Building on the previous change, this generalizes
ScalarEvolution::getRangeViaFactoring to work with
{Ext(C?A:B)+k0,+,Ext(C?A:B)+k1} where Ext can be a zero extend, sign
extend or truncate operation, and k0 and k1 are constants.
llvm-svn: 262979
This change generalizes ScalarEvolution::getRangeViaFactoring to work
with {Ext(C?A:B),+,Ext(C?A:B)} where Ext can be a zero extend, sign
extend or truncate operation.
llvm-svn: 262978
This is intended to provide a parallel (threaded) ThinLTO scheme
for linker plugin use through the libLTO C API.
The intent of this patch is to provide a first implementation as a
proof-of-concept and allows linker to start supporting ThinLTO by
definiing the libLTO C API. Some part of the libLTO API are left
unimplemented yet. Following patches will add support for these.
The current implementation can link all clang/llvm binaries.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17066
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 262977
The fix consisting in using the library call for atomic compare and swap when
the instruction is not safe to use may be incorrect. Indeed the library call may
not exist on all platform. In other words, we need a better fix!
llvm-svn: 262943
TSan instrumentation functions for atomic stores, loads, and cmpxchg work on
integer value types. This patch adds casts before calling TSan instrumentation
functions in cases where the value is a pointer.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17833
llvm-svn: 262876
I noticed this test as part of:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11393
...which is confusing enough as-is.
Let's show the exact codegen, so the changes will be more obvious.
llvm-svn: 262874
Summary:
This testcase had me confused. It made me believe that you can use
alias scopes and alias scopes list interchangeably with alias.scope and
noalias. Both langref and the other testcase use scope lists so I went
looking.
Turns out using scope directly only happens to work by chance. When
ScopedNoAliasAAResult::mayAliasInScopes traverses this as a scope list:
!1 = !{!1, !0, !"some scope"}
, the first entry is in fact a scope but only because the scope is
happened to be defined self-referentially to make it unique globally.
The remaining elements in the tuple (!0, !"some scope") are considered
as scopes but AliasScopeNode::getDomain will just bail on those without
any error.
This change avoids this ambiguity in the test but I've also been
wondering if we should issue some sort of a diagnostics.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, hfinkel
Subscribers: mssimpso, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16670
llvm-svn: 262841
This code has been successfully used to bootstrap libc++ in a no-asserts
mode for a very long time, so the code that follows cannot be completely
incorrect. I've added a test that shows the current behavior for this
kind of code with DFSan. If it is desirable for DFSan to do something
special when processing an invoke of a variadic function, it can be
added, but we shouldn't keep an assert that we've been ignoring due to
release builds anyways.
llvm-svn: 262829
Patch to add support for target shuffle combining of X86ISD::VPERMV3 nodes, including support for detecting unary shuffles.
This uncovered several issues with the X86ISD::VPERMV3 shuffle mask decoding of non-64 bit shuffle mask elements - the bit masking wasn't being correctly computed.
Removed non-constant pool mask decode path as we have no way of testing it right now.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17916
llvm-svn: 262809
Added support for decoding VPERMILPS variable shuffle masks that aren't in the constant pool.
Added target shuffle mask decoding for SCALAR_TO_VECTOR+VZEXT_MOVL cases - these can happen for v2i64 constant re-materialization
Followup to D17681
llvm-svn: 262784
Rematerializing and merging into a bigger register class at the same
time, requires the subregister range lanemasks getting remapped to the
new register class.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR26805
llvm-svn: 262768
When the lowering of the setjmp intrinsic requires
a global base pointer to be set, make sure such pointer
gets defined by the CGBR pass.
This fixes PR26742.
llvm-svn: 262762
cmpxchgXXb uses RBX as one of its implicit argument. I.e., when
we use that instruction we need to clobber RBX. This is generally
fine, expect when RBX is a reserved register because in that case,
the register allocator will not track its value and will not
save and restore it when interferences occur.
rdar://problem/24851412
llvm-svn: 262759
The x86 ret instruction has a 16 bit immediate indicating how many bytes
to pop off of the stack beyond the return address.
There is a problem when extremely large structs are passed by value: we
might not be able to fit the number of bytes to pop into the return
instruction.
To fix this, expand RET_FLAG a little later and use a special sequence
to clean the stack:
pop %ecx ; return address is now in %ecx
add $n, %esp ; clean the stack
push %ecx ; bring the return address back on the stack
ret ; pop the return address and jmp to it's value
llvm-svn: 262755
The diff is relatively large since I took a chance to rearrange the code I had to touch in a more obvious way, but the key bit is merely using the !range metadata when we can't analyze the instruction further. The previous !range metadata code was essentially just dead since no binary operator or cast will have !range metadata (per Verifier) and it was otherwise dropped on the floor.
llvm-svn: 262751
The divrem combine assumed the type of the div/rem is simple, which isn't
necessarily true. This probably worked fine until r250825, since it only
saw legal types, but now breaks when it runs as a pre-type-legalization
combine.
