The only subexpression that is considered an error now is TypoExpr, but
we plan to add expressions with errors to improve editor tooling on broken
code. We intend to use the same mechanism to guard against spurious
diagnostics on those as well.
See the follow-up revision for an actual usage of the flag.
Original patch from Ilya.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65591
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after fixing MSAN failures caused by incomplete initialization of AutoTypeLocs in TypeSpecLocFiller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after incorrect check in NonTypeTemplateParmDecl broke lldb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
Implement support for C++2a requires-expressions.
Re-commit after compilation failure on some platforms due to alignment issues with PointerIntPair.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50360
Add support for type-constraints in template type parameters.
Also add support for template type parameters as pack expansions (where the type constraint can now contain an unexpanded parameter pack).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44352
Allow to build PCH's (with -building-pch-with-obj and the extra .o file)
with -fmodules-codegen -fmodules-debuginfo to allow emitting shared code
into the extra .o file, similarly to how it works with modules. A bit of
a misnomer, but the underlying functionality is the same. This saves up
to 20% of build time here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69778
If a header contains 'extern template', then the template should be provided
somewhere by an explicit instantiation, so it is not necessary to generate
a copy. Worse, this can lead to an unresolved symbol, because the codegen's
object file will not actually contain functions from such a template
because of the GVA_AvailableExternally, but the object file for the explicit
instantiation will not contain them either because it will be blocked
by the information provided by the module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69779
Function trailing requires clauses now parsed, supported in overload resolution and when calling, referencing and taking the address of functions or function templates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
Added support for constraint satisfaction checking and partial ordering of constraints in constrained partial specialization and function template overloads.
Re-commit after fixing another crash (added regression test).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41910
Added support for constraint satisfaction checking and partial ordering of constraints in constrained partial specialization and function template overloads.
Re-commit after fixing some crashes and warnings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41910
Added support for constraint satisfaction checking and partial ordering of constraints in constrained partial specialization and function template overloads.
Phabricator: D41910
Similar motivations to the movement of ASTRecordReader:
AbstractBasicWriter.h already has quite a few dependencies,
and it's going to get pretty large as we generate more and more
into it. Meanwhile, most clients don't depend on this detail of
the implementation and shouldn't need to be recompiled.
I've also made OMPClauseWriter private, like it belongs.
function.
We need to perform unqualified lookups from the context of a defaulted
comparison, but not until we implicitly define the function, at which
point we can't do those lookups any more. So perform the lookup from the
end of the class containing the =default declaration and store the
lookup results on the defaulted function until we synthesize the body.
This commit sets the Self and Imp declarations for ObjC method declarations,
in addition to the definitions. It also fixes
a bunch of code in clang that had wrong assumptions about when getSelfDecl() would be set:
- CGDebugInfo::getObjCMethodName and AnalysisConsumer::getFunctionName would assume that it was
set for method declarations part of a protocol, which they never were,
and that self would be a Class type, which it isn't as it is id for a protocol.
Also use the Canonical Decl to index the set of Direct methods so that
when calls and implementations interleave, the same llvm::Function is
used and the same symbol name emitted.
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/57661767
Patch by: Pierre Habouzit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71091
Patch was reverted because https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44048
The original patch is modified to set the strictfp IR attribute
explicitly in CodeGen instead of as a side effect of IRBuilder.
In the 2nd attempt to reapply there was a windows lit test fail, the
tests were fixed to use wildcard matching.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62731
This patch is motivated by (and factored out from)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66121 which is a debug info bugfix. Starting
with DWARF 5 all Objective-C methods are nested inside their
containing type, and that patch implements this for synthesized
Objective-C properties.
1. SemaObjCProperty populates a list of synthesized accessors that may
need to inserted into an ObjCImplDecl.
2. SemaDeclObjC::ActOnEnd inserts forward-declarations for all
accessors for which no override was provided into their
ObjCImplDecl. This patch does *not* synthesize AST function
*bodies*. Moving that code from the static analyzer into Sema may
be a good idea though.
