Summary:
The optimization to early break out of loops if all threads are dead was
never fully implemented.
But the PHI node analyzing is actually causing a number of problems, so
remove all the extra code for it.
(This does actually regress code quality in a few places because it
ends up relying more heavily on phi's of i1, which we don't do a
great job with. However, since it fixes real bugs in the wild, we
should take this change. I have some prototype changes to improve
i1 lowering in general -- not just for control flow -- which should
help recover the code quality, I just need to make those changes
fit for general consumption. -- Nicolai)
Change-Id: I6fc6c6c8961857ac6009fcfb9f7e5e48dc23fbb1
Patch-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, tpr
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53359
llvm-svn: 345718
Summary:
Two utils methods have essentially the same functionality. This is an attempt to merge them into one.
1. lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp : MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred
2. lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp : MergeBlockIntoPredecessor
Prior to the patch:
1. MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred
Updates either DomTree or DeferredDominance
Moves all instructions from Pred to BB, deletes Pred
Asserts BB has single predecessor
If address was taken, replace the block address with constant 1 (?)
2. MergeBlockIntoPredecessor
Updates DomTree, LoopInfo and MemoryDependenceResults
Moves all instruction from BB to Pred, deletes BB
Returns if doesn't have a single predecessor
Returns if BB's address was taken
After the patch:
Method 2. MergeBlockIntoPredecessor is attempting to become the new default:
Updates DomTree or DeferredDominance, and LoopInfo and MemoryDependenceResults
Moves all instruction from BB to Pred, deletes BB
Returns if doesn't have a single predecessor
Returns if BB's address was taken
Uses of MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred that need to be replaced:
1. lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopSimplifyCFG.cpp
Updated in this patch. No challenges.
2. lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
Updated in this patch.
i. eliminateFallThrough is straightforward, but I added using a temporary array to avoid the iterator invalidation.
ii. eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(s) methods also now use a temporary array for blocks
Some interesting aspects:
- Since Pred is not deleted (BB is), the entry block does not need updating.
- The entry block was being updated with the deleted block in eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock. Added assert to make obvious that BB=SinglePred.
- isMergingEmptyBlockProfitable assumes BB is the one to be deleted.
- eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BB) does not delete BB on one path, it deletes its unique predecessor instead.
- adding some test owner as subscribers for the interesting tests modified:
test/CodeGen/X86/avx-cmp.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/nested-loop-conditions.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/si-annotate-cf.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/hoist-spill.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2006-11-17-IllegalMove.ll
3. lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
Not covered in this patch. It is the only use case using the DeferredDominance.
I would defer to Brian Rzycki to make this replacement.
Reviewers: chandlerc, spatel, davide, brzycki, bkramer, javed.absar
Subscribers: qcolombet, sanjoy, nemanjai, nhaehnle, jlebar, tpr, kbarton, RKSimon, wmi, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48202
llvm-svn: 335183
Summary:
StructurizeCFG::orderNodes basically uses a reverse post-order (RPO) traversal of the region list to get the order.
The only problem with it is that sometimes backedges for outer loops will be visited before backedges for inner loops.
To solve this problem, a loop depth based approach has been used to make sure all blocks in this loop has been visited
before moving on to outer loop.
However, we found a problem for a SubRegion which is a loop itself:
--> BB1 --> BB2 --> BB3 -->
In this case, BB2 is a SubRegion (loop), and thus its loopdepth is different than that of BB1 and BB3. This fact will lead
BB2 to be placed in the wrong order.
In this work, we treat the SubRegion as a special case and use its exit block to determine the loop and its depth
to guard the sorting.
Reviewers:
arsenm, jlebar
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46912
llvm-svn: 333111
Summary:
The current StructurizeCFG pass only works for CFG with one exit. AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes combines multiple "return" blocks and/or "unreachable" blocks
to one exit block for the Structurizer to work. However, infinite loop is another kind of special "exit", and if we don't handle it, the case of multiple exits will prevent the structurizer from working.
In this work, for each infinite loop, we add a dummy edge to the "return" block, and thus the AMDGPUUnifyDivergentExitNodes pass will work with infinite loops.
This will make CFG with infinite loops be structurized.
Reviewer:
nhaehnle
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46340
llvm-svn: 332625
It causes regressions in various OpenGL test suites.
Keep the test cases introduced by r321751 as XFAIL, and add a test case
for the regression.
Change-Id: I90b4cc354f68cebe5fcef1f2422dc8fe1c6d3514
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36015
llvm-svn: 323355
Summary:
I had a case where multiple nested uniform ifs resulted in code that did
v_cmp comparisons, combining the results with s_and_b64, s_or_b64 and
s_xor_b64 and using the resulting mask in s_cbranch_vccnz, without first
ensuring that bits for inactive lanes were clear.
There was already code for inserting an "s_and_b64 vcc, exec, vcc" to
clear bits for inactive lanes in the case that the branch is instruction
selected as s_cbranch_scc1 and is then changed to s_cbranch_vccnz in
SIFixSGPRCopies. I have added the same code into SILowerControlFlow for
the case that the branch is instruction selected as s_cbranch_vccnz.
This de-optimizes the code in some cases where the s_and is not needed,
because vcc is the result of a v_cmp, or multiple v_cmp instructions
combined by s_and/s_or. We should add a pass to re-optimize those cases.
Reviewers: arsenm, kzhuravl
Subscribers: wdng, yaxunl, t-tye, llvm-commits, dstuttard, timcorringham, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41292
llvm-svn: 322119
The work order was changed in r228186 from SCC order
to RPO with an arbitrary sorting function. The sorting
function attempted to move inner loop nodes earlier. This
was was apparently relying on an assumption that every block
in a given loop / the same loop depth would be seen before
visiting another loop. In the broken testcase, a block
outside of the loop was encountered before moving onto
another block in the same loop. The testcase would then
structurize such that one blocks unconditional successor
could never be reached.
Revert to plain RPO for the analysis phase. This fixes
detecting edges as backedges that aren't really.
The processing phase does use another visited set, and
I'm unclear on whether the order there is as important.
An arbitrary order doesn't work, and triggers some infinite
loops. The reversed RPO list seems to work and is closer
to the order that was used before, minus the arbitary
custom sorting.
A few of the changed tests now produce smaller code,
and a few are slightly worse looking.
llvm-svn: 321751
This reverts commit r300732. This breaks a few tests.
I think the problem is related to adding more uses of
the condition that don't yet exist at this point.
llvm-svn: 301242
The most common case for a branch condition is
a single use compare. Directly invert the branch
predicate rather than adding a lot of xor i1 true
which the DAG will have to fold later.
This produces nicer to read structurizer output.
This produces some random changes in codegen
due to the DAG swapping branch conditions itself,
and then does a poor job of dealing with those
inverts.
llvm-svn: 300732
If the branch condition for a loop was a phi which itself
was fed from a phi from a loop, it isn't safe to try
to delete the phi until after the loop is handled.
llvm-svn: 298737
Stanislav Mekhanoshin