If a producer emits a nonzero segment size, `lldb` will silently read
incorrect values and crash, or do something worse later as the tuple
size is expected to be 2, rather than 3.
Neither LLVM, nor GCC produce segmented aranges, but this dangerous case
should still be checked and handled.
Reviewed by: clayborg, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75925
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
This patch switches SCCP to use ValueLatticeElement for lattice values,
instead of the local LatticeVal, as first step to enable integer range support.
This patch does not make use of constant ranges for additional operations
and the only difference for now is that integer constants are represented by
single element ranges. To preserve the existing behavior, the following helpers
are used
* isConstant(LV): returns true when LV is either a constant or a constant range with a single element. This should return true in the same cases where LV.isConstant() returned true previously.
* getConstant(LV): returns a constant if LV is either a constant or a constant range with a single element. This should return a constant in the same cases as LV.getConstant() previously.
* getConstantInt(LV): same as getConstant, but additionally casted to ConstantInt.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60582
The initialization order was not correct. These bugs were discovered by
valgrind. They appear to work fine in practice but this patch should
unblock switching the AVR backend on by default as now a standard AVR
llc invocation runs without memory errors.
The AVRISelLowering constructor would run before the subtarget boolean
fields were initialized to false. Now, the initialization order is
correct.
Summary:
This adds the ACLE intrinsic family for the VFMA and VFMS
instructions, which perform fused multiply-add on vectors of floats.
I've represented the unpredicated versions in IR using the cross-
platform `@llvm.fma` IR intrinsic. We already had isel rules to
convert one of those into a vector VFMA in the simplest possible way;
but we didn't have rules to detect a negated argument and turn it into
VFMS, or rules to detect a splat argument and turn it into one of the
two vector/scalar forms of the instruction. Now we have all of those.
The predicated form uses a target-specific intrinsic as usual, but
I've stuck to just one, for a predicated FMA. The subtraction and
splat versions are code-generated by passing an fneg or a splat as one
of its operands, the same way as the unpredicated version.
In arm_mve_defs.h, I've had to introduce a tiny extra piece of
infrastructure: a record `id` for use in codegen dags which implements
the identity function. (Just because you can't declare a Tablegen
value of type dag which is //only// a `$varname`: you have to wrap it
in something. Now I can write `(id $varname)` to get the same effect.)
Reviewers: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75998
Summary:
We were generating the declarations of polymorphic intrinsics using
`__attribute__((overloadable))`. But `overloadable` is a valid
identifier for an end user to define as a macro in a C program, and if
they do that before including `<arm_mve.h>`, then we shouldn't cause a
compile error.
Fixed to spell the attribute name `__overloadable__` instead.
Reviewers: miyuki, MarkMurrayARM, ostannard
Reviewed By: miyuki
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, dmgreen, danielkiss, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75997
Found by the LLVM MemorySanitizer tests when switching AVR to a default
backend.
ELFArch must be initialized before the call to
initializeSubtargetDependencies().
The uninitialized read would occur deep within TableGen'd code.
Summary:
This patch replaces incorrectt assert with a check. Previously it asserts that
if SCEV cannot prove `isKnownPredicate(A != B)`, then it should be able to prove
`isKnownPredicate(A == B)`.
Both these fact may be not provable. It is shown in the provided test:
Could not prove: `{-294,+,-2}<%bb1> != 0`
Asserting: `{-294,+,-2}<%bb1> == 0`
Obviously, this SCEV is not equal to zero, but 0 is in its range so we cannot
also prove that it is not zero.
Instead of assert, we should be checking the required conditions explicitly.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, fhahn, sanjoy, fedor.sergeev
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76050
Summary: The return type modification has already been implemented in rL364840 and rL365290.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF, #libc!
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70275
Summary: This patch adds the basic utilities to deal with dropable uses. dropable uses are uses that we rather drop than prevent transformations, for now they are limited to uses in llvm.assume.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: uenoku, lebedev.ri, mgorny, hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73404
Summary:
Cost modelling strikes again.
In PR44668 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44668> patch series,
i've made the same mistake of always using generic `getOperationCost()`
that i missed in reviewing D73480/D74495 which was later fixed
in 62dd44d76d.
We should be using more specific hooks instead - `getCastInstrCost()`,
`getArithmeticInstrCost()`, `getCmpSelInstrCost()`.
Evidently, this does not have an effect on the existing testcases,
with unchanged default cost budget. But if it *does* have an effect
on some target, we'll have to segregate tests that use this function
per-target, much like we already do with other TTI-aware transform tests.
There's also an issue that @samparker has brought up in post-commit-review:
>>! In D73501#1905171, @samparker wrote:
> Hi,
> Did you get performance numbers for these patches? We track the performance
> of our (Arm) open source DSP library and the cost model fixes were generally
> a notable improvement, so many thanks for that! But the final patch
> for rewriting exit values has generally been bad, especially considering
> the gains from the modelling improvements. I need to look into it further,
> but on my current test case I'm seeing +30% increase in stack accesses
> with a similar decrease in performance.
> I'm just wondering if you observed any negative effects yourself?
I don't know if this addresses that, or we need D66450 for that.