3. Places that expect all methods to have bodies have been updated.
I did not update the static analyzer's inliner for synthesized
properties to point back to the property declaration (see
test/Analysis/Inputs/expected-plists/nullability-notes.m.plist), which
I believed to be more bug than a feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68108
rdar://problem/53782400
has a constexpr destructor.
For constexpr variables, reject if the variable does not have constant
destruction. In all cases, do not emit runtime calls to the destructor
for variables with constant destruction.
llvm-svn: 373159
non-trivial C union types
This recommits r365985, which was reverted because it broke a few
projects using unions containing non-trivial ObjC pointer fields in
system headers. We now have a patch to fix the problem (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65256).
Original commit message:
This patch diagnoses uses of non-trivial C unions and structs/unions
containing non-trivial C unions in the following contexts, which require
default-initialization, destruction, or copying of the union objects,
instead of disallowing fields of non-trivial types in C unions, which is
what we currently do:
- function parameters.
- function returns.
- assignments.
- compound literals.
- block captures except capturing of `__block` variables by non-escaping blocks.
- local and global variable definitions.
- lvalue-to-rvalue conversions of volatile types.
See the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62988 for more background.
rdar://problem/50679094
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63753
llvm-svn: 371275
This reverts commit r365985.
Prior to r365985, clang used to mark C union fields that have
non-trivial ObjC ownership qualifiers as unavailable if the union was
declared in a system header. r365985 stopped doing so, which caused the
swift compiler to crash when it tried to import a non-trivial union.
I have a patch that fixes the crash (https://reviews.llvm.org/D65256),
but I'm temporarily reverting the original patch until we can decide on
whether it's taking the right approach.
llvm-svn: 367076
non-trivial C union types
This patch diagnoses uses of non-trivial C unions and structs/unions
containing non-trivial C unions in the following contexts, which require
default-initialization, destruction, or copying of the union objects,
instead of disallowing fields of non-trivial types in C unions, which is
what we currently do:
- function parameters.
- function returns.
- assignments.
- compound literals.
- block captures except capturing of `__block` variables by non-escaping
blocks.
- local and global variable definitions.
- lvalue-to-rvalue conversions of volatile types.
See the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62988 for more background.
rdar://problem/50679094
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63753
llvm-svn: 365985
This moves Bitcode/Bitstream*, Bitcode/BitCodes.h to Bitstream/.
This is needed to avoid a circular dependency when using the bitstream
code for parsing optimization remarks.
Since Bitcode uses Core for the IR part:
libLLVMRemarks -> Bitcode -> Core
and Core uses libLLVMRemarks to generate remarks (see
IR/RemarkStreamer.cpp):
Core -> libLLVMRemarks
we need to separate the Bitstream and Bitcode part.
For clang-doc, it seems that it doesn't need the whole bitcode layer, so
I updated the CMake to only use the bitstream part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63899
llvm-svn: 365091
Summary:
this revision adds Lexing, Parsing and Basic Semantic for the consteval specifier as specified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1073r3.html
with this patch, the consteval specifier is treated as constexpr but can only be applied to function declaration.
Changes:
- add the consteval keyword.
- add parsing of consteval specifier for normal declarations and lambdas expressions.
- add the whether a declaration is constexpr is now represented by and enum everywhere except for variable because they can't be consteval.
- adapt diagnostic about constexpr to print constexpr or consteval depending on the case.
- add tests for basic semantic.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: eraman, efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61790
llvm-svn: 363362
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
explicit function specialization with the MemberSpecializationInfo used
everywhere else.
Not NFC: the ad-hoc pattern tracking was not being serialized /
deserialized properly. That's fixed here.
llvm-svn: 359747
Summary:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf, page 3:
```
structured block
For C/C++, an executable statement, possibly compound, with a single entry at the
top and a single exit at the bottom, or an OpenMP construct.
