Summary: The same pattern as D48010, but this one is IR-canonical as of D47428.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48012
llvm-svn: 334817
Summary:
As a followup for D48007.
Since we already handle `x << (bitwidth - y) >> (bitwidth - y)` pattern,
which does not have ub for both the edge cases (`y == 0`, `y == bitwidth`),
i think also handling a pattern that is ub for `y == bitwidth` should be fine.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48010
llvm-svn: 334816
Summary:
D47980 will canonicalize the `x << (32 - y) >> (32 - y)`,
which is the pattern the AMDGPU expects to `x & (-1 >> (32 - y))`,
which is not recognized by AMDGPU.
Thus, it needs to be recognized, too.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, bogner, tstellar, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48007
llvm-svn: 334815
Summary:
The idiom recognition seems rather poor.
Only the `@bzhi32_d0` produces `v_bfe_u32`.
But they all should.
This needs to be fixed before D47980 can be re-landed.
Reviewers: mareko, bogner, rampitec, arsenm, tstellar, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48005
llvm-svn: 334398
Roman Lebedev