This fixes PR26835.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17878
llvm-svn: 262746
The thinlto_linkonceresolution.ll gold linker test introduced in r262727
included a target triple, but didn't set the emulation mode, which is
necessary since the default linker target may be different.
Patch by H.J. Lu
llvm-svn: 262745
When div+rem calls on the same arguments are found, the ARM back-end merges the
two calls into one __aeabi_divmod call for up to 32-bits values. However,
for 64-bit values, which also have a lib call (__aeabi_ldivmod), it wasn't
merging the calls, and thus calling ldivmod twice and spilling the temporary
results, which generated pretty bad code.
This patch legalises 64-bit lib calls for divmod, so that now all the spilling
and the second call are gone. It also relaxes the DivRem combiner a bit on the
legal type check, since it was already checking for isLegalOrCustom on every
value, so the extra check for isTypeLegal was redundant.
Second attempt, creating TLI.isOperationCustom like isOperationExpand, to make
sure we only emit valid types or the ones that were explicitly marked as custom.
Now, passing check-all and test-suite on x86, ARM and AArch64.
This patch fixes PR17193 (and a long time FIXME in the tests).
llvm-svn: 262738
Summary:
This is necessary for when we run out of VGPRs and can no
longer use v_{read,write}_lane for spilling SGPRs.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17592
llvm-svn: 262732
Summary:
Since IR files are all compiled into separate independent object files
in ThinLTO mode, the prevailing linkonce symbols must be emitted in its
object file even if it is no longer referenced there, e.g. if no
references remain in the module after inlining, since it may be
referenced by another ThinLTO compiled object file. This is done by
changing LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY* symbols to LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF,
which converts the prevailing linkonce to weak. We also don't need the
other prevailing IRONLY handling for internalization, which is not
currently performed for ThinLTO.
Test case included.
Reviewers: davidxl, rafael
Subscribers: rafael, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16173
llvm-svn: 262727
Summary:
Launch ThinLTO backends (LTO and codegen pipelines with importing) in
parallel using a ThreadPool, after creating the combined index.
The number of threads is controlled by the existing -jobs gold plugin
option, or the hardware concurrency if not specified.
The old behavior of exiting after creating the combined index can be
invoked via a new thinlto-index-only plugin option.
This commit involves just the ThinLTO-specific pieces of D15390, the NFC
and other restructuring pieces were committed independently:
r262677: Add hardware_concurrency interface to llvm::thread (NFC)
r262719: Change split code gen to use ThreadPool
r262721: Refactor gold-plugin codegen to prepare for ThinLTO threads (NFC)
Reviewers: pcc, joker.eph, rafael
Subscribers: rafael, davidxl, llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15390
llvm-svn: 262724
These correspond to IMAGE_ATOMIC_* and are going to be used by Mesa for the
GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
Initial change by Nicolai H.hnle
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17401
llvm-svn: 262701
This experiment was originally about trying to use facts implied dominating conditions to infer more precise known bits. While the compile time was found to be acceptable on several large code bases, we never found sufficiently profitable examples to justify turning on the code by default. Given this, it's time to abandon the experiment.
Several folks have commented that they've found this useful for experimentation, but nothing has come of those experiments. Given how easy the patch is to apply, there's no reason to leave the code in tree.
For anyone interested in further investigation in this area, I recommend finding the summary email I sent on one of the original review threads. In particular, I now believe the use-list based approach is strictly worse than the dom-tree-walking approach.
llvm-svn: 262646
Given that we're not actually reducing the instruction count in the included
regression tests, I think we would call this a canonicalization step.