COMMENT: See Section 2.1 on page 38 for restrictions on structured
blocks.
```
```
2.1 Directive Format
Some executable directives include a structured block. A structured block:
• may contain infinite loops where the point of exit is never reached;
• may halt due to an IEEE exception;
• may contain calls to exit(), _Exit(), quick_exit(), abort() or functions with a
_Noreturn specifier (in C) or a noreturn attribute (in C/C++);
• may be an expression statement, iteration statement, selection statement, or try block, provided
that the corresponding compound statement obtained by enclosing it in { and } would be a
structured block; and
Restrictions
Restrictions to structured blocks are as follows:
• Entry to a structured block must not be the result of a branch.
• The point of exit cannot be a branch out of the structured block.
C / C++
• The point of entry to a structured block must not be a call to setjmp().
• longjmp() and throw() must not violate the entry/exit criteria.
```
Of particular note here is the fact that OpenMP structured blocks are as-if `noexcept`,
in the same sense as with the normal `noexcept` functions in C++.
I.e. if throw happens, and it attempts to travel out of the `noexcept` function
(here: out of the current structured-block), then the program terminates.
Now, one of course can say that since it is explicitly prohibited by the Specification,
then any and all programs that violate this Specification contain undefined behavior,
and are unspecified, and thus no one should care about them. Just don't write broken code /s
But i'm not sure this is a reasonable approach.
I have personally had oss-fuzz issues of this origin - exception thrown inside
of an OpenMP structured-block that is not caught, thus causing program termination.
This issue isn't all that hard to catch, it's not any particularly different from
diagnosing the same situation with the normal `noexcept` function.
Now, clang static analyzer does not presently model exceptions.
But clang-tidy has a simplisic [[ https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-exception-escape.html | bugprone-exception-escape ]] check,
and it is even refactored as a `ExceptionAnalyzer` class for reuse.
So it would be trivial to use that analyzer to check for
exceptions escaping out of OpenMP structured blocks. (D59466)
All that sounds too great to be true. Indeed, there is a caveat.
Presently, it's practically impossible to do. To check a OpenMP structured block
you need to somehow 'get' the OpenMP structured block, and you can't because
it's simply not modelled in AST. `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` is not it's representation.
Now, it is of course possible to write e.g. some AST matcher that would e.g.
match every OpenMP executable directive, and then return the whatever `Stmt` is
the structured block of said executable directive, if any.
But i said //practically//. This isn't practical for the following reasons:
1. This **will** bitrot. That matcher will need to be kept up-to-date,
and refreshed with every new OpenMP spec version.
2. Every single piece of code that would want that knowledge would need to
have such matcher. Well, okay, if it is an AST matcher, it could be shared.
But then you still have `RecursiveASTVisitor` and friends.
`2 > 1`, so now you have code duplication.
So it would be reasonable (and is fully within clang AST spirit) to not
force every single consumer to do that work, but instead store that knowledge
in the correct, and appropriate place - AST, class structure.
Now, there is another hoop we need to get through.
It isn't fully obvious //how// to model this.
The best solution would of course be to simply add a `OMPStructuredBlock` transparent
node. It would be optimal, it would give us two properties:
* Given this `OMPExecutableDirective`, what's it OpenMP structured block?
* It is trivial to check whether the `Stmt*` is a OpenMP structured block (`isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`)
But OpenMP structured block isn't **necessarily** the first, direct child of `OMP*Directive`.
(even ignoring the clang's `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` that were inserted inbetween).
So i'm not sure whether or not we could re-create AST statements after they were already created?
There would be other costs to a new AST node: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563#c12
```
1. You will need to break the representation of loops. The body should be replaced by the "structured block" entity.
2. You will need to support serialization/deserialization.
3. You will need to support template instantiation.
4. You will need to support codegen and take this new construct to account in each OpenMP directive.
```
Instead, there **is** an functionally-equivalent, alternative solution, consisting of two parts.
