This is an alternative to D99759 to avoid the compile-time explosion seen in:
https://llvm.org/PR49785
Another potential solution would make the exclusion logic stronger to avoid
blowing up, but note that we reduced the complexity of the exclusion mechanism
in D16204 because it was too costly.
So I'm questioning the need for recursion/exclusion entirely - what is the
optimization value vs. cost of recursively computing known bits based on
assumptions?
This was built into the implementation from the start with 60db058,
and we have kept adding code/cost to deal with that capability.
By clearing the query's AssumptionCache inside computeKnownBitsFromAssume(),
this patch retains all existing assume functionality except refining known
bits based on even more assumptions.
We have 1 regression test that shows a difference in optimization power.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100573
Sometimes LV has to produce really wide vectors,
and sometimes they end up being not powers of two.
As it can be seen from the diff, the cost computation
is currently completely non-sensical in those cases.
Instead of just scalarizing everything, split/factorize the wide vector
into a number of subvectors, each one having a power-of-two elements,
recurse to get the cost of op on this subvector. Also, check how we'd
legalize this subvector, and if the legalized type is scalar,
also account for the scalarization cost.
Note that for sub-vector loads, we might be able to do better,
when the vectors are properly aligned.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100099
On Windows, we want to open a file in Binary mode if OF_CRLF bit is not set. On z/OS, we want to open a file in Binary mode if the OF_Text bit is not set.
This patch creates two new functions called ChangeStdinMode and ChangeStdoutMode which will take OpenFlags as an arg to determine which mode to set stdin and stdout to. This will enable patches like https://reviews.llvm.org/D100056 to not affect Windows when setting the OF_Text flag for raw_fd_streams.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100130
D73568 removed the lit feature object-emission, because it was introduced for a
target which did not support the integrated assembler, and that target no longer
required the feature. XCore still does not support the integrated assembler,
so a build with XCore as the default target fails tests requiring
object-emission. This issue was not publicly visible because there was not a
buildbot for XCore as the default target. We fixed the failures downstream. We
now have builder clang-xcore-ubuntu-20-x64 on the staging buildmaster, which
shows the failures. We would like to make upstream build green.
Omit DebugInfo/Generic on XCore to avoid annotating 70 separate files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98508
Combine sub 0, csinc X, Y, CC to csinv -X, Y, CC providing that the
negation of X is cheap, currently just handling constants. This comes up
during the splat of an i1 to a predicate, where we now generate csetm,
as opposed to cset; rsb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99940
When Linalg named ops support was added, captures were omitted
from the body builder. This revision adds support for captures
which allows us to write FillOp in a more idiomatic fashion using
the _linalg_ops_ext mixin support.
This raises an issue in the generation of `_linalg_ops_gen.py` where
```
@property
def result(self):
return self.operation.results[0] if len(self.operation.results) > 1 else None
```.
The condition should be `== 1`.
This will be fixed in a separate commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100363
The `e_flags` for a ELF file targeting the AVR ISA contains two fields at the time of writing:
- A 7-bit integer field specifying the ISA revision being targeted
- A 1-bit flag specifying whether the object files being linked are suited for applying the relaxations at link time
The linked ELF file is blessed with the arch revision shared among all the files.
The behaviour in case of mismatch is purposefully different than the one implemented in libbfd: LLD will raise a fatal error while libbfd silently picks a default value of `avr2`.
The relaxation-ready flag is handled as done by libbfd, in order for it to appear in the linked object every source object must be tagged with it.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99754
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR41870.
Checks for newlines in option Style.EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier are now based on the formatted new lines and not on the new lines in the file.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99503
This is a workaround for PR48937. GDB can sometimes print additional
warnings which currently fails the test. Use re.search instead of
re.match to ignore this additional output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99532
Polly use algorithms from the Integer Set Library (isl), which is a library written in C and which is incompatible with the rest of the LLVM as it is written in C++.
Changes made:
- Refactoring the following methods of class `IslAst`
- `getAst()` `getRunCondition()` `buildRunCondition()`
- Removed the destructor in favor of the default one
- Change the type of the attribute `IslAst.RunCondition` to `isl::ast_expr`
- Change the type of the attribute `IslAst.Root` to `isl::ast_node`
- Change the order of attributes in class `IslAst` to reflect the data dependencies so that the destructor won't complain
- Refactoring the following methods of class `IslAstInfo`
- `getAst()` `getRunCondition()`
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100265
This patch adds new clang tool named amdgpu-arch which uses
HSA to detect installed AMDGPU and report back latter's march.
