outer levels as retained rather than omitting their arguments.
This better reflects what's going on (we're performing a substitution
while still inside a template), and in theory is more correct, but I've
not found a testcase where it matters in practice (largely because we
don't allow alias templates to be declared inside a function).
Fixed AST dumping of SubstNonTypeTemplateParm[Pack]Expr to demonstrate
that we're properly substituting through dependent alias templates. (We
can't deduce properly through these yet, but we can at least produce the
right input to template argument deduction.)
No functionality change intended.
specializations and those that are done as part of rewrites.
Do not create Subst* nodes in the latter. We previously had a hybrid of
these two behaviors where we would only create some Subst* nodes but not
others during deduction guide rewrites.
No functional change intended, but the resulting ASTs are more
principled.
inner non-type pack at a different index.
We previously considered the index of the outer pack (which would refer
to an unrelated template parameter) to be deduced by deducing the inner
pack, because we inspected the (largely meaningless) type of an expanded
non-type template parameter pack.
Richard Smith