Part 1:
* Add a member function `isStandaloneDirective()` to the `OMPExecutableDirective` class,
that will tell whether this directive is stand-alone or not, as per the spec.
We need it because we can't just check for the existance of associated statements,
see code comment.
* Add a member function `getStructuredBlock()` to the OMPExecutableDirective` class itself,
that assert that this is not a stand-alone directive, and either return the correct loop body
if this is a loop-like directive, or the captured statement.
This way, given an `OMPExecutableDirective`, we can get it's structured block.
Also, since the knowledge is ingrained into the clang OpenMP implementation,
it will not cause any duplication, and //hopefully// won't bitrot.
Great we achieved 1 of 2 properties of `OMPStructuredBlock` approach.
Thus, there is a second part needed:
* How can we check whether a given `Stmt*` is `OMPStructuredBlock`?
Well, we can't really, in general. I can see this workaround:
```
class FunctionASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor> {
using Base = RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor>;
public:
bool VisitOMPExecDir(OMPExecDir *D) {
OmpStructuredStmts.emplace_back(D.getStructuredStmt());
}
bool VisitSOMETHINGELSE(???) {
if(InOmpStructuredStmt)
HI!
}
bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Node) {
if (!Node)
return Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node)
++InOmpStructuredStmt;
Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node) {
OmpStructuredStmts.pop_back();
--InOmpStructuredStmt;
}
return true;
}
std::vector<Stmt*> OmpStructuredStmts;
int InOmpStructuredStmt = 0;
};
```
But i really don't see using it in practice.
It's just too intrusive; and again, requires knowledge duplication.
.. but no. The solution lies right on the ground.
Why don't we simply store this `i'm a openmp structured block` in the bitfield of the `Stmt` itself?
This does not appear to have any impact on the memory footprint of the clang AST,
since it's just a single extra bit in the bitfield. At least the static assertions don't fail.
Thus, indeed, we can achieve both of the properties without a new AST node.
We can cheaply set that bit right in sema, at the end of `Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective()`,
by just calling the `getStructuredBlock()` that we just added.
Test coverage that demonstrates all this has been added.
This isn't as great with serialization though. Most of it does not use abbrevs,
so we do end up paying the full price (4 bytes?) instead of a single bit.
That price, of course, can be reclaimed by using abbrevs.
In fact, i suspect that //might// not just reclaim these bytes, but pack these PCH significantly.
I'm not seeing a third solution. If there is one, it would be interesting to hear about it.
("just don't write code that would require `isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`" is not a solution.)
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563 | PR40563 ]].
Reviewers: ABataev, rjmccall, hfinkel, rsmith, riccibruno, gribozavr
Reviewed By: ABataev, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, aaron.ballman, steveire, guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214
llvm-svn: 356570
initializes a local auto variable or is assigned to a local auto
variable that is declared in the scope that introduced the block
literal.
rdar://problem/13289333
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58514
llvm-svn: 355012
For global variables with unordered initialization that are instantiated
within a module, we previously did not emit the global (or its
initializer) at all unless it was used in the importing translation unit
(and sometimes not even then!), leading to misbehavior and link errors.
We now emit the initializer for an instantiated global variable with
unordered initialization with side-effects in a module into every
translation unit that imports the module. This is unfortunate, but
mostly matches the behavior of a non-modular compilation and seems to be
the best that we can reasonably do.
llvm-svn: 353240
This patch implements parsing and sema for "omp declare mapper"
directive. User defined mapper, i.e., declare mapper directive, is a new
feature in OpenMP 5.0. It is introduced to extend existing map clauses
for the purpose of simplifying the copy of complex data structures
between host and device (i.e., deep copy). An example is shown below:
struct S { int len; int *d; };
#pragma omp declare mapper(struct S s) map(s, s.d[0:s.len]) // Memory region that d points to is also mapped using this mapper.
Contributed-by: Lingda Li <lildmh@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56326
llvm-svn: 352906
Haojian Wu