This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
The return type was specified incorrectly for proxy iterators that
define `reference` to be a class that implicitly converts to
`value_type`. `__iter_move` would end up returning an object of type
`reference` which would then implicitly convert to `value_type`; thus,
the function will return a `value_type&&` rvalue reference to the local
temporary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130197
This implements the Grapheme clustering as required by
P1868R2 width: clarifying units of width and precision in std::format
This was omitted in the initial patch, but the paper was marked as completed. This really completes the paper.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126971
The `ostream` `nullptr` inserter implemented in 3c125fe is missing a C++ version
guard. Normally, `libc++` takes the stance of backporting LWG issues to older
standards modes as was done in 3c125fe. However, backporting to older standards
modes breaks existing code in popular libraries such as `Boost.Test` and
`Google Test` who define their own overload for `nullptr_t`.
Instead, only apply this `operator<<` overload in C++17 or later.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55861.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127033
Leave the escape hatch in place with a note, but don't include the
debug mode symbols by default since we don't support the debug mode
in the normal library anymore.
This is technically an ABI break for users who were depending on
those debug mode symbols in the dylib, however those users will
already be broken at compile-time because they must have been using
_LIBCPP_DEBUG=2, which is now an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127360
In particular remove the ability to expel incomplete features from the
library at configure-time, since this can now be done through the
_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL macro.
Also, never provide symbols related to incomplete features inside the
dylib, instead provide them in c++experimental.a (this changes the
symbols list, but not for any configuration that should have shipped).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128928
This caused build failures when building Clang and libc++ together on Mac:
fatal error: 'experimental/memory_resource' file not found
See the code review for details. Reverting until the problem and how to
solve it is better understood.
(Updates to some test files were not reverted, since they seemed
unrelated and were later updated by 340b48b267b96.)
> This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
> by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
> users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
> also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
> in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
> build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
> use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
>
> Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
> existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
> that would merely break users that might be relying on such
> content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
> should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
> of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
> counterpart.
>
> Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
> _LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
> that do not implement -funstable yet.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
This reverts commit bb939931a1.
llvm-project\libcxx\test\std\time\time.hms\time.hms.members\seconds.pass.cpp(38): note: see reference to function template instantiation 'long check_seconds<std::chrono::seconds>(Duration)' being compiled
with
[
Duration=std::chrono::seconds
]
llvm-project\libcxx\test\std\time\time.hms\time.hms.members\seconds.pass.cpp(31): warning C4244: 'return': conversion from '_Rep' to 'long', possible loss of data
with
[
_Rep=__int64
]
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129928
Summary:
The patch changes the definition of __regex_word to 0x8000 for AIX because the current definition 0x80 clashes with ctype_base::print (_ISPRINT is defined as 0x80 in AIX ctype.h).
Reviewed by: Mordante, hubert.reinterpretcast, libc++
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129862
D127650 removed support for non-clang-based XL compilers, but left some
of the headers used only by this compiler and included under the
__IBMCPP__ macro. This change cleans this up by deleting these headers.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, fanbo-meng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129491
Nobody knows if there are users of libc++ with MSVC. Let's try to find that out and encourage them to upstream their changes to make that configuration work.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129055
A format string like "{}" is quite common. In this case avoid parsing
the format-spec when it's not present. Before the parsing was always
called, therefore some refactoring is done to make sure the formatters
work properly when their parse member isn't called.
From the wording it's not entirely clear whether this optimization is
allowed
[tab:formatter]
```
and the range [pc.begin(), pc.end()) from the last call to f.parse(pc).
```
Implies there's always a call to `f.parse` even when the format-spec
isn't present. Therefore this optimization isn't done for handle
classes; it's unclear whether that would break user defined formatters.
The improvements give a small reduciton is code size:
719408 12472 488 732368 b2cd0 before
718824 12472 488 731784 b2a88 after
The performance benefits when not using a format-spec are:
```
Comparing ./formatter_int.libcxx.out-baseline to ./formatter_int.libcxx.out
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_Basic<uint32_t> -0.0688 -0.0687 67 62 67 62
BM_Basic<int32_t> -0.1105 -0.1107 73 65 73 65
BM_Basic<uint64_t> -0.1053 -0.1049 95 85 95 85
BM_Basic<int64_t> -0.0889 -0.0888 93 85 93 85
BM_BasicLow<__uint128_t> -0.0655 -0.0655 96 90 96 90
BM_BasicLow<__int128_t> -0.0693 -0.0694 97 90 97 90
BM_Basic<__uint128_t> -0.0359 -0.0359 256 247 256 247
BM_Basic<__int128_t> -0.0414 -0.0414 239 229 239 229
```
For the cases where a format-spec is used the results remain similar,
some are faster some are slower, differing per run.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129426
Since the calendar classes were introduced in C++20 there's no need to
keep the old comparison operators.
This commit does the day calender class, the other calendar classes will
be in a followup commit.
Implements parts of:
- P1614R2 The mothership has landed
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128603
Change the mechanism in `iterator_operations.h` to pass around a generic
policy tag indicating whether an internal function is being invoked from
a "classic" STL algorithm or a ranges algorithm. `IterOps` is now
a template class specialized on the policy tag.
The advantage is that this mechanism is more generic and allows defining
arbitrary conditions in a clean manner.
Also add a few more iterator functions to `IterOps`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129390
This header need not be included on non-z/OS IBM platforms (and indeed
will add nothing when it is), so add a guard. This let's us remove the
header without things breaking when shipping libc++ for AIX.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, fanbo-meng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129493
Muhammad Usman Shahid