There were two problems with constant arrays whose lower bound is not 1.
First, when folding the arrays, we were creating the folded array to have lower
bounds of 1 but, we were not re-adjusting their lower bounds to the
declared values. Second, we were not calculating the extents correctly.
Both of these problems led to bogus error messages.
I fixed the first problem by adjusting the lower bounds in
NonPointerInitializationExpr() in Evaluate/check-expression.cpp. I wrote the
class ArrayConstantBoundChanger, which is similar to the existing class
ScalarConstantExpander. In the process of implementing and testing it, I found
a bug that I fixed in ScalarConstantExpander which caused it to infinitely
recurse on parenthesized expressions. I also removed the unrelated class
ScalarExpansionVisitor, which was not used.
I fixed the second problem by changing the formula that calculates upper bounds
in in the function ComputeUpperBound() in Evaluate/shape.cpp.
I added tests that trigger the bogus error messages mentioned above along with
a constant folding tests that uses array operands with shapes that conform but
have different bounds.
In the process of adding tests, I discovered that tests in
Evaluate/folding09.f90 and folding16.f90 were written incorrectly, and I
fixed them. This also revealed a bug in contant folding of the
intrinsic "lbounds" which I plan to fix in a later change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95449
Make the #include "file" preprocessing directive begin its
search in the same directory as the file containing the directive,
as other preprocessors and our Fortran INCLUDE statement do.
Avoid current working directory for all source files except the original.
Resolve tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95481
kernels loop and enter data had a too restrictive constraint for the wait clause.
The wait clause is allowed multiple times and not only once. This patch fix this problem.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95469
Restriction on clauses for the EXIT DATA directive were not fully correct.
This patch fixes the situation. The async, if and finalize clauses are allowed
only once.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95470
Restriction on clauses for the HOST_DATA directive were not fully correct.
This patch fixes the situation. The if and if_present clauses are allowed
only once.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95473
Ensure diagnostics from the prescanner are reported when running `flang-new -fsyntax-only` (i.e. only syntax parsing).
This keeps the diagnostics output of flang-new consistent with `f18 -fparse-only` when running the syntax parsing action, ParseSyntaxOnlyAction.
Summary of changes:
- Modify ParseSyntaxOnlyAction::ExecuteAction to report diagnostics
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95220
Split the tests from acc-clause-validity.f90 in dedicated files by directives.
The file acc-clause-validity.f90 was getting too big to be correctly maintained.
Tests are identical.
Reviewed By: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95328
Update the preprocessor regression tests to use the new driver if the new driver is built (FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER=On), otherwise the tests will still run using f18.
Summary of changes:
- Introduce %flang to the regression tests, which points to the new driver if it is built or otherwise points to f18
- Update all tests in flang/test/Preprocessing/ to use %flang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94805
Expressions emitted to module files and error messages
sometimes contain conversions of integer results of inquiry
intrinsics; these are usually not needed, and can conflict
with "int" in the user's namespace. Improve folding so that
these conversions don't appear, and do some other clean-up
in adjacent code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95172
This patch makes sure that diagnostics from the prescanner are reported
when running `flang-new -E` (i.e. only the preprocessor phase is
requested). More specifically, the `PrintPreprocessedAction` action is
updated.
With this patch we make sure that the `f18` and `flang-new` provide
identical output when running the preprocessor and the prescanner
generates diagnostics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94782
It's possible to declare deferred shape array using the POINTER
statement, for example:
POINTER :: var(:)
When analyzing POINTER declarations, we were not capturing the array
specification information, if present. I fixed this by changing the
"Post" function for "parser::PointerDecl" to check to see if the
declaration contained a "DeferredShapeSpecList". In such cases, I
analyzed the shape and used to information to declare an "ObjectEntity"
that contains the shape information rather than an "UnknownEntity".
I also added a couple of small tests that fail to compile without these
changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95080
* IsArrayElement() needs another option to control whether it
should ignore trailing component references.
* Add IsObjectPointer().
* Add const Scope& variants of IsFunction() and IsProcedure().
* Make TypeAndShape::Characterize() work with procedure bindings.
* Handle CHARACTER length in MeasureSizeInBytes().
* Fine-tune FindExternallyVisibleObject()'s handling of dummy arguments
to conform with Fortran 2018: only INTENT(IN) and dummy pointers
in pure functions signify; update two tests accordingly.
Also: resolve some stylistic inconsistencies and add a missing
"const" in the expression traversal template framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95011
F18 Clause 19.4p9 says:
The associate names of an ASSOCIATE construct have the scope of the
block.
Clause 11.3.1p1 says the ASSOCIATE statement is not itself in the block:
R1102 associate-construct is: associate-stmt block end-associate-stmt
Associate statement associations are currently fully processed from left
to right, incorrectly interposing associating entities earlier in the
list on same-named entities in the host scope.
1 program p
2 logical :: a = .false.
3 real :: b = 9.73
4 associate (b => a, a => b)
5 print*, a, b
6 end associate
7 print*, a, b
8 end
Associating names 'a' and 'b' at line 4 in this code are now both
aliased to logical host entity 'a' at line 2. This happens because the
reference to 'b' in the second association incorrectly resolves 'b' to
the entity in line 4 (already associated to 'a' at line 2), rather than
the 'b' at line 3. With bridge code to process these associations,
f18 output is:
F F
F 9.73
It should be:
9.73 F
F 9.73
To fix this, names in right-hand side selector variables/expressions
must all be resolved before any left-hand side entities are resolved.
This is done by maintaining a stack of lists of associations, rather
than a stack of associations. Each ASSOCIATE statement's list of
assocations is then visited once for right-hand side processing, and
once for left-hand side processing.
Note that other construct associations do not have this problem.
SELECT RANK and SELECT TYPE each have a single assocation, not a list.
Constraint C1113 prohibits the right-hand side of a CHANGE TEAM
association from referencing any left-hand side entity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95010
The utility routine WhyNotModifiable() needed to become more
aware of the use of pointers in data-refs; the targets of
pointer components are sometimes modifiable even when the
leftmost ("base") symbol of a data-ref is not.
Added a new unit test for WhyNotModifiable() that uses internal
READ statements (mostly), since I/O semantic checking uses
WhyNotModifiable() for all its definability checking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94849
Add Semantic checks for OpenMP 4.5 - 2.7.4 Workshare Construct.
