Summary:
This patch is a small refactoring necessary for
'readability-isolate-declaration' and does not introduce functional changes.
It allows to use the utility functions without a full `ASTContext` and requires only the `SourceManager` and the `LangOpts`.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52684
llvm-svn: 343850
Summary:
The cppcoreguidelines-pro-bounds-pointer-arithmetic warns on all occassion where
pointer arithmetic is used, but does not check values where the pointer types
is deduced via `auto`. This patch adjusts this behaviour and solved
PR36489.
I accidentally commited a wrong patch, this Differential is meant to have a
correct revision description and code attached to it.
Because the patch was accepted by aaron.ballman already, i will just commit
it.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D48717 for the old differntial (contains wrong
code from the mixup)
Subscribers: nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49682
llvm-svn: 337716
Summary:
Checks for narrowing conversions, e.g.
int i = 0;
i += 0.1;
This has what some might consider false positives for:
i += ceil(d);
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: srhines, nemanjai, mgorny, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, kbarton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38455
llvm-svn: 333066
Summary:
C++2a allows bitfields to have default member initializers.
Add support for this to clang-tidy's cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init check.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: klimek, nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42426
llvm-svn: 323227
The usage of `goto` is discourage in C++ since forever. This check implements
a warning for every `goto`. Even though there are (rare) valid use cases for
`goto`, better high level constructs should be used.
`goto` is used sometimes in C programs to free resources at the end of
functions in the case of errors. This pattern is better implemented with
RAII in C++.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, jbcoe, Eugene.Zelenko, klimek, nemanjai, mgorny, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41815
llvm-svn: 322626
Summary:
This patch introduces support for legacy C-style resource functions that must obey
the 'owner<>' semantics.
- added legacy creators like malloc,fopen,...
- added legacy consumers like free,fclose,...
This helps codes that mostly benefit from owner:
Legacy, C-Style code that isn't feasable to port directly to RAII but needs a step in between
to identify actual resource management and just using the resources.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, kbarton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38396
llvm-svn: 316092
This patch introduces a note for variable declaration that are later deleted.
Adds FIXME notes for possible automatic type-rewriting positions as well.
Reviewed by aaron.ballman
Differential: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38411
llvm-svn: 314913
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Codereview in D36354
llvm-svn: 313067
This check implements the typebased semantic of `gsl::owner`.
Meaning, that
- only `gsl::owner` is allowed to get `delete`d
- `new` expression must be assigned to `gsl::owner`
- function calls that expect `gsl::owner` as argument, must get either an owner
or a newly created and recognized resource (in the moment only `new`ed memory)
- assignment to `gsl::owner` must be either a resource or another owner
- functions returning an `gsl::owner` are considered as factories, and their result
must be assigned to an `gsl::owner`
- classes that have an `gsl::owner`-member must declare a non-default destructor
There are some problems that occur when typededuction is in place.
For example `auto Var = function_that_returns_owner();` the type of `Var` will not be
an `gsl::owner`. This case is catched, and explicitly noted.
But cases like fully templated functions
```
template <typename T>
void f(T t) { delete t; }
// ...
f(gsl::owner<int*>(new int(42)));
```
Will created false positive (the deletion is problematic), since the type deduction
removes the wrapping `typeAlias`.
Please give your comments :)
llvm-svn: 313043
ADL as reasonable extension points.
All of this would be cleaner if this code followed the more usual LLVM
convention of not having deeply nested namespaces inside of .cpp files
and instead having a `using namespace ...;` at the top. Then the static
function would be in the global namespace and easily referred to as
`::join`. Instead we have to write a fairly contrived qualified name.
I figure the authors can clean this up with a less ambiguous name, using
the newly provided LLVM `join` function, or any other solution, but this
at least fixes the build.
llvm-svn: 298434
Summary:
Hello everybody,
this is an incremental patch for the NoMalloc-Checker I wrote. It allows to configure the memory-management functions, that are checked,
This might be helpful for a code base with custom functions in use, or non-standard functionality, like posix_memalign.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: sbenza, nemanjai, JDevlieghere
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Jonas Toth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28239
llvm-svn: 296734
Summary:
This checker flags the use of C-style memory management functionality and notes about modern alternatives.
In an earlier revision it tried to autofix some kind of patterns, but that was a bad idea. Since memory management can be so widespread in a program, manual updating is most likely necessary.
Maybe for special cases, there could be later additions to this basic checker.
This is the first checker I wrote and I never did something with clang (only compiling programs). So whenever I missed conventions or did plain retarded stuff, feel free to point it out! I am willing to fix them and write a better checker.
I hope the patch does work, I never did this either. On a testapply in my repository it did, but I am pretty unconfident in my patching skills :)
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: cfe-commits, JDevlieghere, nemanjai, Eugene.Zelenko, Prazek, mgorny, modocache
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26167
Patch by Jonas Toth!
llvm-svn: 289546
Summary:
This doesn't work after converting SmallSetVector to use DenseSet.
Instead we can just use a SmallVector.
Reviewers: timshen
Subscribers: nemanjai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25647
llvm-svn: 284873
Summary:
The matcher for matching "class with default constructor" still match
some classes without default constructor, which trigger an assert at
Line 307. This patch makes the matcher more strict.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25747
llvm-svn: 284727
Classes with virtual methods or virtual bases are not trivially default constructible, so their members and bases need to be initialized.
Patch by Malcolm Parsons.
llvm-svn: 283224
Summary:
Use a set rather than a vector of defined special member functions so
that multiple declarations of the same function are only counted once.
Move some private static member functions into the cpp file.
Run clang-format on header.
Reviewers: ericLemanissier, Prazek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Prazek, cfe-commits, nemanjai
Projects: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23008
llvm-svn: 277523
Jonas Toth