Force `-Werror=strict-prototypes` so that C API tests fail to compile if
we add a non-prototype declaration. This should help avoid regressions
like bddecba4b3 was fixing.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70285
rdar://problem/57203137
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Declaration and definition have slightly different names with a typo in the
declaration, which leads to a link error.
See the following bug report for more details: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39523
llvm-svn: 345960
This new JIT event listener supports generating profiling data for
the linux 'perf' profiling tool, allowing it to generate function and
instruction level profiles.
Currently this functionality is not enabled by default, but must be
enabled with LLVM_USE_PERF=yes. Given that the listener has no
dependencies, it might be sensible to enable by default once the
initial issues have been shaken out.
I followed existing precedent in registering the listener by default
in lli. Should there be a decision to enable this by default on linux,
that should probably be changed.
Please note that until https://reviews.llvm.org/D47343 is resolved,
using this functionality with mcjit rather than orcjit will not
reliably work.
Disregarding the previous comment, here's an example:
$ cat /tmp/expensive_loop.c
bool stupid_isprime(uint64_t num)
{
if (num == 2)
return true;
if (num < 1 || num % 2 == 0)
return false;
for(uint64_t i = 3; i < num / 2; i+= 2) {
if (num % i == 0)
return false;
}
return true;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int numprimes = 0;
for (uint64_t num = argc; num < 100000; num++)
{
if (stupid_isprime(num))
numprimes++;
}
return numprimes;
}
$ clang -ggdb -S -c -emit-llvm /tmp/expensive_loop.c -o
/tmp/expensive_loop.ll
$ perf record -o perf.data -g -k 1 ./bin/lli -jit-kind=mcjit /tmp/expensive_loop.ll 1
$ perf inject --jit -i perf.data -o perf.jit.data
$ perf report -i perf.jit.data
- 92.59% lli jitted-5881-2.so [.] stupid_isprime
stupid_isprime
main
llvm::MCJIT::runFunction
llvm::ExecutionEngine::runFunctionAsMain
main
__libc_start_main
0x4bf6258d4c544155
+ 0.85% lli ld-2.27.so [.] do_lookup_x
And line-level annotations also work:
│ for(uint64_t i = 3; i < num / 2; i+= 2) {
│1 30: movq $0x3,-0x18(%rbp)
0.03 │1 38: mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax
0.03 │ mov -0x10(%rbp),%rcx
│ shr $0x1,%rcx
3.63 │ ┌──cmp %rcx,%rax
│ ├──jae 6f
│ │ if (num % i == 0)
0.03 │ │ mov -0x10(%rbp),%rax
│ │ xor %edx,%edx
89.00 │ │ divq -0x18(%rbp)
│ │ cmp $0x0,%rdx
0.22 │ │↓ jne 5f
│ │ return false;
│ │ movb $0x0,-0x1(%rbp)
│ │↓ jmp 73
│ │ }
3.22 │1 5f:│↓ jmp 61
│ │ for(uint64_t i = 3; i < num / 2; i+= 2) {
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44892
llvm-svn: 337789
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Type specific declarations have been moved to Type.h and error handling
routines have been moved to ErrorHandling.h. Both are included in Core.h
so nothing should change for projects directly including the headers,
but transitive dependencies may be affected.
llvm-svn: 255965
be deleted. This will be reapplied as soon as possible and before
the 3.6 branch date at any rate.
Approved by Jim Grosbach, Lang Hames, Rafael Espindola.
This reverts commits r215111, 215115, 215116, 215117, 215136.
llvm-svn: 215154
This patch adds the target analysis passes (usually TargetTransformInfo) to the
codgen pipeline. We also expose now the AddAnalysisPasses method through the C
API, because the optimizer passes would also benefit from better target-specific
cost models.
Reviewed by Andrew Kaylor
llvm-svn: 199926
It's useful for the memory managers that are allocating a section to know what the name of the section is.
At a minimum, this is useful for low-level debugging - it's customary for JITs to be able to tell you what
memory they allocated, and as part of any such dump, they should be able to tell you some meta-data about
what each allocation is for. This allows clients that supply their own memory managers to do this.
Additionally, we also envision the SectionName being useful for passing meta-data from within LLVM to an LLVM
client.
This changes both the C and C++ APIs, and all of the clients of those APIs within LLVM. I'm assuming that
it's safe to change the C++ API because that API is allowed to change. I'm assuming that it's safe to change
the C API because we haven't shipped the API in a release yet (LLVM 3.3 doesn't include the MCJIT memory
management C API).
llvm-svn: 191804
the C API to provide their own way of allocating JIT memory (both code
and data) and finalizing memory permissions (page protections, cache
flush).
llvm-svn: 182448
the C API to provide their own way of allocating JIT memory (both code
and data) and finalizing memory permissions (page protections, cache
flush).
llvm-svn: 182408
CodeModel: It's now possible to create an MCJIT instance with any CodeModel you like. Previously it was only possible to
create an MCJIT that used CodeModel::JITDefault.
EnableFastISel: It's now possible to turn on the fast instruction selector.
The CodeModel option required some trickery. The problem is that previously, we were ensuring future binary compatibility in
the MCJITCompilerOptions by mandating that the user bzero's the options struct and passes the sizeof() that he saw; the
bindings then bzero the remaining bits. This works great but assumes that the bitwise zero equivalent of any field is a
sensible default value.
But this is not the case for LLVMCodeModel, or its internal equivalent, llvm::CodeModel::Model. In both of those, the default
for a JIT is CodeModel::JITDefault (or LLVMCodeModelJITDefault), which is not bitwise zero.
Hence this change introduces LLVMInitializeMCJITCompilerOptions(), which will initialize the user's options struct with
defaults. The user will use this in the same way that they would have previously used memset() or bzero(). MCJITCAPITest.cpp
illustrates the change, as does the comment in ExecutionEngine.h.
llvm-svn: 180893
Re-submitting with fix for OCaml dependency problems (removing dependency on SectionMemoryManager when it isn't used).
Patch by Fili Pizlo
llvm-svn: 180720
This gives a lot of love to the docs for the C API. Like Clang's
documentation, the C API is now organized into a Doxygen "module"
(LLVMC). Each C header file is a child of the main module. Some modules
(like Core) have a hierarchy of there own. The produced documentation is
thus better organized (before everything was in one monolithic list).
This patch also includes a lot of new documentation for APIs in Core.h.
It doesn't document them all, but is better than none. Function docs are
missing @param and @return annotation, but the documentation body now
commonly provides help details (like the expected llvm::Value sub-type
to expect).
llvm-svn: 153157
libraries instead of relinked objects, the interpreter, JIT, and native
target libraries were not being linked in to an ocaml program using the
ExecutionEngine.
llvm-svn: 74117
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith