class template member classes (PR19613)
Also improve this code in general by implementing suggestions
from Richard.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3555?id=9020
llvm-svn: 207822
We never aka vector types because our attributed syntax for it is less
comprehensible than the typedefs. This leaves the user in the dark when
the typedef isn't named that well.
Example:
v2s v; v4f w;
w = v;
The naming in this cases isn't even that bad, but the error we give is
useless without looking up the actual typedefs.
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' from incompatible type 'v2s'
Now:
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' (vector of 4 'float' values) from
incompatible type 'v2s' (vector of 2 'int' values)
We do this for all diagnostics that print a vector type.
llvm-svn: 207267
Parse of nested name spacifier is modified so that it properly recovers
if colon is mistyped as double colon in case statement.
This patch fixes PR15133.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2870
llvm-svn: 206135
This introduces the definitions needed for the Windows on ARM target. Add
target definitions for both the MSVC environment and the MSVC + Itanium C++ ABI
environment. The Visual Studio definitions correspond to the definitions
provided by Visual Studio 2012.
llvm-svn: 205650
For namespaces, this is consistent with mangling and GCC's debug info
behavior. For structs, GCC uses <anonymous struct> but we prefer
consistency between all anonymous entities but don't want to confuse
them with template arguments, etc, so we'll just go with parens in all
cases.
llvm-svn: 205398
This removes a diagnostic that is no longer required (the semantic engine now properly handles attribute syntax so __declspec and __attribute__ spellings no longer get mismatched). This caused several testcases to need updating for a slightly different wording.
llvm-svn: 205234
Summary:
Declaring a function as inline after it has been defined is in violation
of [dcl.fct.spec]p4. The program would get a strong definition instead
of getting a function with linkonce_odr linkage.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3220
llvm-svn: 205129
The DiagnosticBuilder's lifetime in parser typo recovery was overlapping with
the subsequent consume which can itself emit PP diagnostics.
Patch by Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 201965
allow this, and we should warn on it, but it turns out that people were already
relying on this.
We should introduce a -Wgcc-compat warning for this if the attributes are known
to GCC, but we don't currently track enough information about attributes to do
so reliably.
llvm-svn: 200045
member-declaration. In the process, fix a couple of bugs that had crept in
where we would parse the first and subsequent member-declarators differently
(in particular, we didn't accept an asm-label on a member function definition
within a class, and we would accept virt-specifiers and attributes in the wrong
order on the first declarator but not on subsequent ones).
llvm-svn: 199957
Due to statement expressions supported as GCC extension, it is possible
to put 'break' or 'continue' into a loop/switch statement but outside
its body, for example:
for ( ; ({ if (first) { first = 0; continue; } 0; }); )
This code is rejected by GCC if compiled in C mode but is accepted in C++
code. GCC bug 44715 tracks this discrepancy. Clang used code generation
that differs from GCC in both modes: only statement of the third
expression of 'for' behaves as if it was inside loop body.
This change makes code generation more close to GCC, considering 'break'
or 'continue' statement in condition and increment expressions of a
loop as it was inside the loop body. It also adds error for the cases
when 'break'/'continue' appear outside loop due to this syntax. If
code generation differ from GCC, warning is issued.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2518
llvm-svn: 199897
a subprocess invocation which is pretty significant on Windows. It also
likely saves a bunch of thrashing the host machine needlessly. Finally
it makes the tests much more predictable and less dependent on the host.
For example 'header_lookup1.c' was passing '-fno-ms-extensions' just to
thwart the host detection adding it into the compilation. By runnig CC1
directly we don't have to deal with such oddities.
llvm-svn: 199308
void knrNoSemi(i) int i { }
Adherents of The C Programming Language unfortunate enough to miss a semicolon
as above would be met with a cascade of errors spanning the remainder of the
TU.
This patch introduces a beautiful parse error recovery, complete with helpful
FixIt to restore sanity.
