to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch removes the comments following the header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54385
llvm-svn: 346625
I noticed a suspicious failure:
[ RUN ] VMRange.CollectionContains
llvm/src/tools/lldb/unittests/Utility/VMRangeTest.cpp:146: Failure
Value of: VMRange::ContainsRange(collection, VMRange(0x100, 0x104))
Actual: false
Expected: true
Looking at the code, it is a very real bug:
class RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate {
public:
RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate(VMRange range) : _range(range) {} // note that _range binds to a temporary!
bool operator()(const VMRange &range) const {
return range.Contains(_range);
}
const VMRange &_range;
};
This change fixes the bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50290
llvm-svn: 338949
This patch makes adjustments to header file includes in
lldbUtility based on recommendations by the iwyu tool
(include-what-you-use). The goal here is to make sure that
all files include the exact set of headers which are needed
for that file only, to eliminate cases of dead includes (e.g.
someone deleted some code but forgot to delete the header
includes that that code necessitated), and to eliminate the
case where header includes are picked up transitively.
llvm-svn: 299676
Chandler Carruth