The motivation comes from the example in PR26702:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
If we hoist the bitwise logic ahead of the bitcast, the previously unoptimizable
example of:
define <4 x i32> @is_negative(<4 x i32> %x) {
%lobit = ashr <4 x i32> %x, <i32 31, i32 31, i32 31, i32 31>
%not = xor <4 x i32> %lobit, <i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1>
%bc = bitcast <4 x i32> %not to <2 x i64>
%notnot = xor <2 x i64> %bc, <i64 -1, i64 -1>
%bc2 = bitcast <2 x i64> %notnot to <4 x i32>
ret <4 x i32> %bc2
}
Simplifies to the expected:
define <4 x i32> @is_negative(<4 x i32> %x) {
%lobit = ashr <4 x i32> %x, <i32 31, i32 31, i32 31, i32 31>
ret <4 x i32> %lobit
}
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17583
llvm-svn: 262645
After r262438 we can have provably positive NSW SCEV expressions whose
zero extensions cannot be simplified (since r262438 makes SCEV better at
computing constant ranges). This means demoting sexts of positive add
recurrences eagerly can result in an unsimplified zero extension where
we could have had a simplified sign extension. This change fixes the
issue by teaching SCEV to demote sext of a positive SCEV expression to a
zext only if the sext could not be simplified.
llvm-svn: 262638
This patch provides the following infrastructure for PGO enhancements in inliner:
Enable the use of block level profile information in inliner
Incremental update of block frequency information during inlining
Update the function entry counts of callees when they get inlined into callers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16381
llvm-svn: 262636
The variable mask form of VPERMILPD/VPERMILPS were only partially implemented, with much of it still performed as an intrinsic.
This patch properly defines the instructions in terms of X86ISD::VPERMILPV, permitting the opcode to be easily combined as a target shuffle.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17681
llvm-svn: 262635
That's not the case for VPERMV/VPERMV3, which cover all possible
combinations (the C intrinsics use a different order; the AVX vs
AVX512 intrinsics are different still).
Since:
r246981 AVX-512: Lowering for 512-bit vector shuffles.
VPERMV is recognized in getTargetShuffleMask.
This breaks assumptions in most callers, as they expect
the non-mask operands to start at index 0.
VPERMV has the mask as operand #0; VPERMV3 has it in the middle.
Instead of the faulty assumption, have getTargetShuffleMask return
its operands as well.
One alternative we considered was to change the operand order of
VPERMV, but we agreed to stick to the instruction order, as there
are more AVX512 weirdness to cover (vpermt2/vpermi2 in particular).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17041
llvm-svn: 262627
The vectorization of first-order recurrences (r261346) caused PR26734. When
detecting these recurrences, we need to ensure that the previous value is
actually defined inside the loop. This patch includes the fix and test case.
llvm-svn: 262624
This test failed in some ARM bots after a divmod change because it was
running on a native llc, instead of targeted one. This makes sure the test
is target-specific (as intended), and also copies to ARM and AArch64
directories. If it is also supposed to work on other architectures, I'll
leave as an exercise to the respective maintainers.
llvm-svn: 262620
Summary: Adds the 'avr_intrcc' and 'avr_signalcc' IR calling convention tokens to the parser.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: dylanmckay, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16348
llvm-svn: 262600
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 262599
The code was previously not able to track a boolean argument
at a call site back to the formal argument of the caller.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17786
llvm-svn: 262575
If we have a loop with a rarely taken path, we will prune that from the blocks which get added as part of the loop chain. The problem is that we weren't then recognizing the loop chain as schedulable when considering the preheader when forming the function chain. We'd then fall to various non-predecessors before finally scheduling the loop chain (as if the CFG was unnatural.) The net result was that there could be lots of garbage between a loop preheader and the loop, even though we could have directly fallen into the loop. It also meant we separated hot code with regions of colder code.
The particular reason for the rejection of the loop chain was that we were scanning predecessor of the header, seeing the backedge, believing that was a globally more important predecessor (true), but forgetting to account for the fact the backedge precessor was already part of the existing loop chain (oops!.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17830
llvm-svn: 262547
Catch objects with a displacement of zero do not initialize a catch
object. The displacement is relative to %rsp at the end of the
function's prologue for x86_64 targets.
If we place an object at the top-of-stack, we will end up wit a
displacement of zero resulting in our catch object remaining
uninitialized.
Address this by creating our catch objects as fixed objects. We will
ensure that the UnwindHelp object is created after the catch objects so
that no catch object will have a displacement of zero.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17823
llvm-svn: 262546
Summary: This is the last step toward supporting aggregate memory access in instcombine. This explodes stores of arrays into a serie of stores for each element, allowing them to be optimized.
Reviewers: joker.eph, reames, hfinkel, majnemer, mgrang
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17828
llvm-svn: 262530
Summary: This is another step toward improving fca support. This unpack load of array in a series of load to array's elements.
Reviewers: chandlerc, joker.eph, majnemer, reames, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15890
llvm-svn: 262521
This is a test that Akira Hatanaka wrote to test GlobalOpt's handling of
aliases with GEP operands. David Majnemer independently made the same
change to GlobalOpt in r212079. Akira's test is a useful addition, so I'm
pulling it over from the llvm repo for Swift on GitHub.
llvm-svn: 262510
When div+rem calls on the same arguments are found, the ARM back-end merges the
two calls into one __aeabi_divmod call for up to 32-bits values. However,
for 64-bit values, which also have a lib call (__aeabi_ldivmod), it wasn't
merging the calls, and thus calling ldivmod twice and spilling the temporary
results, which generated pretty bad code.