Reviewers: samparker, spatel, mkazantsev, reames, wmi
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, llvm-commits, samparker
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75908
Summary: When narrowing a scalar G_EXTRACT where the destination lines up perfectly with a single result of the emitted G_UNMERGE_VALUES a COPY should be emitted instead of unconditionally trying to emit a G_MERGE_VALUES.
Reviewers: arsenm, dsanders
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, rovka, hiraditya, volkan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75743
The note section type implies a specific format that this section does
not have thus tools like readelf fail here. Progbits has no format and
another pipeline compiler already sets the type to progbits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75913
Summary:
Currently, a BoundaryAlign fragment may be inserted after the branch
that needs to be aligned to truncate the current fragment, this fragment is
unused at most of time. To avoid that, we can insert a new empty Data
fragment instead. Non-relaxable instruction is usually emitted into Data
fragment, so the inserted empty Data fragment will be reused at a high
possibility.
Reviewers: annita.zhang, reames, MaskRay, craig.topper, LuoYuanke, jyknight
Reviewed By: reames, LuoYuanke
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dexonsmith, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75438
Summary:
This patch makes the AVR backend an official target of LLVM, serving
as a request for comments for moving the AVR backend out of
experimental.
A future patch will move the LLVM AVR buildbot (llvm-avr-linux) from the
staging buildmaster to the production buildmaster, so error emails will
start to go out.
Summary of the backend
----------------------
- 16-bit little endian
- AsmParser based assembly parser
- uses the MC library for generating AVR ELFs
- most logic driven from standard TableGen-erated tables like other
backends
- passes all of the test suite under `check-all`, including generic
CodeGen and DebugInfo tests
- Used in two frontends
- Limited, but functional support for DebugInfo and LLVM DWARF dumping
- Binary compatible with AVR-GCC and avr-{libc,libgcc} for the most part
- Cannot lower 32-bit shifts due to a bug, can lower shifts larger or
smaller
- Supports assembly/MC for all the entire AVR ISA, generally generates poorly
optimized machine instructions, with most focus thus far on correctness
I've added reviewers and subscribers from previous patches where backends were made official,
and those who participated in the recent thread on llvm-dev, please add anybody I've missed.
The most recent discussion on this topic can be found in the llvm-dev thread [Moving the AVR backend out of experimental](https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139158.html)
Reviewers: chandlerc, lattner, rengolin, tstellar, arsenm, thakis, simoll, asb
Reviewed By: rengolin, thakis
Subscribers: CryZe, wdng, mgorny, aprantl, Jim, hans, aykevl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75099
This patch is intend to implement the missing P8 MacroFusion for LLVM
according to Power8 User's Manual Section 10.1.12 Instruction Fusion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70651
https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/30112/ makes the Swift standard
library for iOS build for arm64e. If you're building Swift against your
own LLVM, this in turn requires having the builtins built for arm64e,
otherwise you won't be able to use the builtins (which will in turn lead
to an undefined symbol for `__isOSVersionAtLeast`). Make the builtins
build for arm64e to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76041
This is a reimplementation of the optimization removed in D75964. The actual spill/fill optimization is handled by D76013, this one just worries about reducing the stackmap section size itself by eliminating redundant entries. As noted in the comments, we could go a lot further here, but avoiding the degenerate invoke case as we did before is probably "enough" in practice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76021
Summary:
This patch adds a timeout of 500ms to death tests. As we add multithreaded code and locks, deadlocks become more likely so timeout will be useful.
Additionally:
- Better error handling in `invokeSubprocess`
- Makes `ProcessStatus`'s methods const
Reviewers: sivachandra, MaskRay, gchatelet, PaulkaToast
Reviewed By: sivachandra, PaulkaToast
Subscribers: tschuett, libc-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75651
Summary: This patch adds a temporary `__assert_fail` and `assert` definition to make it available to internal llvm libc code. `__assert_fail` writes to fd 2 directly instead of `stderr`, using SYS_write. I have not put it in its own linux directory because this is temporary and it should be using stdio's api in the future. It does not currently print out the line number (although we could do that by stringifying `__LINE__` if reviewers wish).
Reviewers: sivachandra, gchatelet, PaulkaToast
Reviewed By: sivachandra
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, tschuett, libc-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75420
Summary:
callbr's indirect branches aren't expected to be taken, so reduce their
probabilities to 0 while increasing the default destination to 1. This
allows some code improvements through block placement.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72656
In order for dsymutil to collect .apinotes files (which capture
attributes such as nullability, Swift import names, and availability),
I want to propose adding an apinotes: field to DIModule that gets
translated into a DW_AT_LLVM_apinotes (path) nested inside
DW_TAG_module. This will be primarily used by LLDB to indirectly
extract the Swift names of Clang declarations that were deserialized
from DWARF.
<rdar://problem/59514626>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75585
MLIR does not have a Sphinx configuration, this is just leading to build
failures at the moment.
The website https://mlir.llvm.org/ is using the Hugo generator to
process the markdown files.
Summary: Created a docker container to provide transparency and easy changes to the llvm-libc buildbot intfra.
Reviewers: sivachandra
Reviewed By: sivachandra
Subscribers: MaskRay, tschuett, libc-commits
Tags: #libc-project
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75596
Luke Drummond