- The structured block in a workshare construct may consist of only
scalar or array assignments, forall or where statements,
forall, where, atomic, critical or parallel constructs.
- All array assignments, scalar assignments, and masked array
assignments must be intrinsic assignments.
- The construct must not contain any user defined function calls unless
the function is ELEMENTAL.
Test cases : omp-workshare03.f90, omp-workshare04.f90, omp-workshare05.f90
Resolve test cases (omp-workshare01.f90 and omp-workshare02.f90) marked as XFAIL
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93091
Add the following standard predefinitions that f18 supports:
* `__flang__`,
* `__flang_major__`,
* `__flang_minor__`,
* `__flang_patchlevel__`
Summary of changes:
- Populate Fortran::parser::Options#predefinitions with the default
supported predefinitions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94516
Currently the new flang driver always runs in free form mode. This patch
adds support for fixed form mode detection based on the file extensions.
Like `f18`, `flang-new` will treat files ending with ".f", ".F" and
".ff" as fixed form. Additionally, ".for", ".FOR", ".fpp" and ".FPP"
file extensions are recognised as fixed form files. This is consistent
with gfortran [1]. In summary, files with the following extensions are
treated as fixed-form:
* ".f", ".F", ".ff", ".for", ".FOR", ".fpp", ".FPP"
For consistency with flang/test/lit.cfg.py and f18, this patch also adds
support for the following file extensions:
* ".ff", ".FOR", ".for", ".ff90", ".fpp", ".FPP"
This is added in flang/lib/Frontend/FrontendOptions.cpp. Additionally,
the following extensions are included:
* ".f03", ".F03", ".f08", ".F08"
This is for compatibility with gfortran [1] and other popular Fortran
compilers [2].
NOTE: internally Flang will only differentiate between fixed and free
form files. Currently Flang does not support switching between language
standards, so in this regard file extensions are irrelevant. More
specifically, both `file.f03` and `file.f18` are represented with
`Language::Fortran` (as opposed to e.g. `Language::Fortran03`).
Summary of changes:
- Set Fortran::parser::Options::sFixedForm according to the file type
- Add isFixedFormSuffix and isFreeFormSuffix helper functions to
FrontendTool/Utils.h
- Change FrontendOptions::GetInputKindForExtension to support the missing
file extensions that f18 supports and some additional ones
- FrontendActionTest.cpp is updated to make sure that the test input is
treated as free-form
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/GNU-Fortran-and-GCC.html
[2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/flang/docs/OptionComparison.md#notes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94228
Add support for option -I in the new Flang driver. This will allow for
included headers and module files in other directories, as the default
search path is currently the working folder. The behaviour of this is
consistent with the current f18 driver, where the current folder (i.e.
".") has the highest priority followed by the order of '-I's taking
priority from first to last.
Summary of changes:
- Add SearchDirectoriesFromDashI to PreprocessorOptions, to be forwarded
into the parser's searchDirectories
- Add header files and non-functional module files to be used in
regression tests. The module files are just text files and are used to
demonstrated that paths specified with `-I` are taken into account when
searching for .mod files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93453
When a reference to a generic interface occurs in a specification
expression that must be emitted to a module file, we have a problem
when the generic resolves to a function whose name is inaccessible
due to being PRIVATE or due to a conflict with another use of the
same name in the scope. In these cases, construct a new name for
the specific procedure and emit a renaming USE to the module file.
Also, relax enforcement of PRIVATE when analyzing module files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94815
The following driver invocation will generate an output file
in the same directory as the input file:
```
flang-new -fc1 -test-io test-input.f90
```
This is the desired behaviour. However, when testing we need to make
sure that we don't pollute the source directory. To this end, copy the
input file into a temporary directory before testing.
This is similar to https://reviews.llvm.org/D94243.
C843 states that "An entity with the INTENT attribute shall be a dummy
data object or a dummy procedure pointer." This change enforces that
and fixes some tests that erroneously violated this rule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94781
Semantic checks added to check the worksharing 'single' region closely nested inside a worksharing 'do' region. And also to check whether the 'do' iteration variable is a variable in 'Firstprivate' clause.
Files:
check-directive-structure.h
check-omp-structure.h
check-omp-structure.cpp
Testcases:
omp-do01-positivecase.f90
omp-do01.f90
omp-do05-positivecase.f90
omp-do05.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93205
When a use-associated procedure was included in a generic, we weren't
correctly recording that fact. The ultimate symbol was added rather than
the local symbol.
Also, improve the message emitted for the specific procedure by
mentioning the module it came from.
This fixes one of the problems in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48648.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94696
Generic type-bound interfaces for user-defined operators need to be formatted
as "OPERATOR(.op.)", not just ".op."
PRIVATE generics need to be marked as such.
Declaration ordering: when a generic interface shadows a
derived type of the same name, it needs to be emitted to the
module file at the point of definition of the derived type;
otherwise, the derived type's definition may appear after its
first use.
The module symbol for a module read from a module file needs
to be marked as coming from a module file before semantic
processing is performed on the contents of the module so that
any special handling for declarations in module files can be
properly activated.
IMPORT statements were sometimes missing for use-associated
symbols in surrounding scopes; fine-tune NeedImport().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94636
It's possible to declare an external procedure and then pass it as an
actual argument to a subprogram expecting a procedure argument. I added
tests for this and added an error message to distinguish passing an
actual argument with an implicit interface from passing an argument with
a mismatched explicit interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94505
If a module specifies default private accessibility, names that have
been use-associated are private by default. This was not reflected in
.mod files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94602
In some contexts, including the motivating case of determining whether
the expressions that define the shape of a variable are "constant expressions"
in the sense of the Fortran standard, expression rewriting via Fold()
is not necessary, and should not be required. The inquiry intrinsics LBOUND,
UBOUND, and SIZE work correctly now in specification expressions and are
classified correctly as being constant expressions (or not). Getting this right
led to a fair amount of API clean-up as a consequence, including the
folding of shapes and TypeAndShape objects, and new APIs for shapes
that do not fold for those cases where folding isn't needed. Further,
the symbol-testing predicate APIs in Evaluate/tools.h now all resolve any
associations of their symbols and work transparently on use-, host-, and
construct-association symbols; the tools used to resolve those associations have
been defined and documented more precisely, and their clients adjusted as needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94561
`CheckNoBranching` is currently handling only illegal branching out for constructs
with `Parser::Name` in them.