Before (output redacted for brevity):
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File declarators.c Line 119: declaration does not declare a parameter
File declarators.c Line 123: declaration does not declare a parameter
File declarators.c Line 127: parameter named 'func_E12' is missing
File declarators.c Line 127: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 133: parameter named 'func_E13' is missing
File declarators.c Line 133: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 139: parameter named 'func_E14' is missing
File declarators.c Line 139: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 145: parameter named 'func_E15' is missing
File declarators.c Line 145: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 150: expected function body after function declarator
File declarators.c Line 119: declaration of 'enum E11' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 123: declaration of 'enum E12' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 133: ISO C forbids forward references to 'enum' types
File declarators.c Line 133: declaration of 'enum E13' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 139: ISO C forbids forward references to 'enum' types
File declarators.c Line 139: declaration of 'enum E14' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 145: ISO C forbids forward references to 'enum' types
File declarators.c Line 145: declaration of 'enum E15' will not be visible outside of this function
...
After:
declarators.c:103:24: error: expected ';' at end of declaration
void knrNoSemi(i) int i { }
^
;
Patch found in a sealed envelope dated 1978 with the message "Do not open until
January 2014"
llvm-svn: 198540
Previously any error in enum definition body stopped parsing it. With this
change parser tries to recover from errors.
The patch fixes PR10982.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2018
llvm-svn: 198259
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
This patch was submitted to the list for review and didn't receive a LGTM.
(In fact one explicit objection and one query were raised.)
This reverts commit r197295.
llvm-svn: 197299
Previously, a line like
// expected-error-re {{foo}}
treats the entirety of foo as a regex. This is inconvenient when matching type
names containing regex characters. For example, to match
"void *(class test8::A::*)(void)" inside such a regex, one would have to type
"void \*\(class test8::A::\*\)\(void\)".
This patch changes the semantics of expected-error-re to only treat the parts
of the directive wrapped in double curly braces as regexes. This avoids the
escaping problem and leads to nicer patterns for those cases; see e.g. the
change to test/Sema/format-strings-scanf.c.
(The balanced search for closing }} of a directive also makes us handle the
full directive in test\SemaCXX\constexpr-printing.cpp:41 and :53.)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2388
llvm-svn: 197092
When parsing invalid top-level asm statements, we were ignoring the
return code of the SkipUntil we used for recovery. This led to crashes
when we hit the end of file and tried to continue parsing anyway.
This fixes the crash and adds a couple of tests for parsing related
problems.
llvm-svn: 196961
We would skip until the next comma, hoping good things whould lie there,
however this would fail when we have such things as this:
struct A {};
template <typename>
struct D;
template <>
struct D<C> : B, A::D;
Once this happens, we would believe that D with a nested namespace
specifier of A was a variable that was being declared. We would go on
to complain that there was an extraneous 'template <>' on their variable
declaration.
Crashes would happen when 'A' gets defined as 'enum class A {}' as
various asserts would fire.
Instead, we should skip up until the semicolon if we see that we are in
the middle of a definition and the current token is a ':'
This fixes PR17084.
llvm-svn: 196453
which specifies couple of (optional) method selectors
for bridging a CFobject to or from an ObjectiveC
object. This is wip. // rdsr://15499111
llvm-svn: 196408
In delayed template parsing mode, adjust the template depth counter for each template parameter list associated with an out of line member template specialization.
llvm-svn: 196351
gcc treats [[gnu:const]], [[gnu::__const]], and [[gnu:__const__]] as all being
equivalent. Add an additional test case to ensure that we do not miss the last
case.
llvm-svn: 195982
and we see an ill-formed declarator that would probably be well-formed if the
tag definition were just missing a semicolon, use that as the diagnostic
instead of producing some other mysterious error.
llvm-svn: 195163
This patch fixes PR8264. Duplicate qualifiers already are diagnozed,
now the same diagnostics is issued for duplicate function specifiers.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2025
llvm-svn: 194559
definition. If we see something that looks like a namespace definition inside a
class, that strongly indicates that a close brace was missing somewhere.
llvm-svn: 194319
into a separate "parse an attribute that takes a type argument" codepath. This
results in both codepaths being a lot cleaner and simpler, and fixes some bugs
where the type argument handling bled into the expression argument handling and
caused us to both accept invalid and reject valid attribute arguments.
llvm-svn: 193731
which we don't think can't have one, only allow it in the tiny number of
attributes which opts into this weird parse rule.
