Commit Graph

53 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth 94d0251824 Completely refactor the structuring of unittest CMake files to match the
Makefiles, the CMake files in every other part of the LLVM tree, and
sanity.

This should also restore the output tree structure of all the unit
tests, sorry for breaking that, and thanks for letting me know.

The fundamental change is to put a CMakeLists.txt file in the unittest
directory, with a single test binary produced from it. This has several
advantages:

- No more weird directory stripping in the unittest macro, allowing it
  to be used more readily in other projects.
- No more directory prefixes on all the source files.
- Allows correct and precise use of LLVM's per-directory dependency
  system.
- Allows use of the checking logic for source files that have not been
  added to the CMake build. This uncovered a file being skipped with
  CMake in LLVM and one in Clang's unit tests.
- Makes Specifying conditional compilation or other custom logic for JIT
  tests easier.

It did require adding the concept of an explicit 'optional' source file
to the CMake build so that the missing-file check can skip cases where
the file is *supposed* to be missing. =]

This is another chunk of refactoring the CMake build in order to make it
usable for other clients like CompilerRT / ASan / TSan.

Note that this is interdependent with a Clang CMake change.

llvm-svn: 158909
2012-06-21 09:51:26 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 5fa5ecf852 Bitcode: Don't expose WriteBitcodeToStream to clients.
llvm-svn: 151747
2012-02-29 20:30:56 +00:00
Chandler Carruth e517273e50 Undo the hack in r147427 and move this unittest to a better home. This
is testing the bitcode reader's functionality, not VMCore's. Add the
what is a hope sufficient build system mojo to build and run a new
unittest.

Also clean up some of the test's naming. The goal for the file should be
to unittest the Bitcode Reader, and this is just one particular test
among potentially many in the future. Also, reverse my position and
relegate the PR# to a comment, but stash the comment on the same line as
the test name so it doesn't get lost. This makes the code more
self-documenting hopefully w/o losing track of the PR number.

llvm-svn: 147431
2012-01-02 09:19:48 +00:00