Extend the same for handling illegal branching out caused by `Parser::Label` based statements.
This patch could possibly solve one of the issues(typically branching out) mentioned in D92735.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93447
Remove duplicated function to check for required clauses on a directive. This was
still there from the merging of OpenACC and OpenMP common semantic checks and it can now be
removed so we use only one function.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93575
The following frontend driver invocation will generate 2 output files
in the same directory as the input files:
```
flang-new -fc1 input-1.f input-2.f
```
This is the desired behaviour. However, when testing we need to make
sure that we don't pollute the source directory. To this end, copy test
input files into a temporary directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94243
Internal subprograms have explicit interfaces. If an internal subprogram has
an alternate return, we check its explicit interface. But we were not
putting the label values of alternate returns into the actual argument.
I fixed this by changing the definition of actual arguments to be able
to contain a common::Label and putting the label for an alternate return
into the actual argument.
I also verified that we were already doing all of the semantic checking
required for alternate returns and removed a "TODO" for this.
I also added the test altreturn06.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94017
Add semantic check for most of the restrictions for the declare directive.
Reviewed By: kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92741
This patch adds a frontend action for emitting object files. While Flang
does not support code-generation, this action remains a placeholder.
This patch simply provides glue-code to connect the compiler driver
with the appropriate frontend action.
The new action is triggered with the `-c` compiler driver flag, i.e.
`flang-new -c`. This is then translated to `flang-new -fc1 -emit-obj`,
so `-emit-obj` has to be marked as supported as well.
As code-generation is not available yet, `flang-new -c` results in a
driver error:
```
error: code-generation is not available yet
```
Hopefully this will help communicating the level of available
functionality within Flang.
The definition of `emit-obj` is updated so that it can be shared between
Clang and Flang. As the original definition was enclosed within a
Clang-specific TableGen `let` statement, it is extracted into a new `let`
statement. That felt like the cleanest option.
I also commented out `-triple` in Flang::ConstructJob and updated some
comments there. This is similar to https://reviews.llvm.org/D93027. I
wanted to make sure that it's clear that we can't support `-triple`
until we have code-generation. However, once code-generation is
available we _will need_ `-triple`.
As this patch adds `-emit-obj`, the emit-obj.f90 becomes irrelevant and
is deleted. Instead, phases.f90 is added to demonstrate that users can
control compilation phases (indeed, `-c` is a phase control flag).
Reviewed By: SouraVX, clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93301
This patch adds some positive and failure tests for init and shutdown directives.
Reviewed By: kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90786
Add support for options -D and -U in the new Flang driver.
Summary of changes:
- Create PreprocessorOptions, to be used by the driver then translated
into Fortran::parser::Options
- Create CompilerInvocation::setFortranOpts to pass preprocessor
options into the parser options
- Add a dedicated method, Flang::AddPreprocessingOptions, to extract
preprocessing options from the driver arguments into the preprocessor
command arguments
Macros specified like -DName will default to definition 1.
When defining macros, the new driver will drop anything after an
end-of-line character. This is consistent with gfortran and clang, but
different to what currently f18 does. However, flang (which is a bash
wrapper for f18), also drops everything after an end-of-line character.
So gfortran-like behaviour felt like the natural choice. Test is added
to demonstrate this behaviour.
Reviewed By: awarzynski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93401
As per Flang's coding guidelines
(flang/docs/C++style.md#error-messages):
```
Messages should start with a capital letter.
```
This patch updates error messages in the driver (new and old) so that
they conform with the guideline above.
This change was suggested in one of the recent reviews:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93712. It felt like this deserved a dedicated
patch, so sending it separately.
If either `Prescan` or `Parse` generate any fatal errors, the new driver
will:
* report it (i.e. issue an error diagnostic)
* exit early
* return non-zero exit code
This behaviour is consistent with f18 (i.e. the old driver).
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93712
See OMP-5.0 2.19.5.5 task_reduction Clause.
To add a positive test case we need `taskgroup` directive which is not added hence skipping the test.
This is a dependency for `taskgroup` construct.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93105
Co-authored-by: Valentin Clement <clementval@gmail.com>
When an abstract interface is defined, add the ABSTRACT attribute to
subprogram symbols that define the interface body. Make use of that
when writing .mod files to include "abstract" on the interface statement.
Also, fix a problem with the order of symbols in a .mod file. Sometimes
a name is mentioned before the "real" declaration, e.g. in an access
statement. We want the order to be based on the real definitions. In
these cases we replace the symbol name with an identical name with a
different source location. Then by sorting based on the source location
we get symbols in the right order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93572
OpenMP 4.5 - Variables that appear in expressions for statement function definitions
may not appear in OpenMP Private, Firstprivate or Lastprivate clauses.
Test case : omp-private03.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93213
See OMP-5.0 2.19.5.5 task_reduction Clause.
To add a positive test case we need `taskgroup` directive which is not added hence skipping the test.
This is a dependency for `taskgroup` construct.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93105
We were only checking the restrictions of IMPLICIT NONE(EXTERNAL) when a
procedure name is first encountered. But it can also happen with an
existing symbol, e.g. if an external function's return type is declared
before is it called. This change adds a check in that branch too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93552
The behaviour triggered with this flag is consistent with `-fparse-only`
in `flang` (i.e. the throwaway driver). This new spelling is consistent
with Clang and gfortran, and was proposed and agreed on for the new
driver in [1].
This patch also adds some minimal logic to communicate whether the
semantic checks have failed or not. When semantic checks fail, a
frontend driver error is generated. The return code from the frontend
driver is then determined by checking the driver diagnostics - the
presence of driver errors means that the compilation has failed. This
logic is consistent with `clang -cc1`.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-November/000588.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92854
This patch add some checks for the restriction on the routine directive
and fix several issue at the same time.
