Summary:
Provide `default` and `delete` completion after the function equals.
Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82548
If an `if` statement uses braces for its `then` block, suggest braces for the `else` and `else if` completion blocks, Otherwise don't suggest them.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82626
Summary:
Currently, clangd always completes `typename` as `typename qualifier::name`, I think the current behavior is not useful when the code completion is triggered in `template <>`. So I tweak it to `typename identifier`.
Patch by @lh123 !
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82373
Summary:
Exempt ObjC from arrow/dot fixits since this has limited value for
Objective-C, where properties (referenced by dot syntax) are normally
backed by ivars (referenced by arrow syntax).
In addition, the current implementation doesn't properly mark
the fix it condition for Objective-C.
This was initially added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D41537
for C++ and then later C, don't believe the Objective-C changes
were intentional.
Reviewers: sammccall, yvvan
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81263
RecoveryExprs are modeled as dependent type to prevent bogus diagnostics
and crashes in clang.
This patch allows to preseve the type for broken calls when the
RecoveryEprs have a known type, e.g. a broken non-overloaded call, a
overloaded call when the all candidates have the same return type, so
that more features (code completion still work on "take2args(x).^") still
work.
However, adding the type is risky, which may result in more clang code being
affected leading to new crashes and hurt diagnostic, and it requires large
effort to minimize the affect (update all sites in clang to handle errorDepend
case), so we add a new flag (off by default) to allow us to develop/test
them incrementally.
This patch also has some trivial fixes to suppress diagnostics (to prevent regressions).
Tested:
all existing tests are passed (when both "-frecovery-ast", "-frecovery-ast-type" flags are flipped on);
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: rsmith, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79160
Summary:
This patch would cause clang emit more diagnostics, but it is much better than https://reviews.llvm.org/D76831
```cpp
struct A {
A(int);
~A() = delete;
};
void k() {
A a;
}
```
before the patch:
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
A a;
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
A(int);
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {
After the patch:
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
A a;
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
A(int);
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: attempt to use a deleted function
A a;
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:21:3: note: '~A' has been explicitly marked deleted here
~A() = delete;
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77395
Summary:
Clang performs expression based completion whenever it can't figure out
base of a member reference expression. It might be quite confusing in cases like
incomplete types. This patch disables that fallback.
Unfortunately `ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix` is quite tangled and this patch
adds more to it.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77570
Summary:
The basic idea is to walk through the concept definition, looking for
t.foo() where t has the constrained type.
In this patch:
- nested types are recognized and offered after ::
- variable/function members are recognized and offered after the correct
dot/arrow/colon trigger
- member functions are recognized (anything directly called). parameter
types are presumed to be the argument types. parameters are unnamed.
- result types are available when a requirement has a type constraint.
These are printed as constraints, except same_as<T> which prints as T.
Not in this patch:
- support for merging/overloading when two locations describe the same member.
The last one wins, for any given name. This is probably important...
- support for nested template members (T::x<int>)
- support for completing members of (instantiations of) template template parameters
Reviewers: nridge, saar.raz
Subscribers: mgrang, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73649
Summary:
Previously any symlinks would be ignored since the directory
traversal doesn't follow them.
With this change we now follow symlinks (via a `stat` call
in order to figure out the target type of the symlink if it
is valid).
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74790
Summary:
CodeCompletion was not being triggered after successfully parsed
initializer lists, e.g.
```cpp
void foo(int, bool);
void bar() {
foo({1}^, false);
}
```
CodeCompletion would suggest the function foo as an overload candidate up until
the point marked with `^` but after that point we do not trigger signature help
since parsing succeeds.
This patch handles that case by failing in parsing expression lists whenever we
see a codecompletion token, in addition to getting an invalid subexpression.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73177
Summary:
Printing policy was not propogated to functiondecls when creating a
completion string which resulted in canonical template parameters like
`foo<type-parameter-0-0>`. This patch propogates printing policy to those as
well.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/76
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72715
The original bug report can be found
[here](https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/85)
Given the following code:
```c++
void function() {
auto Lambda = [](int a, double &b) {return 1.f;};
La^
}
```
Triggering the completion at `^` would show `(lambda)` before this patch
and would show signature `(int a, double &b) const`, build a snippet etc
with this patch.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed by: sammccall
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70445
Summary:
This is shorter, shouldn't be confusing (is consistent with how they're declared),
and avoids messy cases that are printed as myclass<type-param-0-0>(int) in the
case of partial specialization.
Fixes part of https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/76
Reviewers: hokein, lh123
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70307
Summary:
This fixes a regression that led to size() not being available in clangd
when completing 'deque().^' and using libc++.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68335
llvm-svn: 373710
Summary:
- when a method is not available because of the target value kind (e.g. an &&
method on a Foo& variable), then don't offer it.
- when a method is effectively shadowed by another method from the same class
with a) an identical argument list and b) superior qualifiers, then don't
offer it.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62582
llvm-svn: 362785
Summary:
To allow filtering on any of the words in the editors.
In particular, the following completions were changed:
- 'using namespace <#name#>'
Typed text before: 'using', after: 'using namespace'.
- 'else if (#<condition#>)'
Before: 'else', after: 'else if'.
