to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Before my change, BlockingMutex used Windows critial sections. Critical
sections can only be initialized by calling InitializeCriticalSection,
dynamically.
The primary sanitizer allocator expects to be able to reinterpret zero
initialized memory as a BlockingMutex and immediately lock it.
RegionInfo contains a mutex, and it placement new is never called for
it. These objects are accessed via:
RegionInfo *GetRegionInfo(uptr class_id) const {
DCHECK_LT(class_id, kNumClasses);
RegionInfo *regions = reinterpret_cast<RegionInfo *>(SpaceEnd());
return ®ions[class_id];
}
The memory comes from the OS without any other initialization.
For various reasons described in the comments, BlockingMutex::Lock would
check if the object appeared to be zero-initialized, and it would lazily
call the LinkerInitialized constructor to initialize the critical
section. This pattern is obviously racy, and the code had a bunch of
FIXMEs about it.
The best fix here is to use slim reader writer locks, which can start
out zero-initialized. They are available starting in Windows Vista. I
think it's safe to go ahead and use them today.
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49893
llvm-svn: 338331
Summary:
This is the first mostly working version of the Sanitizer port to 32-bit Solaris/x86.
It is currently based on Solaris 11.4 Beta.
This part was initially developed inside libsanitizer in the GCC tree and should apply to
both. Subsequent parts will address changes to clang, the compiler-rt build system
and testsuite.
I'm not yet sure what the right patch granularity is: if it's profitable to split the patch
up, I'd like to get guidance on how to do so.
Most of the changes are probably straightforward with a few exceptions:
* The Solaris syscall interface isn't stable, undocumented and can change within an
OS release. The stable interface is the libc interface, which I'm using here, if possible
using the internal _-prefixed names.
* While the patch primarily target 32-bit x86, I've left a few sparc changes in. They
cannot currently be used with clang due to a backend limitation, but have worked
fine inside the gcc tree.
* Some functions (e.g. largefile versions of functions like open64) only exist in 32-bit
Solaris, so I've introduced a separate SANITIZER_SOLARIS32 to check for that.
The patch (with the subsequent ones to be submitted shortly) was tested
on i386-pc-solaris2.11. Only a few failures remain, some of them analyzed, some
still TBD:
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/start-deactivated.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/default_options.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/MemoryMappingLayout.DumpListOfModules
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations
Maybe this is good enough the get the ball rolling.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, jyknight, kubamracek, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898
llvm-svn: 320740
Summary:
This patch unifies the behavior of BlockingMutex on linux and mac,
resolving problems that can arise when BlockingMutex is used in
code shared by the two platforms but has different behavior depending
on the platform.
No longer requires that the calling thread own the mutex for
CheckLocked calls to pass.
Reviewers: dvyukov, kubamracek
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29728
llvm-svn: 294614
Summary:
This fixes a deadlock which happens in lsan
on a large memalign-allocated chunk that resides in lsan's root set.
Reviewers: samsonov, earthdok
Reviewed By: earthdok
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1957
llvm-svn: 192885
Chandler Carruth