Validity tests have been added in a separate file than acc-clause-validity.f90 since this one
became quite large. I plan to split the larger file once on-going review are done.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92672
Update the allowed clauses for the SERIAL construct for the new OpenACC 3.1
specification.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92123
Names in EQUIVALENCE statements are only allowed to indicate local
objects as per 19.5.1.4, paragraph 2, item (10). Thus, a name appearing
in an EQUIVALENCE statement with no corresponding declaration in the
same scope is an implicit declaration of the name. If that scope
contains an IMPLICIT NONE, it's an error.
I implemented this by adding a state variable to ScopeHandler to
indicate if we're resolving the names in an EQUIVALENCE statement and
then checked this state when resolving names. I also added a test to
the existing tests for EQUIVALENCE statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93345
Elemental intrinsic function folding was not taking the lower
bounds of constant array arguments into account; these lower bounds
can be distinct from 1 when named constants appear as arguments.
LLVM bugzilla #48437.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93321
Some operators have more than one name, e.g. operator(==), operator(.eq).
That was working correctly in generic definitions but they can also
appear in other contexts: USE statements and access statements, for
example.
This changes FindInScope to always look for each of the names for
a symbol. So an operator may be use-associated under one name but
declared private under another name and it will be the same symbol.
This replaces GenericSpecInfo::FindInScope which was only usable in
some cases.
Add a version of FindInScope() that looks in the current scope to
simplify many of the calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93344
STORAGE_SIZE() is a standard inquiry intrinsic (size in bits
of an array element of the same type as the argument); SIZEOF()
is a common extension that returns the size in bytes of its
argument; C_SIZEOF() is a renaming of SIZEOF() in module ISO_C_BINDING.
STORAGE_SIZE() and SIZEOF() are implemented via rewrites to
expressions; these expressions will be constant when the necessary
type parameters and bounds are also constant.
Code to calculate the sizes of types (with and without alignment)
was isolated into Evaluate/type.* and /characteristics.*.
Code in Semantics/compute-offsets.* to calculate sizes and alignments
of derived types' scopes was exposed so that it can be called at type
instantiation time (earlier than before) so that these inquiry intrinsics
could be called from specification expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93322
When merging use associations into a generic, we weren't handling
the case where the name that was use associated was itself a use
association. This is fixed by following that association to its
ultimate symbol (`useUltimate` in `DoAddUse`).
An example of the bug is `m12d` in `resolve17.f90`. `g` is associated
with `gc` in `m12c` which is associated with `gb` in `m12b`. It was that
last association that we weren't correctly following.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93343
Remove resolved & moot TODO comments in Common/, Parser/,
and Evaluate/. Address a pending one relating to parsing
ambiguity in DATA statement constants, handling it with
symbol table information in Semantics and adding a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93323
From OMP 5.0 [2.17.8]
Restriction:
If memory-order-clause is release,acquire, or acq_rel, list items must not be specified on the flush directive.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89879
Patch implements restrictions from 2.17.7 of OpenMP 5.0 standard for atomic Construct. Tests for the same are added.
One of the restriction
`OpenMP constructs may not be encountered during execution of an atomic region.`
Is mentioned in 5.0 standard to be a semantic restriction, but given the stricter nature of parser in F18 it's caught at parsing itself.
This patch is a next patch in series from D88965.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89583
The semantic analysis of index-names of FORALL statements looks up symbols with
the same name as the index-name. This is needed to exclude symbols that are
not objects. But if the symbol found is host-, use-, or construct-associated
with another entity, the check fails.
I fixed this by getting the root symbol of the symbol found and doing the check
on the root symbol. This required creating a non-const version of
"GetAssociationRoot()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92970
Add restriction on loop construct associated with DO CONCURRENT. Add couple of tests to ensure
clause validity checks.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92533
Define Fortran derived types that describe the characteristics
of derived types, and instantiations of parameterized derived
types, that are of relevance to the runtime language support
library. Define a suite of corresponding C++ structure types
for the runtime library to use to interpret instances of the
descriptions.
Create instances of these description types in Semantics as
static initializers for compiler-created objects in the scopes
that define or instantiate user derived types.
Delete obsolete code from earlier attempts to package runtime
type information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92802
Add couple of clause validity tests for the update directive and check for
the restriction where at least self, host or device clause must appear on the directive.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92447
This patch plugs many holes in static initializer semantics, improves error
messages for default initial values and other component properties in
parameterized derived type instantiations, and cleans up several small
issues noticed during development. We now do proper scalar expansion,
folding, and type, rank, and shape conformance checking for component
default initializers in derived types and PDT instantiations.
The initial values of named constants are now guaranteed to have been folded
when installed in the symbol table, and are no longer folded or
scalar-expanded at each use in expression folding. Semantics documentation
was extended with information about the various kinds of initializations
in Fortran and when each of them are processed in the compiler.
Some necessary concomitant changes have bulked this patch out a bit:
* contextual messages attachments, which are now produced for parameterized
derived type instantiations so that the user can figure out which
instance caused a problem with a component, have been added as part
of ContextualMessages, and their implementation was debugged
* several APIs in evaluate::characteristics was changed so that a FoldingContext
is passed as an argument rather than just its intrinsic procedure table;
this affected client call sites in many files
* new tools in Evaluate/check-expression.cpp to determine when an Expr
actually is a single constant value and to validate a non-pointer
variable initializer or object component default value
* shape conformance checking has additional arguments that control
whether scalar expansion is allowed
* several now-unused functions and data members noticed and removed
* several crashes and bogus errors exposed by testing this new code
were fixed
* a -fdebug-stack-trace option to enable LLVM's stack tracing on
a crash, which might be useful in the future
TL;DR: Initialization processing does more and takes place at the right
times for all of the various kinds of things that can be initialized.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92783
Add clause validity tests for the data construct. The default clause can appear only once
and this was not enforce in the ACC.td.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91888
Add couple of clause validity tests for the update directive and check for
the restriction where at least self, host or device clause must appear on the directive.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92447
We were keeping the state of parsed equivalence sets in the class
DeclarationVisitor. A problem happened when analyzing the the specification
part of a declaration that contained an EQUIVALENCE statement followed by an
interface block. The same DeclarationVisitor object that was created for the
outer declaration was being used to analyze the specification part
of a procedure body in the interface block. When analyzing the specification
part of the procedure in the interface block, the names in the outer
declaration's EQUIVALENCE statement were erroneously compared with the names in
the arguments of the interface procedure. This resulted in a bogus error
message.
