We used to be over-conservative about preserving inbounds. Actually, the second
GEP (which applies the constant offset) can inherit the inbounds attribute of
the original GEP, because the resultant pointer is equivalent to that of the
original GEP. For example,
x = GEP inbounds a, i+5
=>
y = GEP a, i // inbounds removed
x = GEP inbounds y, 5 // inbounds preserved
llvm-svn: 244937
Summary:
SpeculativeExecution enables a series straight line optimizations (such
as SLSR and NaryReassociate) on conditional code. For example,
if (...)
... b * s ...
if (...)
... (b + 1) * s ...
speculative execution can hoist b * s and (b + 1) * s from then-blocks,
so that we have
... b * s ...
if (...)
...
... (b + 1) * s ...
if (...)
...
Then, SLSR can rewrite (b + 1) * s to (b * s + s) because after
speculative execution b * s dominates (b + 1) * s.
The performance impact of this change is significant. It speeds up the
benchmarks running EigenFloatContractionKernelInternal16x16
(ba68f42fa6/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/src/Tensor/TensorContractionCuda.h?at=default#cl-526)
by roughly 2%. Some internal benchmarks that have the above code pattern
are improved by up to 40%. No significant slowdowns are observed on
Eigen CUDA microbenchmarks.
Reviewers: jholewinski, broune, eliben
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11201
llvm-svn: 242437
This only updates one of the uses. The other is used in cases
that may never touch memory, so I'm not sure why this is even
calling it. Perhaps there should be a new, similar hook for such
cases or pass -1 for unknown address space.
llvm-svn: 239540
Summary:
Consider (B | i) * S as (B + i) * S if B and i have no bits set in
common.
Test Plan: @or in slsr-mul.ll
Reviewers: broune, meheff
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9788
llvm-svn: 237456
Summary:
We pick this order because SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP may create more
opportunities for SLSR.
Test Plan:
reassociate-geps-and-slsr.ll
no performance regression on internal benchmarks
Reviewers: meheff
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9230
llvm-svn: 235632
Summary:
After we rewrite a candidate, the instructions used by the old form may
become unused. This patch cleans up these unused instructions so that we
needn't run DCE after SLSR.
Test Plan: removed -dce in all the SLSR tests
Reviewers: broune, meheff
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9101
llvm-svn: 235410
Summary:
With this patch, SLSR may rewrite
S1: X = B + i * S
S2: Y = B + i' * S
to
S2: Y = X + (i' - i) * S
A secondary improvement: if (i' - i) is a power of 2, emit Y as X + (S << log(i' - i)). (S << log(i' -i)) is in a canonical form and thus more likely GVN'ed than (i' - i) * S.
Test Plan: slsr-add.ll
Reviewers: hfinkel, sanjoy, meheff, broune, eliben
Reviewed By: eliben
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8983
llvm-svn: 235019
Summary:
The old requirement on GEP candidates being in bounds is unnecessary.
For off-bound GEPs, we still have
&B[i * S] = B + (i * S) * e = B + (i * e) * S
Test Plan: slsr_offbound_gep in slsr-gep.ll
Reviewers: meheff
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8809
llvm-svn: 233949
Summary:
This patch enhances SLSR to handle another candidate form &B[i * S]. If
we found two candidates
S1: X = &B[i * S]
S2: Y = &B[i' * S]
and S1 dominates S2, we can replace S2 with
Y = &X[(i' - i) * S]
Test Plan:
slsr-gep.ll
X86/no-slsr.ll: verify that we do not run SLSR on GEPs that already fit into
an addressing mode
Reviewers: eliben, atrick, meheff, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7459
llvm-svn: 233286
Summary:
Straight-line strength reduction (SLSR) is implemented in GCC but not yet in
LLVM. It has proven to effectively simplify statements derived from an unrolled
loop, and can potentially benefit many other cases too. For example,
LLVM unrolls
#pragma unroll
foo (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
sum += foo((b + i) * s);
}
into
sum += foo(b * s);
sum += foo((b + 1) * s);
sum += foo((b + 2) * s);
However, no optimizations yet reduce the internal redundancy of the three
expressions:
b * s
(b + 1) * s
(b + 2) * s
With SLSR, LLVM can optimize these three expressions into:
t1 = b * s
t2 = t1 + s
t3 = t2 + s
This commit is only an initial step towards implementing a series of such
optimizations. I will implement more (see TODO in the file commentary) in the
near future. This optimization is enabled for the NVPTX backend for now.
However, I am more than happy to push it to the standard optimization pipeline
after more thorough performance tests.
Test Plan: test/StraightLineStrengthReduce/slsr.ll
Reviewers: eliben, HaoLiu, meheff, hfinkel, jholewinski, atrick
Reviewed By: jholewinski, atrick
Subscribers: karthikthecool, jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7310
llvm-svn: 228016
Jingyue Wu