- 'using typename <#qualifier#>::<#name#>'
Before: 'using', after: 'using typename'.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62615
llvm-svn: 362479
Summary:
E.g. we now turn `while(<#cond#>){` into `while (<#cond#>) {`
This slightly improves the final output. Should not affect clients that
format the result on their own.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62616
llvm-svn: 362363
Summary:
Completion can return multi-line patterns in some cases, e.g.
for (<#init#>; <#cond#>; <#inc#>) {
<#body#>
}
However, most patterns break the line only before closing brace,
resulting in code like:
namespace <#name#> { <#decls#>
}
While some (e.g. the 'for' example above) are breaking lines after the
opening brace too.
This change ensures all patterns consistently break after the opening
brace, this leads to nicer UX when using those in an actual editor.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62405
llvm-svn: 361829
Summary:
We put only part of the signature starting with a function name into "typed text"
chunks now, previously the whole signature was "typed text".
This leads to meaningful fuzzy match scores, giving better signals to
compare with other completion items.
Ideally, we would not display the result type to the user, but that requires adding
a new kind of completion chunk.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62298
llvm-svn: 361623
Summary:
Where semicolon is required in any case. Here's a list of completions
that now have a semicolon:
- namespace <name> = <target>;
- using namespace <name>;
- using <qualifier>::<name>;
- continue;
- break;
- goto <label>;
- return;
- return <expression>;
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61589
llvm-svn: 360042
Frameworks filesystem representations:
UIKit.framework/Headers/%header%
Framework import format:
#import <UIKit/%header%>
Thus the completion code must map the input format of <UIKit/> to
the path of UIKit.framework/Headers as well as strip the
".framework" suffix when auto-completing the framework name.
llvm-svn: 355008
When Clang/LLVM is built with the CLANG_DEFAULT_STD_CXX CMake macro that sets
the default standard to something other than C++14, there are a number of lit
tests that fail as they rely on the C++14 default.
This patch just adds the language standard option explicitly to such test cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57581
llvm-svn: 353163
Rather than sprinkle calls to DiagnoseUnusedExprResult() around in places where we want diagnostics, we now diagnose unused expression statements and full expressions in a more generic way when acting on the final expression statement. This results in more appropriate diagnostics for [[nodiscard]] where we were previously lacking them, such as when the body of a for loop is not a compound statement.
This patch fixes PR39837.
llvm-svn: 350404
Summary:
The clang used to pick up the qualifiers of the lamba's call operator
(which is always const) and fail to show non-const methods of 'this' in
completion results.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55885
llvm-svn: 349655
Summary:
...that fires when running completion inside an argument of
UnresolvedMemberExpr (see the added test).
The assertion that fires is from Sema::TryObjectArgumentInitialization:
assert(FromClassification.isLValue());
This happens because Sema::AddFunctionCandidates does not account for
object types which are pointers. It ends up classifying them incorrectly.
All usages of the function outside code completion are used to run
overload resolution for operators. In those cases the object type being
passed is always a non-pointer type, so it's not surprising the function
did not expect a pointer in the object argument.
However, code completion reuses the same function and calls it with the
object argument coming from UnresolvedMemberExpr, which can be a pointer
if the member expr is an arrow ('->') access.
Extending AddFunctionCandidates to allow pointer object types does not
seem too crazy since all the functions down the call chain can properly
handle pointer object types if we properly classify the object argument
as an l-value, i.e. the classification of the implicitly dereferenced
pointer.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55331
llvm-svn: 348590
Summary:
Similar to auto-completion for ObjC methods, inherited properties
should be penalized / direct class and category properties should
be prioritized.
Note that currently, the penalty for using a result from a base class
(CCD_InBaseClass) is equal to the penalty for using a method as a
property (CCD_MethodAsProperty).
Reviewers: jkorous, sammccall, akyrtzi, arphaman, benlangmuir
Reviewed By: sammccall, akyrtzi
Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53900
llvm-svn: 347352
Summary:
Removes references to initialized variable from the following completions:
int x = ^;
Handles only the trivial cases where the variable name is completed
immediately at the start of initializer or assignment, more complicated
cases aren't covered, e.g. these completions still contain 'x':
// More complicated expressions.
int x = foo(^);
int x = 10 + ^;
// Other kinds of initialization.
int x{^};
int x(^);
// Constructor initializers.
struct Foo {
Foo() : x(^) {}
int x;
};
We should address those in the future, but they are outside of the scope of
this initial change.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54156
llvm-svn: 346301
Summary:
Instead of providing generic "args" for member and base class
initializers, tries to fetch relevant constructors and show their signatures.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ZaMaZaN4iK, eraman, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53654
llvm-svn: 345844
Summary:
No new tests as the existing tests for result priority should give us
coverage. Also as the new flag is trivial enough, I'm reluctant to plumb the
flag to c-index-test output.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53635
llvm-svn: 345135
Summary:
In a decl like `int AA(BB cc)` where BB isn't defined, we end up trying to
parse `BB cc` as an expression (vexing parse) and end up triggering the
parser's "recovery-in-function" completion with no actual function
scope.
This patch avoids the assumption that such a scope exists in this context.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53070
llvm-svn: 344133
lh123