I fixed this by not checking equivalence sets when we're in an interface
block. I also added a test that will produce an error message without
this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92501
When the same generic name is use-associated from two modules, the
generics are merged into a single one in the current scope. This change
fixes some bugs in that process.
When a generic is merged, it can have two specific procedures with the
same name as the generic (c.f. module m7c in modfile07.f90). We were
disallowing that by checking for duplicate names in the generic rather
than duplicate symbols. Changing `namesSeen` to `symbolsSeen` in
`ResolveSpecificsInGeneric` fixes that.
We weren't including each USE of those generics in the .mod file so in
some cases they were incorrect. Extend GenericDetails to specify all
use-associated symbols that are merged into the generic. This is used to
write out .mod files correctly.
The distinguishability check for specific procedures of a generic
sometimes have to refer to procedures from a use-associated generic in
error messages. In that case we don't have the source location of the
procedure so adapt the message to say where is was use-associated from.
This requires passing the scope through the checks to make that
determination.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92492
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.15.3.3 Private clause.
1. Pointers with the INTENT(IN) attribute may not appear in a private clause.
2. Variables that appear in namelist statements may not appear in a private clause.
A flag 'InNamelist' is added to the Symbol::Flag to identify the symbols
in Namelist statemnts.
Test cases : omp-private01.f90, omp-private02.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90210
Add semantic check for the cache directive. According to section 2.10 from the specification:
A var in a cache directive must be a single array element or a simple subarray.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90184
Semantic check added to check and restrict the value of the parameter in the COLLAPSE or ORDERED clause
if it is larger than the number of nested loops following the construct.
Test Cases:
omp-do-collapse-positivecases.f90
omp-do-collapse.f90
omp-do-ordered-positivecases.f90
omp-do-ordered.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89860
Semantic check to restrict the appearance of a variable that is part of another variable
(as an array or structure element) in a PRIVATE or SHARED clause.
Test Cases:
omp-parallel-private01.f90
omp-parallel-private02.f90
omp-parallel-private03.f90
omp-parallel-private04.f90
omp-parallel-shared01.f90
omp-parallel-shared02.f90
omp-parallel-shared03.f90
omp-parallel-shared04.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89395
This patch introduce the separate parser for the memory-order-clause from the general
OmpClauseList. This parser still creates OmpClause node and therefore can use all the feature
from TableGen and the OmpStructureChecker.
This is applied only for the Flush construct in this patch and it should be applied for
atomic as well.
This is the approach we disscussed several time during the weekly call.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91839
`OmpStructureChecker` has too much boilerplate code in source file.
This patch:
1. Use helpers from `check-directive-structure.h` and reduces the boilerplate.
2. Use TableGen infrastructure as much as possible.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90834
Add some clause validity tests for the host_data directive to avoid future regressions.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91889
Fortran defines "null-init" null pointer initializers as
being function references, syntactically, that have to resolve
to calls to the intrinsic function NULL() with no actual
arguments.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91657
When comparing LOGICAL operands using ".eq." or ".ne." we were not
guiding users to the ".eqv." and ".neqv." operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91736
When doing out-of-tree builds, FIR tests were failing. I made a change
similar to the one by @jurahul to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91654
According to section 19.4, paragraph 5, the scope of an ac-implied-do variable
is the enclosing ac-implied-do. But we were not creating new scopes upon
entry to an ac-implied-do. This was causing error messages to be erroneously
emitted.
I fixed, the code, added a test to array-constr-values.f90, added the test
folding15.f90 and corrected the test symbol05.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91560
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.13.9 Depend clause.
1. List items in depend clause should not be zero length array sections.
2. A variable that is part of another variable like structure component
should not be specified on a depend clause.
Test cases : omp-depend01.f90, omp-depend02.f90, omp-depend03.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89934
When comparing arrays whose shapes do not conform, the contant folding
code ran into problems trying to get the value of an extent that did not
exist. There were actually two problems. First, the routine
"CheckConformance()" was returning "true" when the compiler was unable
to get the extent of an array. Second, the function
"ApplyElementwise()" was calling "CheckConformance()" prior to folding
the elements of two arrays, but it was ignoring the return value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91440
An io-unit that is an internal-file-variable is syntactically identical
to a file-unit-number expression that is a variable reference. An
ambiguous unit is initially parsed as an internal-file-variable. If
semantic analysis determines that the unit is not of character type,
it is rewritten as an internal-file-variable. This modification must
retain source coordinate information.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91375
Avoid a spurious error message about a dummy procedure reference
in a specification expression by restructuring the handling of
use-associated and host-associated symbols.
Updated to fix a circular dependence between shared library
binaries that was introduced by the original patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91286
F18 clause 5.3.3 explicitly allows labels on program unit END statements.
Label resolution code accounts for this for singleton program units,
but incorrectly generates an error for host subprograms with internal
subprograms.
subroutine s(n)
call s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 88 ! incorrect error
print*, 's'
contains
subroutine s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 77 ! ok
print*, 's1'
77 end subroutine s1
88 end
Label resolution code makes a sequential pass over an entire file to
collect label information for all subprograms, followed by a pass through
that information for semantics checks. The problem is that END statements
may be separated from prior subprogram code by internal subprogram
definitions, so an END label can be associated with the wrong subprogram.
There are several ways to fix this. Labels are always local to a
subprogram. So the two separate passes over the entire file could probably
instead be interleaved to perform analysis on a subprogram as soon as the
end of the subprogram is reached, using a small stack. The stack structure
would account for the "split" code case. This might work.
It is possible that there is some not otherwise apparent advantage to
the current full-file pass design. The parse tree has productions that
provide access to a subprogram END statement "in advance". An alternative
is to access this information to solve the problem. This PR implements
this latter option.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91217
`-###` has always been supported in the new flang driver. This patch
merely makes sure that it's included when printing the help screen (i.e.
`flang-new -help`).
Avoid a spurious error message about a dummy procedure reference
in a specification expression by restructuring the handling of
use-associated and host-associated symbols.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91209
The initial approach was to go with changing parser nodes from `std::list<parser::Name>` to `OmpObjectList`, but that might have lead to illegal programs.
Resolving the symbols inside `OmpAttributeVisitor`.
Fix a couple of `XFAIL` tests.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90538
This patch add some parsing and clause validity tests for the set directive.