This tool is built only if system has HSA installed.
The value printed by amdgpu-arch is used to fill -march when
latter is not explicitly provided in -Xopenmp-target.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield, gregrodgers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99949
It has to save all caller-saved registers before a call in the handler.
So don't emit a call that save/restore registers.
Reviewed By: simoncook, luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100532
debugserver's MachTask::DeallocateMemory when removing an
allocate entry from our map (in resposne to an '_m' packet),
copy the size from the entry before removing it from the
map and then using the iterator to fix an ASAN error on
the bots when running TestGdbRemoteMemoryAllocation.py
rdar://76595998
The `iterator_traits` patch became too large for a concise review, so
the "bloat" —as it were— was moved into this patch. Also tests most
C++[98,17] iterator types to confirm backwards compatibility is
successful (regex iterators are intentionally not present, but directory
iterators are due to a peculiar error encountered while patching
`iterator_traits`).
Depends on D99461.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99854
Part of the code related to ds_read/ds_write ISel is refactored, and the
corresponding comment is re-written for better readability, which would help
while implementing any future ds_read/ds_write ISel related modifications.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100300
MSVC from VSCode 2017 appears unhappy with it (causes an
internal compiler error.)
This also means that we need to avoid doing `sizeof(stubCode)` as
`sizeof(int[N])` on function array parameters decays into `sizeof(int *)`.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100605
arm64_32 uses 32-bit GOT loads, so we should accept those
instructions in `ARM64Common::relaxGotLoad()` too.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100229
This could probably have been part of D99633, but I split it up to make
things a bit more reviewable. I also fixed some bugs in the implementation that
were masked through integer underflows when operating in 64-bit mode.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99823
From what I can tell, it's pretty similar to arm64. The two main differences
are:
1. No 64-bit relocations
2. Stub code writes to 32-bit registers instead of 64-bit
Plus of course the various on-disk structures like `segment_command` are using
the 32-bit instead of the 64-bit variants.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99822
This allows LLVM's LTO to internalize symbols that are not referenced
directly by regular objects. Naturally, this means we need to track
which symbols are referenced by regular objects. The approach taken here
is similar to LLD-COFF's: like the COFF port, we extend
`SymbolTable::insert()` to set the isVisibleToRegularObj bit. (LLD-ELF
relies on the Symbol constructor and `Symbol::mergeProperties()`, but
the Mach-O port does not have a `mergeProperties()` equivalent.)
From what I can tell, ld64 (which uses libLTO) doesn't do this
optimization at all. I'm not even sure libLTO provides a way to do this.
Not having ld64's behavior as a reference implementation is unfortunate;
instead, I am relying on LLD-ELF/COFF's behavior as references while
erring on the conservative side. In particular, LLD-MachO will only do
this optimization for executables right now.
We also don't attempt it when `-flat_namespace` is used -- otherwise
we'd need scan the symbol table to find matches for every un-namespaced
symbol reference, which is expensive.
internalize.ll is based off the LLD-ELF tests `internalize-basic.ll` and
`internalize-undef.ll`. Looks like @davide added some of LLD-ELF's internalize
tests, so adding him as a reviewer...
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99105
This patch clarifies the semantics of nocapture attribute.
A 'Pointer Capture' subsection is added to describe the semantics of pointer capture first.
For the nocapture example with two same pointer arguments, it is consistent with the semantics that Alive2 used to run lit tests.
Reviewed By: nlopes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97924
This is a Clang-only change and depends on the existing "musttail"
support already implemented in LLVM.
The [[clang::musttail]] attribute goes on a return statement, not
a function definition. There are several constraints that the user
must follow when using [[clang::musttail]], and these constraints
are verified by Sema.
Tail calls are supported on regular function calls, calls through a
function pointer, member function calls, and even pointer to member.
Future work would be to throw a warning if a users tries to pass
a pointer or reference to a local variable through a musttail call.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99517
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal
* LWG3446 `indirectly_readable_traits` ambiguity for types with both `value_type` and `element_type`
Depends on D99141.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99461
These were misleading, they're more of a "clear" than an "invalidate".
We shouldn't be individually clearing analysis results. Either we clear
all analyses when some IR becomes invalid, or we properly go through
invalidation.
There was only one use of this, which can be simulated with
AM.invalidate(F, PA).
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100519
Frederik Gossen