes of the top-level module.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 257492069
This was an arbitrary restriction caused by the way that modules were printed. Now that that has been fixed, this restriction can be removed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 257240329
The current syntax separates the name and value with ':', but ':' is already overloaded by several other things(e.g. trailing types). This makes the syntax difficult to parse in some situtations:
Old:
"foo: 10 : i32"
New:
"foo = 10 : i32"
PiperOrigin-RevId: 255097928
The ModuleOp contains a single region that must contain a single block. This block must be terminated by a new pseudo operation 'module_terminator'. The syntax for this operations is as follows:
`module` (`attributes` attr-dict)? region
Example:
module {
...
}
module attributes { ... } {
...
}
PiperOrigin-RevId: 254513752
Alex Zinenko