We had various variants of defining dump() functions in LLVM. Normalize
them (this should just consistently implement the things discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-January/034323.html
For reference:
- Public headers should just declare the dump() method but not use
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD or #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
- The definition of a dump method should look like this:
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MyClass::dump() {
// print stuff to dbgs()...
}
#endif
llvm-svn: 293359
Specifically avoid implicit conversions from/to integral types to
avoid potential errors when changing the underlying type. For example,
a typical initialization of a "full" mask was "LaneMask = ~0u", which
would result in a value of 0x00000000FFFFFFFF if the type was extended
to uint64_t.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27454
llvm-svn: 289820
The register allocator can split a live interval of a register into a set
of smaller intervals. After the allocation of registers is complete, the
rewriter will modify the IR to replace virtual registers with the corres-
ponding physical registers. At this stage, if a register corresponding
to a subregister of a virtual register is used, the rewriter will check
if that subregister is undefined, and if so, it will add the <undef> flag
to the machine operand. The function verifying liveness of the subregis-
ter would assume that it is undefined, unless any of the subranges of the
live interval proves otherwise.
The problem is that the live intervals created during splitting do not
have any subranges, even if the original parent interval did. This could
result in the <undef> flag placed on a register that is actually defined.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21189
llvm-svn: 279625
Refactor LiveIntervals::renameDisconnectedComponents() to be a pass.
Also change the name to "RenameIndependentSubregs":
- renameDisconnectedComponents() worked on a MachineFunction at a time
so it is a natural candidate for a machine function pass.
- The algorithm is testable with a .mir test now.
- This also fixes a problem where the lazy renaming as part of the
MachineScheduler introduced IMPLICIT_DEF instructions after the number
of a nodes in a region were counted leading to a mismatch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20507
llvm-svn: 271345
We now use LiveRangeCalc::extendToUses() instead of a specially designed
algorithm in constructMainRangeFromSubranges():
- The original motivation for constructMainRangeFromSubranges() were
differences between the main liverange and subranges because of hidden
dead definitions. This case however cannot happen anymore with the
DetectDeadLaneMasks pass in place.
- It simplifies the code.
- This fixes a longstanding bug where we did not properly create new SSA
values on merging control flow (the MachineVerifier missed most of
these cases).
- Move constructMainRangeFromSubranges() to LiveIntervalAnalysis and
LiveRangeCalc to better match the implementation/available helper
functions.
This re-applies r269016. The fixes from r270290 and r270259 should avoid
the machine verifier problems this time.
llvm-svn: 270291
Fix renameDisconnectedComponents() creating vreg uses that can be
reached from function begin withouthaving a definition (or explicit
live-in). Fix this by inserting IMPLICIT_DEF instruction before
control-flow joins as necessary.
Removes an assert from MachineScheduler because we may now get
additional IMPLICIT_DEF when preparing the scheduling policy.
This fixes the underlying problem of http://llvm.org/PR27705
llvm-svn: 270259
We now use LiveRangeCalc::extendToUses() instead of a specially designed
algorithm in constructMainRangeFromSubranges():
- The original motivation for constructMainRangeFromSubranges() were
differences between the main liverange and subranges because of hidden
dead definitions. This case however cannot happen anymore with the
DetectDeadLaneMasks pass in place.
- It simplifies the code.
- This fixes a longstanding bug where we did not properly create new SSA
values on merging control flow (the MachineVerifier missed most of
these cases).
- Move constructMainRangeFromSubranges() to LiveIntervalAnalysis and
LiveRangeCalc to better match the implementation/available helper
functions.
llvm-svn: 269016
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
Take MachineInstr by reference instead of by pointer in SlotIndexes and
the SlotIndex wrappers in LiveIntervals. The MachineInstrs here are
never null, so this cleans up the API a bit. It also incidentally
removes a few implicit conversions from MachineInstrBundleIterator to
MachineInstr* (see PR26753).
At a couple of call sites it was convenient to convert to a range-based
for loop over MachineBasicBlock::instr_begin/instr_end, so I added
MachineBasicBlock::instrs.
llvm-svn: 262115
This renaming is necessary to avoid a subregister aware scheduler
accidentally creating liveness "holes" which are rejected by the
MachineVerifier.
Explanation as found in this patch:
Helper class that can divide MachineOperands of a virtual register into
equivalence classes of connected components.
MachineOperands belong to the same equivalence class when they are part of
the same SubRange segment or adjacent segments (adjacent in control
flow); Different subranges affected by the same MachineOperand belong to
the same equivalence class.
Example:
vreg0:sub0 = ...
vreg0:sub1 = ...
vreg0:sub2 = ...
...
xxx = op vreg0:sub1
vreg0:sub1 = ...
store vreg0:sub0_sub1
The example contains 3 different equivalence classes:
- One for the (dead) vreg0:sub2 definition
- One containing the first vreg0:sub1 definition and its use,
but not the second definition!
