SGPR_128 only includes the real allocatable SGPRs, and SReg_128 adds
the additional non-allocatable TTMP registers. There's no point in
allocating SReg_128 vregs. This shrinks the size of the classes
regalloc needs to consider, which is usually good.
llvm-svn: 374284
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
This updates the MIRPrinter to include the regclass when printing
virtual register defs, which is already valid syntax for the
parser. That is, given 64 bit %0 and %1 in a "gpr" regbank,
%1(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
would now be written as
%1:gpr(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
While this change alone introduces a bit of redundancy with the
registers block, it allows us to update the tests to be more concise
and understandable and brings us closer to being able to remove the
registers block completely.
Note: We generally only print the class in defs, but there is one
exception. If there are uses without any defs whatsoever, we'll print
the class on all uses. I'm not completely convinced this comes up in
meaningful machine IR, but for now the MIRParser and MachineVerifier
both accept that kind of stuff, so we don't want to have a situation
where we can print something we can't parse.
llvm-svn: 316479
Summary:
During remat, some subranges might end up having invalid segments which caused problems for later
coalescing.
Added in a check to remove segments that are invalidated as part of the remat.
See http://llvm.org/PR33524
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34391
llvm-svn: 307247
Matt Arsenault