I've manually checked that the handlers for all these attributes can in fact
cope with an identifier as the argument. This is still somewhat terrible; we
should move more fully towards picking the parsing rules based on the
attribute, and make the Parse -> Sema interface more type-safe.
llvm-svn: 193295
Commit r191484 treated constexpr function templates as normal function
templates with respect to delaying their parsing. However, this is
unnecessarily restrictive because there is no compatibility concern with
constexpr, MSVC doesn't support it.
Instead, simply disable delayed template parsing for constexpr function
templates. This largely reverts the changes made in r191484 but keeps
it's unit test.
This fixes PR17661.
llvm-svn: 193274
This patch wasn't reviewed, and isn't correctly preserving the behaviors
relied upon by QT. I don't have a direct example of fallout, but it
should go through the standard code review process. For example, it
should never have removed the QT test case that was added when fixing
those users.
llvm-svn: 193174
This is a fix to PR17649, caused by fix in r193073. QT uses 'break' statement
to implement their 'foreach' macro. To enable build of QT, this fix reenables
break but only in 'for' statement specifier and only in the third expression.
llvm-svn: 193170
Due to statement expressions supported as GCC extension, it is possible
to put 'break' or 'continue' into a loop/switch statement but outside its
body, for example:
for ( ; ({ if (first) { first = 0; continue; } 0; }); )
Such usage must be diagnosed as an error, GCC rejects it. To recognize
this and similar patterns the flags BreakScope and ContinueScope are
temporarily turned off while parsing condition expression.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1762
llvm-svn: 193073
Now that CorrectTypo knows how to correctly search classes for typo
correction candidates, there is no good reason to only replace an
existing CXXScopeSpecifier if it refers to a namespace. While the actual
enablement was a matter of changing a single comparison, the fallout
from enabling the functionality required a lot more code changes
(including my two previous commits).
llvm-svn: 193020
r177003 applied the late parsed template technique to friend functions
but omitted the corresponding check for redefinitions.
This patch adds the same check already in use for templates to the
new code path in order to diagnose and reject invalid redefinitions
that were being silently accepted.
Fixes PR17324.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 192948
that looks like a function declaration, except that it's missing a return type,
try typo-correcting it to the relevant constructor name.
In passing, fix a bug where the missing-type-specifier recovery codepath would
drop a preceding scope specifier on the floor, leading to follow-on diagnostics
and incorrect recovery for the auto-in-c++98 hack.
llvm-svn: 192644
An invalid decltype expression like 'decltype int' gives:
error: expected '(' after 'decltype'
This makes it so 'sizeof int' gives a similar one:
error: expected parentheses around type name in sizeof expression
llvm-svn: 192258
MSVC and clang with -fms-extensions allow pure virtual methods to be
defined inline after the "= 0" tokens. Clang warns on these because it
is not standard, but incorrectly warns on out-of-line definitions, which
are standard.
With this change, clang will only warn on inline definitions of pure
virtual methods.
Fixes some self-host warnings on out-of-line definitions of pure virtual
destructors.
llvm-svn: 192244
We previously handled one-dimensional arrays but didn't consider the
general case. The fix is simple: keep going through subsequent
dimensions until we get to the base element.
llvm-svn: 191493
Functions declared as constexpr must have their parsing delayed in
-fdelayed-template-parsing mode so as not to upset later template
instantiation.
N.B. My reading of the standard makes it seem like delayed template
parsing is at odds with constexpr. We may want to make refinements in
other places in clang to make constexpr play nicer with this feature.