It makes use of the possibility introduces in patch D90770 to check the restriction
were one of the default_async, device_num and device_type clauses is required but also
not more than once on the set directive.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90771
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.15.4.1 copyin clause.
Resolve OpenMPThreadprivate directive since the list of items specified
in copyin clause should be threadprivate.
Test cases : omp-copyin01.f90, omp-copyin02.f90, omp-copyin03.f90,
omp-copyin04.f90, omp-copyin05.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89385
When the bounds of an implied DO loop in an array constructor are
constant, the index variable of that loop is considered a constant
expression and can be used as such in the items in the value list
of the implied DO loop. Since the KIND type parameter values of items
in the value list can depend on the various values taken by such an
index, it is not possible to represent those values with a single
typed expression. So implement such loops by taking multiple passes
over the parse tree of the implied DO loop instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90494
This patch implements the first frontend action for the Flang parser (i.e.
Fortran::parser). This action runs the preprocessor and is invoked with the
`-E` flag. (i.e. `flang-new -E <input-file>). The generated output is printed
to either stdout or the output file (specified with `-` or `-o <output-file>`).
Note that currently there is no mechanism to map options for the
frontend driver (i.e. Fortran::frontend::FrontendOptions) to options for
the parser (i.e. Fortran::parser::Options). Instead,
Frotran::parser::options are hard-coded to:
```
std::vector<std::string> searchDirectories{"."s};
searchDirectories = searchDirectories;
isFixedForm = false;
_encoding(Fortran::parser::Encoding::UTF_8);
```
These default settings are compatible with the current Flang driver. Further
work is required in order for CompilerInvocation to read and map
clang::driver::options to Fortran::parser::options.
Co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88381
Use `--match-full-lines` to make sure that FileCheck doesn't match the
output against the `CHECK` lines (which, like other comments, are also
printed).
More specifically, we want to make sure that the following `check` in the
input file:
```
! CHECK: <some-fortran-input>
```
is matched by FileCheck with `<some-fortran-input>` in the generated
output. Without `--match-full-lines`, that check-line will be matched
with `!CHECK: <some-fortran-input>` instead (which is also
printed together with other contents of the file).
Adding `--match-full-lines` makes the tests stricter and this change
revealed that some `check`s were passing only because that flag was
missing. These are updated accordingly.
Reviewed By: CarolineConcatto, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90306
Subclause 10.1.12 in F'2018 prohibits forward references from
a specification expression to an object declared later in the
same specification part. Catch this error better and emit
specific error messages about the violation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90492
Fortran's FINAL feature is sensitive to object rank.
When an object's rank excludes it from finalization, but
the type has FINAL subroutines for other ranks, emit
a warning. This should be especially helpful in the
case of a scalar FINAL subroutine not being declared
(IMPURE) ELEMENTAL.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90495
READ(CVAR)[,item-list] with a character variable CVAR
could be parsed as an unformatted READ from an internal
unit or as a formatted READ from the default external unit
with a needlessly parenthesized variable format. We parse
it as the former, but Fortran doesn't have unformatted
internal I/O.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90493
From below mentioned standard references
OpenACC 3.0 Standards document
840 • A program may not branch into or out of an OpenACC parallel construct
OpenMP 5.0 Standards document
A program that branches into or out of a parallel region is non-conforming.
This patch
Resolves the issue of exit out of a parallel region, other branching out issues like goto statements are not handled with this patch.
Moves code from D87906 to be reused by other OpenMP/OpenACC to check-directive-structure.h.
Adds support in OpenMP parallel construct and a test case to verify.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88655
Enter data can have the copyin clause and exit data can have the copyout clause.
Both clauses support modifier with other directive but for these two directives no modifier
are supported. This semantic check enforce this rule.
Reviewed By: kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90280
In the OpenACC specification, there are two different self clause. One for the
update directive with a var-list argument. This clause is a synonym of the host clause.
The second self clause is present for most of the compute construct and takes an optional
condition. To solve this ambiguity, the self clause for the update directive is directly
translated to a host clause during the parsing. The self clause in AccClause refers always
to the compute construct clause.
Reviewed By: kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90185
2 Bug fixes:
- Do not resolve procedure as intrinsic if they appeared in an
EXTERNAL attribute statement (one path was not considering this flag)
- Emit an error if a procedure resolved to be an intrinsic function
(resp. subroutine) is used as a subroutine (resp. function).
Lowering was attempted while the evaluate::Expression for the
call was missing without any errors.
1 behavior change:
- Do not implicitly resolve subroutines (resp. functions) as intrinsics
because their name is the name of an intrinsic function (resp.
subroutine). Add justification in documentation.
Reviewed By: klausler, tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90049
This patch introduces the dependencies required to read and manage input files
provided by the command line option. It also adds the infrastructure to create
and write to output files. The output is sent to either stdout or a file
(specified with the `-o` flag).
Separately, in order to be able to test the code for file I/O, it adds
infrastructure to create frontend actions. As a basic testable example, it adds
the `InputOutputTest` FrontendAction. The sole purpose of this action is to
read a file from the command line and print it either to stdout or the output
file. This action is run by using the `-test-io` flag also introduced in this
patch (available for `flang-new` and `flang-new -fc1`). With this patch:
```
flang-new -test-io input-file.f90
```
will read input-file.f90 and print it in the output file.
The `InputOutputTest` frontend action has been introduced primarily to
facilitate testing. It is hidden from users (i.e. it's only displayed with
`--help-hidden`). Currently Clang doesn’t have an equivalent action.
`-test-io` is used to trigger the InputOutputTest action in the Flang frontend
driver. This patch makes sure that “flang-new” forwards it to “flang-new -fc1"
by creating a preprocessor job. However, in Flang.cpp, `-test-io` is passed to
“flang-new -fc1” without `-E`. This way we make sure that the preprocessor is
_not_ run in the frontend driver. This is the desired behaviour: `-test-io`
should only read the input file and print it to the output stream.
co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87989
Remove the assumption that the path separator is `/`. Use functions from `llvm::sys::path` instead.
