Summary:
This looks like a useful user-facing configuration parameter,
which should be discoverable.
Also fix a small typo in the description.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57384
llvm-svn: 352509
References between associated comdats are invalid per COFF spec, but the newest
Windows SDK contains obj files that have these references
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=925943#c13). So add back
support for them and add tests for them. The old code handled them fine.
This makes lld-link match the behavior of newer link.exe versions as far as I
can tell. (The behavior before this change matched the behavior of older
link.exe versions.)
This mostly reverts r352254.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57387
llvm-svn: 352508
The two records aren't used by anything yet, but this part can be
separated out easily, so I am comitting it separately to simplify
reviews of the followup patch.
llvm-svn: 352507
Summary:
--set-section-flags is used to change the section flags (e.g. SHF_ALLOC) for given sections. The flags allowed are the same from the existing --rename-section=.old=.new[,flags] feature.
Additionally, make sure that --set-section-flag cannot be used with --rename-section (either the source or destination), since --rename-section accepts flags. This avoids ambiguity for something like "--rename-section=.foo=.bar,alloc --set-section-flag=.bar,code".
Reviewers: jhenderson, jakehehrlich, alexshap, espindola
Reviewed By: jhenderson, jakehehrlich
Subscribers: llvm-commits, emaste, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57198
llvm-svn: 352505
This should have been part of r352494, which added the corresponding
function. The unit test ended up as a separate commit accidentally.
llvm-svn: 352501
I found a really strange WWM issue through a very convoluted shader that
essentially boils down to a bug in SIInstrInfo where canReadVGPR did not
correctly identify that WWM is like a copy and can have a VGPR as its
source.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56002
llvm-svn: 352500
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two stages:
- Stage 1. Decides whether the action is available to the user and
collects all the information required to finish the action.
Should be cheap, since this will run over all the actions known to
clangd on each textDocument/codeAction request from the client.
- Stage 2. Uses information from stage 1 to produce the actual edits
that the code action should perform. This stage can be expensive and
will only run if the user chooses to perform the specified action in
the UI.
One unfortunate consequence of this change is increased latency of
processing the textDocument/codeAction requests, which now wait for an
AST. However, we cannot avoid this with what we have available in the LSP
today.
Reviewers: kadircet, ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56267
llvm-svn: 352494
They were breaking the Windows build when using MSBuild, see the
discussion on D56781.
r351833: "Use response file when generating LLVM-C.dll"
> Use response file when generating LLVM-C.dll
>
> As discovered in D56774 the command line gets to long, so use a response file to give the script the libs. This change has been tested and is confirmed working for me.
>
> Commited on behalf of Jakob Bornecrantz
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56781
r352250: "Build LLVM-C.dll by default on windows and enable in release package"
> Build LLVM-C.dll by default on windows and enable in release package
>
> With the fixes to the building of LLVM-C.dll in D56781 this should now
> be safe to land. This will greatly simplify dealing with LLVM for people
> that just want to use the C API on windows. This is a follow up from
> D35077.
>
> Patch by Jakob Bornecrantz!
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56774
llvm-svn: 352492
r352221 caused regressions in CUDA/HIP since device function may use _Float16 whereas host does not support it.
In this case host compilation should not diagnose usage of _Float16 in device functions or variables.
For now just do not diagnose _Float16 for CUDA/HIP. In the future we should have more precise check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57369
llvm-svn: 352488
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a
jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump
table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a
conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the
default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This
patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable
defaults.
Review ID: D52002
Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 352484
Some new tests in libfuzzer have dependencies on zlib: add a feature test
for zlib so that we can add a REQUIRES field to the relevant tests.
Patch by Matthew Voss.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57366
llvm-svn: 352483
Summary:
USRs for macros were not cannonical due to usage of cursor location
instead of definition location.
Reviewers: jkorous
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57228
llvm-svn: 352481
Re-enable the code to rewrite main-function signatures into
"int main(int argc, char *argv[])", but limited to only handling
the case of "int main(void)", so that it doesn't silently strip
an argument in the "int main(int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[])"
case.