This fixes PR17334.
llvm-svn: 191484
Summary:
Parsing cast expressions during error recovery can put us in a bad
state. Check to see if the token for a simple-type-specifier makes
sense before further parsing.
Fixes PR17255.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, CornedBee, eli.friedman
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1696
llvm-svn: 191159
fields in the class. This allows a better checking of member intiailizers and
in class initializers in regards to initialization ordering.
For instance, this code will now produce warnings:
class A {
int x;
int y;
A() : x(y) {} // y is initialized after x, warn here
A(int): y(x) {} // default initialization of leaves x uninitialized, warn here
};
Several test cases were updated with -Wno-uninitialized to silence this warning.
llvm-svn: 191068
When a comma occurs in a default argument or default initializer within a
class, disambiguate whether it is part of the initializer or whether it ends
the initializer.
The way this works (which I will be proposing for standardization) is to treat
the comma as ending the default argument or default initializer if the
following token sequence matches the syntactic constraints of a
parameter-declaration-clause or init-declarator-list (respectively).
This is both consistent with the disambiguation rules elsewhere (where entities
are treated as declarations if they can be), and should have no regressions
over our old behavior. I think it might also disambiguate all cases correctly,
but I don't have a proof of that.
There is an annoyance here: because we're performing a tentative parse in a
situation where we may not have seen declarations of all relevant entities (if
the comma is part of the initializer, lookup may find entites declared later in
the class), we need to turn off typo-correction and diagnostics during the
tentative parse, and in the rare case that we decide the comma is part of the
initializer, we need to revert all token annotations we performed while
disambiguating.
Any diagnostics that occur outside of the immediate context of the tentative
parse (for instance, if we trigger the implicit instantiation of a class
template) are *not* suppressed, mirroring the usual rules for a SFINAE context.
llvm-svn: 190639
Summary:
__uuidof on templated types should exmaine if any of its template
parameters have a uuid declspec. If exactly one does, then take it.
Otherwise, issue an appropriate error.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1419
llvm-svn: 190240
is at the end of the line, point to the location after the double colon instead
of at the next token. There is more context to be given this way. In addition,
the next token can be several lines later.
llvm-svn: 190029
Summary:
Transform the token sequence for:
typename typedef T U;
to:
typename T typedef U;
Raise a diagnostic when this happens but only if we succeeded handling
the typename.
Reviewers: rsmith, rnk
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1433
llvm-svn: 189867
Summary:
There were two things known to be wrong with our implementation of MSVC
mode template arguments:
- We didn't properly handle __uuidof/CXXUuidofExpr and skipped all type
checking completely.
- We didn't allow for MSVC's extension of allowing certain constant
"foldable" expressions from showing up in template arguments.
They allow various casts dereference and address-of operations.
We can make it more general as we find further peculiarities but this
is the known extent.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
CC: cfe-commits, rnk
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1444
llvm-svn: 189087
It doesn't make any sense to accept "..." in the argument to a C-style cast,
so use a separate expression list parsing routine which rejects it. PR16874.
llvm-svn: 188330
ParseCXXClassMemberDeclaration was trying to use the result of
ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator to attach it to some late parsed attributes.
However when failures arise, we have no decl to attach to which
eventually leads us to a NULL pointer dereference.
While we are here, clean up the code a bit.
Fixes PR16765
llvm-svn: 187557
followed by an identifier, then diagnose an identifier as being a bogus part of
the declarator instead of tripping over it. Improves diagnostics for cases like
std::vector<const int *p> my_vec;
llvm-svn: 186061
Sema::MergeFunctionDecl attempts merging two decls even if the old decl
is invalid. This can lead to interesting circumstances where we
successfully merge the decls but the result makes no sense.
Take the following for example:
template <typename T>
int main(void);
int main(void);
Sema will not consider these to be overloads of the same name because
main can't be overloaded, which means that this must be a redeclaration.