Reviewed By: isuruf, klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89369
I added a test to verify that the associated symbol did not have errors before
doing the anaylsis of a call to a component ref along with a test that
triggers the original problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90074
wait and atomic directives are represented by OpenACCWaitConstruct, OpenACCAtmicConstruct in the parser. Those contrsuct were
not taken into account in the semantic check so far.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88628
In my previous implementation of the semantic checks for ASSOCIATED(), I
had neglected to check the TARGET= argument for objects to ensure that
it has either the POINTER or TARGET attributes.
I added an implementation and a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89717
When processing declarations in resolve-names.cpp, we were returning a
symbol that had SubprogramName details to PushSubprogramScope(), which
expects a symbol with Subprogram details.
I adjusted the code and added a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89829
Check INTENT(OUT)/INTENT(INOUT) constraints for actual argument
of intrinsic procedure calls.
- Adding a common::Intent field to the IntrinsicDummyArgument
in the intrinsic table.
- Propagating it to the DummyDataObject intent field so that it can
later be used in CheckExplicitDataArg semantic checks.
- Add related tests.
- Fix regression (C846 false error), C846 INTENT(OUT) rule does
not apply to intrinsic call. Propagate the information that we
are in an intrinsic call up to CheckExplicitDataArg (that is
doing this check). Still enforce C846 on intrinsics other than MOVE_ALLOC (for which
allocatable coarrays are explicitly allowed) since it's not clear it is allowed in all
intrinsics and allowing this would lead to runtime penalties in the intrinsic runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89473
From OpenACC 3.0 Standards document
840 • A program may not branch into or out of an OpenACC parallel construct.
Exits are allowed provided it does not cause an exit outside the parallel region.
Test case exits out of the inner do loop, but it is still inside the parallel region.
Patch tries to extract labels from block attached to a construct,
If the exit is to a label not in the collected list then flags an error.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87906
We had neglected to check for name mismatches for procedure definitions that
appear in interfaces.
I also changed label11.f90 to an error test since I think they're better than
"FileCheck" tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89611
Calling "ASSOCATED(NULL()) was causing an internal check of the compiler to
fail.
I fixed this by changing the entry for "ASSOCIATED" in the intrinsics table to
accept "AnyPointer" which contains a new "KindCode" of "pointerType". I also
changed the function "FromActual()" to return a typeless intrinsic when called
on a pointer, which duplicates its behavior for BOZ literals. This required
changing the analysis of procedure arguments. While testing processing for
procedure arguments, I found another bad call to `CHECK()` which I fixed.
I made several other changes:
-- I implemented constant folding for ASSOCIATED().
-- I fixed handling of NULL() in relational operations.
-- I implemented semantic analysis for ASSOCIATED().
-- I noticed that the semantics for ASSOCIATED() are similar to those for
pointer assignment. So I extracted the code that pointer assignment uses
for procedure pointer compatibility to a place where it could be used by
the semantic analysis for ASSOCIATED().
-- I couldn't figure out how to make the general semantic analysis for
procedure arguments work with ASSOCIATED()'s second argument, which can
be either a pointer or a target. So I stopped using normal semantic
analysis for arguments for ASSOCIATED().
-- I added tests for all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88313
- Rework the host runtime table so that it is constexpr to avoid
having to construct it and to store/propagate it.
- Make the interface simpler (remove many templates and a file)
- Enable 16bits float folding using 32bits float host runtime
- Move StaticMultimapView into its own header to use it for host
folding
Reviewed By: klausler, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88981
The OpenMP 5.0 standard restricts nowait clause to appear only once on sections
directive.
See OpenMP 5.0
- 2.8.1
- point 3 in restrictions.
Added a test with fix.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88556
`OmpStructureChecker` is supposed to work only with `parser::OmpClause`
after tablegen changes for OpenMP and OpenACC were introduced.
Hence `OmpMemoryOrderClause`, `OmpAtomicMemoryOrderClause` and similar ones were failing
to catch semantic errors, inspite of having code for semantic checks.
This patch tries to change parser for `OmpMemoryOrderClause` and similar dependent ones
and use `OmpClauseList` which resides/comes from common tablegen for OpenMP/OpenACC eventually using `parser::OmpClause`.
This patch also tries to :
1. Change `OmpCriticalDirective` in `openmp-parsers.cpp` to support `OmpClauseList`.
2. Check-flang regresses when changes were introduced due to missing semantic checks in OmpCritical, patch implements them at the minimal level to pass the regression.
3. Change tablegen to support Hint clause.
4. Adds missing source locations `CharBlock Source` in each atomic construct.
5. Remove dead code realted to `memory-order-clauses` after moving to `OmpClauseList`.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88965
The semantics pass currently checks for several constraints
that apply to the use of whole assumed-size arrays in various
contexts, but C1002 wasn't really implemented. This patch
implements C1002 by disallowing the use of whole assumed-size
arrays in expressions and variables unless specifically
allowed by the context. This centralizes the error reporting,
which has been improved with a link to the array's declaration.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88691
This patch fix the device_num and device_type clauses used in the init clause. device_num was not
spelled correctly in the parser and was to restrictive with scalarIntConstantExpr instead of scalarIntExpr.
device_type is now taking a list of ScalarIntExpr.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88571
Currently Flang uses TextDiagnostic, TextDiagnosticPrinter &
TestDiagnosticBuffer classes from Clang (more specifically, from
libclangFrontend). This patch introduces simplified equivalents of these
classes in Flang (i.e. it removes the dependency on libclangFrontend).
Flang only needs these diagnostics classes for the compiler driver
diagnostics. This is unlike in Clang in which similar diagnostic classes
are used for e.g. Lexing/Parsing/Sema diagnostics. For this reason, the
implementations introduced here are relatively basic. We can extend them
in the future if this is required.
This patch also enhances how the diagnostics are printed. In particular,
this is the diagnostic that you'd get _before_ the changes introduced here
(no text formatting):
```
$ bin/flang-new
error: no input files
```
This is the diagnostic that you get _after_ the changes introduced here
(in terminals that support it, the text is formatted - bold + red):
```
$ bin/flang-new
flang-new: error: no input files
```
Tests are updated accordingly and options related to enabling/disabling
color diagnostics are flagged as supported by Flang.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi, CarolineConcatto
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87774
Represent FINAL subroutines in the symbol table entries of
derived types. Enforce constraints. Update tests that have
inadvertent violations or modified messages. Added a test.