This patch legalises 64-bit lib calls for divmod, so that now all the spilling
and the second call are gone. It also relaxes the DivRem combiner a bit on the
legal type check, since it was already checking for isLegalOrCustom on every
value, so the extra check for isTypeLegal was redundant.
This patch fixes PR17193 (and a long time FIXME in the tests).
llvm-svn: 262507
This reverts commit r262370.
It turns out there is code out there that does sequences of allocas
greater than 4K: http://crbug.com/591404
The goal of this change was to improve the code size of inalloca call
sequences, but we got tangled up in the mess of dynamic allocas.
Instead, we should come back later with a separate MI pass that uses
dominance to optimize the full sequence. This should also be able to
remove the often unneeded stacksave/stackrestore pairs around the call.
llvm-svn: 262505
Most of the time ARM has the CCR.UNALIGN_TRP bit set to false which
means that unaligned loads/stores do not trap and even extensive testing
will not catch these bugs. However the multi/double variants are not
affected by this bit and will still trap. In effect a more aggressive
load/store optimization will break existing (bad) code.
These bugs do not necessarily manifest in the broken code where the
misaligned pointer is formed but often later in perfectly legal code
where it is accessed. This means recompiling system libraries (which
have no alignment bugs) with a newer compiler will break existing
applications (with alignment bugs) that worked before.
So (under protest) I implemented this safe mode which limits the
formation of multi/double operations to cases that are not affected by
user code (stack operations like spills/reloads) or cases where the
normal operations trap anyway (floating point load/stores). It is
disabled by default.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17015
llvm-svn: 262504
Summary:
This change enables frame pointer elimination in non-leaf functions.
The -fomit-frame-pointer option still needs to be used when compiling
via clang (or an equivalent method of not setting the
'no-frame-pointer-elim*' function attributes if generating llvm IR via
some other method) to take advantage of this optimization.
This change should be NFC when compiling via clang without
-fomit-frame-pointer.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, qcolombet, llvm-commits, danalbert, mcrosier, srhines
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17730
llvm-svn: 262495
We have a number of useful lowering strategies for VBROADCAST instructions (both from memory and register element 0) which the 128-bit form of the MOVDDUP instruction can make use of.
This patch tweaks lowerVectorShuffleAsBroadcast to enable it to broadcast 2f64 args using MOVDDUP as well.
It does require a slight tweak to the lowerVectorShuffleAsBroadcast mechanism as the existing MOVDDUP lowering uses isShuffleEquivalent which can match binary shuffles that can lower to (unary) broadcasts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17680
llvm-svn: 262478
We modeled the RDFLAGS{32,64} operations as "using" {E,R}FLAGS.
While technically correct, this is not be desirable for folks who want
to examine aspects of the FLAGS register which are not related to
computation like whether or not CPUID is a valid instruction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17782
llvm-svn: 262465
Have ScalarEvolution::getRange re-consider cases like "{C?A:B,+,C?P:Q}"
by factoring out "C" and computing RangeOf{A,+,P} union RangeOf({B,+,Q})
instead.
The latter can be easier to compute precisely in cases like
"{C?0:N,+,C?1:-1}" N is the backedge taken count of the loop; since in
such cases the latter form simplifies to [0,N+1) union [0,N+1).
llvm-svn: 262438
As noted in the code comment, I don't think we can do the same transform that we do for
*scalar* integers comparisons to *vector* integers comparisons because it might pessimize
the general case.
Exhibit A for an incomplete integer comparison ISA remains x86 SSE/AVX: it only has EQ and GT
for integer vectors.
But we should now recognize all the variants of this construct and produce the optimal code
for the cases shown in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26701
llvm-svn: 262424
Summary: SampleProfile pass needs to be performed after InstructionCombiningPass, which helps eliminate un-inlinable function calls.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17742
llvm-svn: 262419
On AMDGPU where operations i64 operations are often bitcasted to v2i32
and back, this pattern shows up regularly where it breaks some
expected combines on i64, such as load width reducing.
This fixes some test failures in a future commit when i64 loads
are changed to promote.
llvm-svn: 262397
Revert r262248 in an attempt to fix the clang-native-aarch64-full
bot and to investigate a performance regression in
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench
llvm-svn: 262388
Sanjoy Das