In this case the templated decl is compatible with the non-templated
decl allowing the Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration machinery to move on
and do bizarre things like setting the previous decl of a non-templated
decl to a templated decl!
The way I see it, we should just bail from MergeFunctionDecl if the old
decl is invalid.
This fixes PR16531.
llvm-svn: 185779
previously didn't work if a mem-initializer-id had a template argument which
contained parentheses or braces.
We now implement a simple rule: just look for a ') {' or '} {' that is not
nested. The '{' is assumed to start the function-body. There are still two
cases which we misparse, where the ') {' comes from a compound literal or
from a lambda. The former case is not valid C++, and the latter will probably
not be valid C++ once DR1607 is resolved, so these seem to be of low value,
and we do not regress on them with this change. EDG and g++ also misparse
both of these cases.
llvm-svn: 185598
PR16456 reported that Clang implements a hybrid between AltiVec's
"Keyword and Predefine Method" and its "Context Sensitive Keyword
Method," where "bool" is always a keyword, but "vector" and "pixel"
are context-sensitive keywords. This isn't permitted by the AltiVec
spec. For consistency with gcc, this patch implements the Context
Sensitive Keyword Method for bool, and stops treating true and false
as keywords in Altivec mode.
The patch removes KEYALTIVEC as a trigger for defining these keywords
in include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def, and adds logic for "vector
bool" that mirrors the existing logic for "vector pixel." The test
case is taken from the bug report.
llvm-svn: 185580
The removal is tried by retrying the failed lookup of a correction
candidate with either the MemberContext or SS (CXXScopeSpecifier) or
both set to NULL if they weren't already. If the candidate identifier
is then looked up successfully, make a note in the candidate that the
SourceRange should include any existing nested name specifier even if
the candidate isn't adding a different one (i.e. the candidate has a
NULL NestedNameSpecifier).
Also tweak the diagnostic messages to differentiate between a suggestion
that just replaces the identifer but leaves the existing nested name
specifier intact and one that replaces the entire qualified identifier,
in cases where the suggested replacement is unqualified.
llvm-svn: 185487
*that* easy...
Try a bit harder to disambiguate. This is mostly straightforward, but for
=-style initializers, we actually need to know where an expression ends:
[foo = bar baz]
is a message send, whereas
[foo = bar + baz]
is a lambda-introducer. Handle this by parsing the expression eagerly, and
replacing it with an annotation token. By chance, we use the *exact same*
parsing rules in both cases (except that we need to assume we're inside a
message send for the parse, to turn off various forms of inapplicable
error recovery).
llvm-svn: 182432
a FieldDecl from it, and propagate both into the closure type and the
LambdaExpr.
You can't do much useful with them yet -- you can't use them within the body
of the lambda, because we don't have a representation for "the this of the
lambda, not the this of the enclosing context". We also don't have support or a
representation for a nested capture of an init-capture yet, which was intended
to work despite not being allowed by the current standard wording.
llvm-svn: 181985
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.
llvm-svn: 179969
difference is that we no longer clean the token before emitting it. This fixes a bug where
clang hangs in the middle of crashing because the crash handler calls malloc from inside
a crash that happened inside of free.
llvm-svn: 177919
closing rbrace is missing in an ObjC class declaration.
Can do beter than this, but it involves addition of
overhead which will be present in correct code.
// rdar://6854840
llvm-svn: 177435
Introduce a new AST Decl node "EmptyDecl" to model empty-declaration. Have attributes from attribute-declaration appertain
to the EmptyDecl node by creating the AST representations of these attributes and attach them to the EmptyDecl node so these
attributes can be sema checked just as attributes attached to "normal" declarations.
llvm-svn: 175900
to control the check for the C 5.2.4.1 / C++ [implimits] restriction on nesting
levels for parentheses, brackets and braces.