The specific procedure distinguishability checking code for generics
was used to enforce distinguishability of FINAL procedures.
(Also cleaned up some confusion and redundancy noticed in the
type compatibility infrastructure while digging into that area.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88613
SAVE statement, according to 8.6.14, must apply to the same scoping
unit, that excludes nested scoping units. For example, if the SAVE
statement is found in a MODULE, the functions contained in that module
should not inherit the SAVE attribute. I think that the code was doing
this, failing the following source:
```
MODULE pippo
SAVE
CONTAINS
PURE FUNCTION fft_stick_index( )
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER :: fft_stick_index
INTEGER :: mc !error: A pure subprogram may not have a variable with the SAVE attribute
END FUNCTION
END MODULE
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88279
1. Section 2.5 : Parallel Construct
2. Section 2.7.1 : Loop Construct
3. Section 2.7.2 : Sections Construct
4. Section 2.7.3 : Single Construct
5. Section 2.7.4 : Workshare Construct
6. Section 2.8.1 : Simd Construct
7. Section 2.8.3 : Loop Simd Construct
8. Section 2.9.1 : Task Construct
9. Section 2.9.2 : Taskloop Construct
10. Section 2.9.3 : Taskloop Simd Construct
Most of the test cases added as part of this change contains semantic errors except few cases which are semantically correct but thrown a semantic error.
Currently flang is not throwing the errors for these cases and throwing semantic errors for the following correct test cases
{omp-do03.f90 , omp-loop-simd01.f90 , omp-simd02.f90 , omp-taskloop01.f90}
Hence, all the test cases are marked as XFAIL.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87908
Hew more closely to the C17 standard; perform macro replacement
of arguments to function-like macros unless they're being stringified
or pasted. Test with a model "assert" macro idiom that exposed
the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87650
According to section 9.4.1, paragraph 3,
If the starting point is greater than the ending point, the substring has
length zero
But the compilers code for substring processing was failing a call to `CHECK()`
in this case. I fixed this by just setting the number of items in the
resulting string to 0 for this situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87799
C-style /*comments*/ are removed during preprocessing directive
tokenization, but Fortran !comments need to be specifically
allowed.
Fixes LLVM bugzilla 47466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87638
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Also, once I corrected the bad dereference, the compiler was putting out
misleading error messages. The underlying error us due to violating section
7.5.10, paragraph 4, which states:
A structure constructor shall not appear before the referenced type is
defined.
I fixed this by testing to see if a type that is used in a structure
constructor is forward referenced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
Change the analyzed form of type-bound assignment to match that of call
statements. Resolve the binding name to a specific subprogram when
possible by using `GetBindingResolution`. Otherwise leave it as a
type-bound procedure call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87541
Integer case values were being compared as unsigned by operator<
on evaluate::value::Integer. Change that to signed so that overlap
can be detected correctly.
Explicit CompareUnsigned and BLT are still available if unsigned
comparison is needed.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47309
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87595
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
Summary:
This is the first patch implementing the new Flang driver as outlined in [1],
[2] & [3]. It creates Flang driver (`flang-new`) and Flang frontend driver
(`flang-new -fc1`). These will be renamed as `flang` and `flang -fc1` once the
current Flang throwaway driver, `flang`, can be replaced with `flang-new`.
Currently only 2 options are supported: `-help` and `--version`.
`flang-new` is implemented in terms of libclangDriver, defaulting the driver
mode to `FlangMode` (added to libclangDriver in [4]). This ensures that the
driver runs in Flang mode regardless of the name of the binary inferred from
argv[0].
The design of the new Flang compiler and frontend drivers is inspired by it
counterparts in Clang [3]. Currently, the new Flang compiler and frontend
drivers re-use Clang libraries: clangBasic, clangDriver and clangFrontend.
To identify Flang options, this patch adds FlangOption/FC1Option enums.
Driver::printHelp is updated so that `flang-new` prints only Flang options.
The new Flang driver is disabled by default. To enable it, set
`-DBUILD_FLANG_NEW_DRIVER=ON` when configuring CMake and add clang to
`LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS` (e.g. -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=“clang;flang;mlir”).
[1] “RFC: new Flang driver - next steps”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000470.html
[2] “RFC: Adding a fortran mode to the clang driver for flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062669.html
[3] “RFC: refactoring libclangDriver/libclangFrontend to share with Flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-July/066393.html
[4] https://reviews.llvm.org/rG6bf55804924d5a1d902925ad080b1a2b57c5c75c
co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Reviewed By: richard.barton.arm, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86089
When we define a derived type that extends another derived type, we can then
create a structure constructor that contains values for the fields of both the
child type and its parent. The compiler's internal representation of that
value contains the name of the parent type where a component name would
normally appear. This caused an assert during contant folding.
There are three cases for components that appear in structure constructors.
The first is the normal case of a component appearing in a structure
constructor for its type.
The second is a component of the parent (or grandparent) type appearing in a
structure constructor for the child type.
The third is the parent type component, which can appear in the structure
constructor of its child.
There are also cases where the component can be arrays.
I created the test case folding12.f90 that covers all of these cases and
modified the code to handle them.
Most of my changes were to the "Find()" method of the type
"StructureConstructor" where I added code to cover the second and third cases
described above. To handle these cases, I needed to create a
"StructureConstructor" for the parent type component and return it. To handle
returning a newly created "StructureConstructor", I changed the return type of
"Find()" to be "std::optional" rather than an ordinary pointer.
This change supersedes D86172.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87151
Change how generic operators and assignments are checked for
distinguishable procedures. Because of how they are invoked, available
type-bound generics and normal generics all have to be considered
together. This is different from how generic names are checked.
Move common part of checking into DistinguishabilityHelper so that it
can be used in both cases after the appropriate procedures have been
added.
Cache result of Procedure::Characterize(Symbol) in a map in
CheckHelper so that we don't have to worry about passing the
characterized Procedures around or the cost of recomputing them.
Add MakeOpName() to construct names for defined operators and assignment
for using in error messages. This eliminates the need for different
messages in those cases.
When the procedures for a defined operator or assignment are undistinguishable,
include the type name in the error message, otherwise it may be ambiguous.
Add missing check that procedures for defined operators are functions
and that their dummy arguments are INTENT(IN) or VALUE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87341
Peter Steinfeld