- The remaining class contains all other operands involving vreg0.
We provide a utility function here to rename disjunct classes to different
virtual registers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16126
llvm-svn: 258257
This improves ConnectedVNInfoEqClasses::Distribute() to distribute the
segments and value numbers in the subranges instead of conservatively
clearing all subregister info.
No separate test here, just clearing the subrange instead of properly
distributing them would however break my upcoming fix regarding dead super
register definitions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13075
llvm-svn: 248334
Empty subranges are not allowed in a LiveInterval and must be removed
instead: Check this in the verifiers, put a reminder for this in the
comment of the shrinkToUses variant for a single lane and make it
automatic for the shrinkToUses variant for a LiveInterval.
llvm-svn: 242431
If two livesegments from different subranges happened to have the same
definition they could possibly end up as two adjacent segments in the
main liverange with the same value number which is not allowed. Detect
such cases and fix them in the 2nd pass of computeFromMainRange() if
necessary.
No testcase as there is only an out-of-tree target where I can sensibly
come up with one.
llvm-svn: 234382
GCC 4.7's libstdc++ doesn't have std::map::emplace, but it does have
std::unordered_map::emplace, and the use case here doesn't appear to
need ordering. The container has been changed in a separate/precursor
patch, and now this patch should hopefully build cleanly even with
GCC 4.7.
& then I realized the order of the container did matter, so extra
handling of ordering was added in r231189.
Original commit message:
This makes LiveRange non-copyable, and LiveInterval is already
non-movable (due to the explicit dtor), so now it's non-copyable and
non-movable.
Fix the one case where we were relying on the (deprecated in C++11)
implicit copy ctor of LiveInterval (which happened to work because the
ctor created an object with a null segmentSet, so double-deleting the
null pointer was fine).
llvm-svn: 231192
Apparently something does care about ordering of LiveIntervals... so
revert all that stuff (r231175, r231176, r231177) & take some time to
re-evaluate.
llvm-svn: 231184
GCC 4.7's libstdc++ doesn't have std::map::emplace, but it does have
std::unordered_map::emplace, and the use case here doesn't appear to
need ordering. The container has been changed in a separate/precursor
patch, and now this patch should hopefully build cleanly even with
GCC 4.7.
Original commit message:
This makes LiveRange non-copyable, and LiveInterval is already
non-movable (due to the explicit dtor), so now it's non-copyable and
non-movable.
Fix the one case where we were relying on the (deprecated in C++11)
implicit copy ctor of LiveInterval (which happened to work because the
ctor created an object with a null segmentSet, so double-deleting the
null pointer was fine).
llvm-svn: 231176
This makes LiveRange non-copyable, and LiveInterval is already
non-movable (due to the explicit dtor), so now it's non-copyable and
non-movable.
Fix the one case where we were relying on the (deprecated in C++11)
implicit copy ctor of LiveInterval (which happened to work because the
ctor created an object with a null segmentSet, so double-deleting the
null pointer was fine).
llvm-svn: 231168
Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
llvm-svn: 231136
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
llvm-svn: 231135
by using a segment set.
The patch addresses a compile-time performance regression in the LiveIntervals
analysis pass (see http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18580). This regression
is especially critical when compiling long functions. Our analysis had shown
that the most of time is taken for generation of live intervals for physical
registers. Insertions in the middle of the array of live ranges cause quadratic
algorithmic complexity, which is apparently the main reason for the slow-down.
Overview of changes:
- The patch introduces an additional std::set<Segment>* member in LiveRange for
storing segments in the phase of initial creation. The set is used if this
member is not NULL, otherwise everything works the old way.
- The set of operations on LiveRange used during initial creation (i.e. used by
createDeadDefs and extendToUses) have been reimplemented to use the segment
set if it is available.
- After a live range is created the contents of the set are flushed to the
segment vector, because the set is not as efficient as the vector for the
later uses of the live range. After the flushing, the set is deleted and
cannot be used again.
- The set is only for live ranges computed in
LiveIntervalAnalysis::computeLiveInRegUnits() and getRegUnit() but not in
computeVirtRegs(), because I did not bring any performance benefits to
computeVirtRegs() and for some examples even brought a slow down.
Patch by Vaidas Gasiunas <vaidas.gasiunas@sap.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6013
llvm-svn: 228421
This function constructs the main liverange by merging all subranges if
subregister liveness tracking is available. This should be slightly
faster to compute instead of performing the liveness calculation again
for the main range. More importantly it avoids cases where the main
liverange would cover positions where no subrange was live. These cases
happened for partial definitions where the actual defined part was dead
and only the undefined parts used later.
The register coalescing requires that every part covered by the main
live range has at least one subrange live.
I also expect this function to become usefull later for places where the
subranges are modified in a way that it is hard to correctly fix the
main liverange in the machine scheduler, we can simply reconstruct it
from subranges then.
llvm-svn: 224806
This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.
This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...
llvm-svn: 222334
Matthias Braun