This allows main to be called by C startup code, since WebAssembly
requires caller and callee signatures to match, so it can't rely
on passing main a different number of arguments than it expects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57323
llvm-svn: 352479
This attempts to optimise negative values used in load/store operands
a little. We currently try to selct them as rr, materialising the
negative constant using a MOV/MVN pair. This instead selects ri with
an immediate of 0, forcing the add node to become a simpler sub.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57121
llvm-svn: 352475
When a function takes the address of a field the analyzer will no longer
assume that the function will change other fields of the enclosing structs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230
llvm-svn: 352473
This test started XPASSing with r352467, and the change in behaviour
performed by that patch does appear to fix the cause of the original XFAIL
(missing FrameIndex DBG_VALUE), which I've replicated locally with
-mtriple=powerpc64--.
I'll write this up in PR21881 which documents the XFAIL, and seek
confirmation I haven't overlooked something here.
llvm-svn: 352471
Summary:
This patch avoids an assert in IPConstantPropagation when
there is a argument count/type mismatch between the caller and
the callee.
While this is actually UB on C-level (clang emits a warning),
the IR verifier seems to accept it. I'm not sure what other
frontends/languages might think about this, so simply bailing out
to avoid hitting an assert (in CallSiteBase<>::getArgOperand or
Value::doRAUW) seems like a simple solution.
The problem is exposed by the fact that AbstractCallSites will look
through a bitcast at the callee position of a call/invoke.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, reames, efriedma
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, efriedma
Subscribers: eli.friedman, efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57052
llvm-svn: 352469
A FrameIndex should be valid throughout a block regardless of what instructions
get selected in that block -- therefore we shouldn't harness dbg.values that
refer to FrameIndexes to an SDNode. There are numerous codegen reasons why
an SDNode never appears or doesn't become a location that a DBG_VALUE can
refer to. None of them actually affect the variable location.
Therefore, before any other tests to encode dbg_values in a SelectionDAG,
identify FrameIndex operands and encode them unattached to any SDNode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57328
llvm-svn: 352467
Windows ARM64 has PIC relocation model and uses jump table kind
EK_LabelDifference32. This produces jump table entry as
".word LBB123 - LJTI1_2" which represents the distance between the block
and jump table.
A new relocation type (IMAGE_REL_ARM64_REL32) is needed to do the fixup
correctly if they are in different COFF section.
This change saves the jump table to the same COFF section as the
associated code. An ideal fix could be utilizing IMAGE_REL_ARM64_REL32
relocation type.
Patch by Tom Tan!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57277
llvm-svn: 352465
Summary:
This patch adds the basic support of methods reconstruction by native PDB
plugin. It contains only most obvious changes (it processes LF_ONEMETHOD and
LF_METHOD records), some things still remain unsolved:
- mangled names retrieving;
- support of template methods.
Reviewers: zturner, labath, lemo, stella.stamenova
Reviewed by: zturner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56126
llvm-svn: 352464
This patch makes sure that a debug value that is after the bitcast in
dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts() is also skipped.
The reduced test case is from SPEC-2006 on SystemZ.
Review: Vedant Kumar, Wolfgang Pieb
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57050
llvm-svn: 352462
The existing typedef of unw_fpreg_t to uint64_t might work and be
correct for the ARM_EHABI case, but for dwarf, some cases in e.g.
DwarfInstructions.hpp convert between double and unw_fpreg_t.
When converting implicitly between double and unw_fpreg_t (uint64_t),
the values get interpreted as integers and converted to float and vice
versa, while the correct thing would be to keep the same bit pattern.
Avoid the whole issue by using the same definition of unw_fpreg_t
as all other architectures, when using dwarf unwinding on ARM.
Change assembler functions to take a void pointer instead of
unw_fpreg_t pointer, to avoid having a different mangled symbol name
depending on the actual value of this typedef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57001
llvm-svn: 352461
GCC can use LLD with -fuse-ld=lld for MinGW these days, but by
default these options are passed to the linker (unless -fno-lto
is passed to the GCC driver).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57304
llvm-svn: 352459
Without the fix we get the following (with -Werror):
../lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp:14181:58: error: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Werror,-Wmissing-braces]
SmallVector<std::array<int, 2>, 2> LaneSrcs(NumLanes, {-1, -1});
^~~~~~
{ }
1 error generated.
llvm-svn: 352455
I had a local change I hadn't realized when submitting that auto-update. As such, the auto-update was wrong. This should fix it, and with that, it's clearly time to stop submitting changes and go to bed.
llvm-svn: 352454
Louis Dionne