In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Summary:
This type is created on-demand and used as the base type for array
ranges. Since it is "special", its construction did not go through the
createTypeDIE function and so it was never inserted into the accelerator
table, although it clearly belongs there.
I add an explicit addAccelType call to insert it into the table.
During review, we also decided to rename the type to something more
unique to avoid confusion in case the user has own "sizetype" type. The
new name for the type size __ARRAY_SIZE_TYPE__.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45445
llvm-svn: 329705
Instead of only printing the CU-relative offset in non-verbose mode, it
makes more sense to only printed the resolved address. In verbose mode
we still print both.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44148
rdar://33525475
llvm-svn: 326903
This addresses review feedback for D42940. The topological sort is
slightly more expensive but it can now also detect cycles in the
dependencies and actually works correctly.
rdar://problem/37217988
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43036
llvm-svn: 324677
Shiva Chen