Some code with heavy macro use exceeds the default limit of 256, but we don't
want to increase it generally to avoid stack overflow on stack-constrained
systems.
llvm-svn: 175855
which allows grouping parens in an abstract-pack-declarator. This was already
mostly implemented, but missed some cases. Add an ExtWarn for use of this
extension until CWG ratifies it.
llvm-svn: 175660
attributes yet, so just issue the appropriate diagnostics. Also generalize the
fixit for attributes-in-the-wrong-place code and reuse it here, if attributes
are placed after the access-specifier or 'virtual' in a base specifier.
llvm-svn: 175575
designator" diagnostic with more correct and more human-friendly "cannot take
address of rvalue of type 'T'".
For the case of & &T::f, provide a custom diagnostic, rather than unhelpfully
saying "cannot take address of rvalue of type '<overloaded function type>'".
For the case of &array_temporary, treat it just like a class temporary
(including allowing it as an extension); the existing diagnostic wording
for the class temporary case works fine.
llvm-svn: 174262
the diagnostic's warn_ name. Switch some places (notably C++11 attributes)
which really wanted an error over to a different diagnostic. Finally, suppress
the diagnostic entirely for __ptr32, __ptr64 and __w64, to avoid producing
diagnostics in important system headers.
llvm-svn: 173788
It turns out that there's no correctness bug here (because we can't have a type
definition in this location), but there was a diagnostic bug.
llvm-svn: 173766
on a type. Currently, it gives a generic "expected unqualified-id" error.
The new error message is "cannot use (dot|arrow) operator on a type".
llvm-svn: 173556
r159549 / r159164 regressed clang to reject
struct s {};
struct s
operator++(struct s a)
{ return a; }
This fixes the regression. Richard, pleas check if this looks right.
llvm-svn: 172834
it apart from [[gnu::noreturn]] / __attribute__((noreturn)), since their
semantics are not equivalent (for instance, we treat [[gnu::noreturn]] as
affecting the function type, whereas [[noreturn]] does not).
llvm-svn: 172691
with function definitions.
We really should remove Parser::isDeclarationAfterDeclarator entirely, since
it's meaningless in C++11 (an open brace could be either a function definition
or an initializer, which is what it's trying to differentiate between). The
other caller of it happens to be correct right now...
llvm-svn: 172510
attributes appertain to a declaration, even though they would be much more
naturally modelled as appertaining to a function type. Previously, we would
try to distribute them from the declarator to the function type, then
reject them for being at an incorrect location. Now, we just distribute them
as far as the declarator; the existing attribute handling code can actually
apply them there just fine.
llvm-svn: 172504
1) Supported by Clang, and
2) Supported by GCC, and
3) Documented in GCC's manual.
g++ allows its C++11-style attributes to appertain only to the entity being
declared, and never to a type (even for a type attribute), so we do the same.
llvm-svn: 172382
Following r168626, in class declaration or definition, there are a combination of syntactic locations
where C++11 attributes could appear, and among those the only valid location permitted by standard is
between class-key and class-name. So for those attributes appear at wrong locations, fixit is used to
move them to expected location and we recover by applying them to the class specifier.
llvm-svn: 171757
C++11 allowed writing "vector<vector<int>>" without a space between the two ">".
This change allows this for protocols in template lists too in -std=c++11 mode,
and improves the diagnostic in c++98 mode.
llvm-svn: 170223
Our error recovery path may have made the class anonymous, and that has a pretty
disastrous impact on any attempt to parse a class body containing constructors.
llvm-svn: 169374
This change list implemented logic that explicitly detects several combinations of locations where C++11 attribute
specifiers might be incorrectly placed within a class specifier. Previously we emit generic diagnostics like
"expected identifier" for such cases; now we emit specific diagnostic against the misplaced attributes, this also
fixed a bug in old code where attributes appear at legitimate locations were incorrectly rejected.
Thanks to Richard Smith for reviewing!
llvm-svn: 168626
We don't support any C++11 attributes that appertain to declaration specifiers so reject
the attributes in parser until we support them; this also conforms to what g++ 4.8 is doing.
llvm-svn: 167481
Richard Smith